帳號:guest(18.217.239.78)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:詹右任
作者(英文):Chan-Yu Jen
論文名稱:部門別報導與分析師預測之關聯性:論董事會特性之影響
論文名稱(英文):The Relationship between Segment reporting and Analyst Forecast:The Role of the Board Characteristics
指導教授:陳家慧
指導教授(英文):Chia-Hui Chen
口試委員:林穎芬
李佳玲
口試委員(英文):Ying-Fen Lin
Chia-Ling Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:會計與財務碩士學位學程
學號:610338023
出版年(民國):108
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:64
關鍵詞:部門別報導品質董事會特性分析師預測誤差
關鍵詞(英文):Segment reporting qualityBoard CharacteristicsAnalyst forecasting error
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:33
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:1
  • 收藏收藏:0
我國財務會計準則第41號公報「營運部門資訊之揭露」規範企業應提供部門別報導於財務報表使用者。此一公報乃參考國際財務報告準則第八號規定(IFRS 8),企業必須採用管理法揭露部門別資訊,以強化公司資訊透明度。因財務會計準則第41號公報規定適用日期為2011年1月1日,故本研究以台灣2011年至2017年之上市櫃公司作為樣本區間,以探討部門別報導品質與分析師預測誤差之關聯性。並進一步探討,董事會特性是否會影響部門別報導品質與分析師預測誤差之間的關聯性。研究結果發現,部門別報導品質因衡量方式為銷貨成長率之差異,亦即營業部門之性質具差異性,使營運複雜程度提升,導致分析師對資訊掌握度減少,造成盈餘預測誤差擴大。另外,在探討董事會特性的影響後發現,當董事會監督有效性愈好,將加強部門別報導品質與分析師預測誤差之間的負向關聯。
GAAP No. 41 regulates enterprises to provide segement reporting to users of financial statements.The GAAP NO. 41 refers to the Standard IFRS 8, Operating Segments, that is, companies must adopt management methods to expose segement information to enhance corporate information transparency. Therefore, this study uses the publicly-traded firms in Taiwan from 2011 to 2017 as sample intervals to explore the correlation between segment reporting quality and analyst forecasting error. And further explore whether the role of the board characteristics will affect the correlation between the quality of the segment reporting and analyst forecasting error.The result show that The quality of the segment reporting is measured by the difference in the growth rate of sales, that is, the nature of the operating segments is different, which increases the complexity of the operation, resulting in the decrease of the information mastery of the analysts and causing the earning forecast error to expand.In addition, Considering the impact of the board characteristics, empirical evidence shows that the better the effectiveness of board supervision, the stronger the negative correlation between segment reporting quality and analyst forecasting error.
壹、緒論.............................................1
一、研究背景與目地....................................1
二、研究預期貢獻......................................4
貳、文獻回顧..........................................7
一、分析師預測誤差.....................................7
二、分析師預測誤差之決定因素............................8
三、部門別報導品質....................................10
四、董事會特性.......................................15
參、假說發展與研究設計...............................19
一、部門別報導品質與分析師預測誤差.....................19
二、董事會特性、對部門別報導品質與分析師預測誤差之影響..20
三、研究設計.........................................22
1.檢測模型...........................................22
2.變數定義...........................................24
四、資料來源與樣本篩選..................................30
肆、實證結果分析......................................33
一、敘述性統計........................................33
二、相關係數分析......................................37
三、實證結果..........................................41
四、額外測試.........................................48
伍、研究結論與建議....................................57
參考文獻..............................................59
一、中文文獻
1.丁小惠,2013,審計委員會、部門報導品質與投資效率之關係:以台灣之企業為例,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。
2.晉誠,2005,法人說明會與公司治理變數對分析師盈餘預測影響之研究,未出版碩士論文,淡江大學會計研究所。
3.林書平,2007,忙碌董事會與忙碌董事對經營績效之影響,私立中國文化大學會計系碩士論文。
4.陳瑞斌、劉立倫與翁慈青,2006,公司治理與分析師預測誤差/離散性關係之研究,台灣金融財務季刊,第7輯第3期:53-93。
5.陳君銘,2010,忙碌獨立董事之聘任及董事會出席率與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
6.張窈菱,2004,年報揭露程度與分析師盈餘預測關係之研究,未出版碩士論文,政治大學會計研究所。
7.許明曄,2005,公司治理與財務分析師預測行為之相關性研究,未出版碩士論文,中興大學會計研究所。
8.蔡旻其,2009,公司治理機制對企業績效與董監薪酬之影響,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
二、英文文獻
1.Abdul Rahman, R., & Ali, F. H. M. 2006. Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7): 783-804.
2.Ajinkya, B. B., & M. J. Gift. 1984. Corporate managers’ earnings forecasts and symmetrical adjustments of market expectations. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (Autumn): 425-444.
3.Antonio Parbonetti, Andrea Menini, Michel Magnan. 2011. Fair Value Accounting:Information or Confusion for Financial Markets.
4.Ayres, D., Huang, X. & Myring, M., 2017. Fair value accounting and analyst forecast accuracy, Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 37:58–70.
5.Baginski, S. P., & J. M. Hassell. 1990. The market interpretation of management earnings forecasts as a predictor of subsequent financial analyst forecast revision. The Accounting Review 65 (January): 175-190.
6.Barker, R., & Imam, S. 2008. Analysts' perceptions of earnings quality. Accounting & Business Research, 38(4): 313-329.
7.Barron, O. E., C. O. Kile & T. B. O’Keefe. 1999. MD&A Quality as Measured by the SEC and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1): 75-109.
8.Barth, M. 1994. Fair value accounting: evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. The Accounting Review. 69(1): 1-25.
9.Bens, D. A. & S. J. Monahan. 2004. Disclosure Quality and the Excess Value of Diversification. Journal of Accounting Research. 42(4): 691–730.
10.Berger, P. G., & Hann, R. 2003. The impact of SFAS no. 131 on information and monitoring. Journal of Accounting Reasearch. 42(2): 163-223.
11.Beaver, W. H. 2002. Perspectives on Recent Capital Market Research. The Accounting Review. 77(2): 453-474.
12.Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H., & Welker, M. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. Accounting Review, 78(3): 641-678.
13.Bostosan, C. A., & Standford, M. 2005. Managers’ Motives to Withhold Segment Disclosures and the Effect of SFAS NO. 131 on Analysts’ Information Environment. The Accounting Review. 80(3): 751-772.
14.Bowen, R. M., A. K. Davis and D. A. Matsumoto. 2002. Do Conference Calls Affect Analysts’ Forecasts. The Accounting Review. 77(2): 285-316.
15.Byard, D., K. W. Shaw. 2003. Corporate Disclosure Quality and Properties of Analysts’ Information Environment. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance. 18(3): 355-378.
16.Chen, P. and G. Zhang. 2003. Heterogeneous Investment Opportunities in Multiple-Segment Firms and the Incremental Value Relevance of Segment Accounting Data. The Accounting Review: 397–428.
17.David Salerno. 2014. The Role Of Earnings Quality In Financial Analyst Forecast Accuracy.The Journal of Applied Business Research 30(February): 257-260.
18.Dechow, P., & Skinner, D. 2000. Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2): 235-250.
19.Denis C., M.J. Ledoux, Michel M. & Walter. 2010. Corporate governance and information asymmetry between managers and investors. Corporate Governance,10 (5): 574-589.
20.Ernst & Young. 2004. Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards. International GAAP .
21.Fama, E. F., & M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26(June): 301-25.
22.Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. 2004. Costs of equity and earnings attributes. Accounting Review, 79(4): 967-1010.
23.Frankel, R., McNichols, M., & Wilson, G, P. 1995. Discretionary disclosure and external financing. Accounting Review, 70(1): 135-150.
24.Garcia-Teruel, P. J., Martinez-Solano, P., & Sanchez-Ballesta, J. 200. Accruals quality and corporate cash holdings. Accounting & Finance, 49(1): 95-115.
25.Han, B. H. & D. Manry. 2000. The Implications of Dispersion in Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts for Future ROE and Future Returns. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 27: 99-125
26.Ho, L. C. J., Hassell, J. M. & S. Swidler. 1995. An empirical examination of the dispersion and accuracy of analyst forecasts surrounding option listing. Review of Financial Economics, 4(2): 171-185.
27.Hope, O. K. 2003. Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and nalysts’forecast accuracy:an international study. Journal of Accounting Reasearch 41(2): 235-271.
28.Jennings, R. 1987. Unsystematic security price movements, management earnings forecasts, and revisions in consensus analyst earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 25 (Spring): 90-110.
29.Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4): 305-360.
30.Kao, L., & Chen, A. 2004. The effects of board characteristics on earnings management. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(3): 96-107.
31.Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3): 375-400.
32.Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. 1992. Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance, A. Bus. Law., 1(1): 59-77.
33.Marquardt, C. & Weidman, C. 1998. Voluntary disclosure, information asymmetry and insider selling through secondary equity offerings. Contemporary Accounting research, 15(4): 505-537.
34.Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. 2011. Corporate governance: Wiley.
35.Nagarajan, N., & S. Sridhar, S. 1996. Corporate Responses to Segment Disclosure Requirements, 21(2): 253-275.
36.Palepu, K. G., P. M. Healy & V. L. Bernard. 2004. Business Analysis and Valuation: Using Financial Statements Third Edition (Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western).
37.Parkash, M., D. S. Dhaliwal, & W. K. Salatka. 1995. How certain firm-specific characteristics affect the accuracy and dispersion of analysts’ forecasts:a latent variables approach. Journal of Business Research, 34(3) : 161-169.
38.Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3): 295-316.
39.Verrecchia, R. E. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5: 179-194.
40.Weber, D. P., 2009. Do Analysts and Investors Fully Appreciate the Implications of Book-Tax Differences for Future Earnings? Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(4): 1175-1206.
41.Wessel M. Badenhorst. Fair value intensity and analyst forecasts. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences.
42.Yu, F. F. 2008. Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2): 245-271.

(此全文未開放授權)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *