|
Agranovich, S., O, Ben & Assaraf, Z. (2012). What Makes Children Like Learning Science? An Examination of the Attitudes of Primary School Students towards Science Lessons. The journal of Science and Technology Education, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. p. 2-3.
Aikenhead.Glen S. (1995). Toward a First Nations Cross Cultural Science and Technology Curriculum. The journal of Science Education. University of Saskatchewan. Canada. 1- 52,
Aikenhead.Glen S. (1996-1997). Toward a First Nations Cross Cultural Science and Technology Curriculum. Science Education. University of Saskatchewan.
Aikenhead.Glen S. (1999). Cross-Cultural Science Education: A Cognitive Explanation of a cultural Phenomenon. Journal of research in science teaching. p.269-287
Aikenhead.Glen S. (2001). Students’ Ease in Crossing Cultural Borders into School Science. University of Saskatchewan. Canada. Vol.85,pp. 180-188.
Aikenhead.Glen S. (2001). IntegratingWestern and Aboriginal Sciences: Cross-Cultural Science Teaching. Research in Science Education. 31: 337–355.
Ali, M. S., & Awan, A. S. (2013). Attitude towards science and its relationship with students’ achievement in science. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(10), 707-718.
Allport, G.W. (1966). The nature of prejudice. Mass: Addison-wesley publishing
Appleton, K. (1995). Student teachers' confidence to teach science: Is more science knowledge necessary to improve self-confidence? International Journal of Science Education, 19, 357-369.
Atwater, M. M., Wiggins, J., & Gardner, C. M. (1995). A study of urban middle school students with high and low attitudes toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 665-677.
Bademci, V. (2006a). To put an end to the discussion: Cronbach's alpha coefficient can be used with dichotomously scored items [0,1]. Journal of Kâzım Karabekir Education Faculty, 13, 438- 446 in Turkish.
Bademci, V. (2006b). To understand reliability properly and to overthrow some clichés: Contrary to the known facts, Cronbach’s coefficient alpha can be negative and smaller than “–1”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 7(12), 3- 26 [in Turkish].
Baird, J. H., Lazarowitz, R., & Allman, V. (1984). Science choices and preferences of middle and secondary school students in Utah. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 47-54.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy and health behaviour. In A. Baum, S. Newman, J. Wienman, R. West, & C. McManus (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (pp. 160-162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baram-Tsabari, A., Yarden, A., Sethi, R. J., & Bry, L. (2009). Asking scientists: A decade of questions analyzed by age, gender, and country. Science Education, 93(1), 131-160.
Barlia, L. (1999). High School Students’ Motivation to Engage in Conceptual Change-Learning in Science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The Ohio State University
Barton.A.C. & Yang.K. (1999). The Culture of Power and Science Education: Learning from Miguel. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. P. Vol. 37, No. 8, Pp. 871±889
Breckler and Wiggins, 1992. Breckler, S.J., & Wiggins, E.C. (1992). On defining attitude and attitude theory: Once more with feeling. In A. R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler, & A. C. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 407-427). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: Reshaping the sciences of the future. Curriculum Studies, 26(4), 401±416.
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating Students to learn (2nd ed). Erlbaurn: Mahwah, NJ.
Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Madison, WI: McGraw Hill.
Cajete, G.A. (1999). Igniting the sparkle: An Indigenous science education model. Skyand, NC: Kivaki Press.
Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., & Henson, R. K. (2001). Measurement error of scores on the mathematics anxiety rating scale across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 373-386.
Cavas, B., Cavas, P., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Kesercioglu, T. (2009). Turkish students’ views on environmental challenges with respect to gender: an analysis of ROSE data. Science Education International, 20(1, 2), 69-78.
Cavas, P., (2011). “Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for science learning”. Science Education International. Faculty of Education, Ege University, Turkey.
Cherif, A., and M. Wideen. 1992. "The Problems of Transition from High School to University Science." Catalyst 36 (1).
Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22 (1), 17-31.
Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
Cobern, W. W., Gibson, A. T., & Underwood, S. A. (1996). Scientific literacy is a life-time skill. The Science Teacher, 62,28-31.
Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Teachers and Pupils Strategies for Effective Classroom Learning: Similarities and Contrasts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 163, 381-399.
Costa, V.B. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313- 333.
DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38, Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
den Brok, P., Fisher, D., Brekelmans, M., Rickards, T., Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (2003, April). Cross-cultural validity of the QTI: A comparison of the structure behind students’ perceptions of secondary science teachers’ interpersonal style between six countries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
Driver, R., Osoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5- 12.
Duschl, R.A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 467± 501.
Ebenezer, V.J. & Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 students’ perceptions of attitudes toward science teaching and school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30 (2), 175–186.
Edwards, D., & Mercer. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.
Eikos, U. (2005). The Role of Studentsʼ Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning in Online Language Courses. CALICO Journal, 23 (1), p-p 49-78.
Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. (1996). Creating the conditions for scienti®c literacy: A re-examination. American Education Research Journal. 33(2), 261±295.
Erickson, F. & Mohatt, G. (1982). Cultural organization of participation structures in two classrooms of Indian students. In G. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling, educational anthropology in action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Fägerlind, I., & Munck, I. (1981). Attitudes towards School and Education in Seven Countries. Comparisons between England, Finland, Hungary, India, Japan, Sweden and the USA Based on IEA Data. The Yellow Report Series 52. Institute of International Education: Stockholm University.
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Floden, R. E. (1986). The cultures of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 505-526). New York: Macmillan.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Floden, R. E. (1985). The role of rhetoric in changing teachers' beliefs. Teaching & Teacher Education, 1, 19-32.
Futuyma, D.J. 1963. Science on Trial: A Case for Evolution. New York: Pantheon.
Garcia T, Pintrich PR. (2005). The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the College Classroom Contemporary. Educational Psychology. 21: 477-486.
Gardner, P. L. (1995). Measuring attitudes to science. Research in Science Education, 25, 283–289.
Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., & Wilbur, C. J. (2006). Are “implicit“ attitudes unconscious? Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 485–499.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal Research Science Teaching, Madawaska High School.
Glock, S., & Carrie K. (2013). Educational Psychology: Using Insights from Implicit Attitude Measures. Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts, and Education, University of Luxembourg.
Gogolin, L. and Swartz, F. (1992). A quantitative and qualitative inquiry into the attitudes toward science of non science college majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 487–504.
Haladyna, T., Olsen, R., & Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Relations of student, teacher, and learning environmentvariables to attitudes toward science. Science Education, 66(5), 671-687.
Helms, J. V. & Carlone, H. B. (1999). Science education and the commonplaces of science. Science Education Journal. Volume 83, Issue 2 March 1999. Pages 233–245.
Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1-41.
Hasse.C. & Sinding. B.A., (2012). Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: The Cultural Context of Science Education. 248.
Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for multicultural science education. Science Education, 77, 685±711.
Hurlock, E. (1959). “Developmental Psychology”. A life span approach 5th Ed. Tata Mc Graw-Hill publishing company Ltd. New Delhi, P. 222.
Jebson.S.R & Amos.Z.H (2015). “Students` Attitude Towards Science Subjects In Senior Secondary Schools In Adamawa State, Nigeria”. International Journal of Research in Applied.
Jegede, O. & Okebukola, P. (1991). The effect of instruction on socio cultural beliefs hindering the learning of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (3), 275-285
Jegede, O. (1995), ‘Collateral Learning and the Eco-cultural Paradigm in Science and Mathematics Education in Africa’, Studies in Science Education 25, 97-137.
Kahle, J. B., & Rennie, L. J. (1993). Ameliorating Gender Differences in Attitudes about Science: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2(1), 321-334.
Kazempour, M. (2008). Expoloring Attitudes, Beliefs, And Self Efficacy Of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Enrolled In A Science Methods Course And Factors Responsible For Possible Changes. Indiana University. Philosophy of Education.
Keeves, J., ve Morgenstern, L. (1992). Attitudes Towards Science: Measures and Effects. In J. Keeves (Ed.), The IEA Study of Science III: Changes in Science Education and Achievement 1970-1984 Pregamon, Elmsford, NY.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computer: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 457-476.
Koballa, R. T., & Crawley, E. F. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics. 85 (83), 222–232.
Krech, D., Crutchfield, R.S., and Ballachey, E.L. (1962). Individual in society, NY:McGraw- Hill
Kurt, Ş., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2002). Fizik öğretiminde enerji konusunda geliştirilen çalışma yapraklarının uygulanması. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Kyle. (1988). An implementation study: An analysis of elementary students' and teachers' attitudes toward science in process-approach vs. traditional science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. (21).
Lee, O. (1989). Motivation to learning science in middle school classrooms. University Microfilms International. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing
Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 585–610.
Lynch, S. (1997). Novice teachers' encounter with national science education reform: Entanglements or intelligent interconnections? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 3±17.
Lugones, M. (1987). Playfulness, “world”-travelling, and loving perception. Hypatia, 2(2), 3–19.
Maddock, M. N. (1981). Science education: An anthropological viewpoint. Studies in Science Education, 8, 1–26.
Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. (1995). The learning environment as a site of science education reform. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 43-50.
Malcolm, C. (1989). Trends in school science curriculum and their implications for teacher education. Discipline Review of Teacher Education in Mathematics and Science, 3, 163-169.
Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2001). “Pupils” attitudes, perceptions and understanding of primary science: Comparisons between Northern Irish and English schools’. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Leeds, Leeds, and 13–15 September.
McKinley, E. (1998). Science curricula and cultural diversity: Are we doing enough for the aspirations of Maori? In D. Hodson (Ed.), Science and technology education and ethnicity: An Aotearoa/New Zealand Perspective. Wellington, New Zealand: The Royal Society of New Zealand, pp. 48-58.
Medvitz, A.G. (1985, August). Problems in the application of science education to national development. Paper presented at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
Moghaddam, F. M.. Social psychology: Exploring universals in social behavior. New York: Freeman, 1998.
Morrell, P. D., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). Students‟ attitudes toward school and classroom science: Are they independent phenomena? School Science and Mathematics, 98(2), 76-83.
Movahedzadeh F., “Improving Students’ Attitude Toward Science Through Blended Learning”, Science Education and Civic Engagement, 3(2), 2011.
Naylor.S., Downing.B., Keogh.B. (2007). Argumentation and Primary Science. Research in Science Education. 37 (1). 17-39
Neathery, M. F. (1997). Elementary and secondary students' perceptions toward science: Correlations with gender, ethnicity, ability, grade, and science achievement. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 11.
Ogawa, M. (1986). Toward a new rationale of science education in a non-western society. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 113–119.
O’Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a socioculturalmodel of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 791–820.
Ormerod, M. B., & Duckworth, D., (joint author.) (1975). Pupils' attitudes to science : a review of research. NFER, Windsor
Osborne, (2016). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education. P.1049-1081
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
OSBORNE, J. F. and COLLINS, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum (London: King’s College London).
Özçelik, D.A. (1998). Measurements and evaluation, Ankara: ÖSYM publications.
Parkinson, J., Hendley, D., Tanner, H. and Stables, A. (1998). Pupil’s attitudes to Science in Key Stage 3 of the National Curriculum: a study of pupils in South Wales. Research in Science and Technological Education, 16(2), 165-176.
Peat, D. (1994). Lighting the seventh fire. New York: Carol Publishing Group.
T. Pell & T. Jarvis (2001) Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal in Science Education. 23(8), 847-862
Petty, R. (1995). Attitude change. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology, New York: McGraw Hill.
Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647.
Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students' multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224-250.
Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Company.
Potter, Jonathan and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour.London, U.K.: Sage Publications Ltd.
Ramsden, Paul (1998). Managing the Effective University. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), 347-370
Raved Assaraf., (2010). Attitudes towards Science Learning among 10th‐Grade Students: A qualitative look. International Journal of Science Education. P. Vol. 33, No. 9, 1 June 2011, pp. 1219–1243.
Rennie, L., Goodrum, D., & Hacking, M. (2001). Science teaching and learning in Australian schools: Results of a national study. Research in Science Education, 31, 455-498.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), The handbook of research in teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.
Richter, F. D. & Tjosvold, D. (1980). Effects of student participation in classroom decision making on attitudes, peer interaction, motivation, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 74-80.
Sarjou. A. A., (2012). A Study of Iranian Students’ Attitude towards Science and Technology, School Science and Environment, Based on the ROSE Project. Journal of Studies in Education. P.90-104.
Schibeci, R. A. & Riley II, J. P. (1986). Influence of students’ background and perceptions on Science Attitude and achievement. Journal of Research Science Teaching. Volume 23, Issue 3March 1986. Pages 177–187.
Seferoğlu, S. S., (2004). Attitudes to teachers’ of the teacher candidates. XII. National Congress of Education Sciences, Ankara-Turkey: 413-425.
Pintrich, P. R. and Schunk, D. H., (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, Research, and 15. Application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Shah Z. A., Mahmood. N., and Harrison. C., (2013) Attitude towards Science Learning: An Exploration of Pakistani Students: Turkish Science Education; Pakistan. p1- 2.
Silvertsen, M. L. (1993). Transforming ideas for Teaching and Learning Science. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
SIMPSON, R. D. and OLIVER, J. S. (1990). A summary of the major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1–18.
Snively, G. (1990). Traditional Native Indian beliefs, cultural values, and science instruction. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 17(1), 44-59.
Sutherland, K. & Oswald, D. (2005). The Relationship Between Teacher and Student Behavior in Classrooms for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Transactional Processes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, March 2005. Pp 1-14.
Talton, E. L. & Simpson, R. D. (1987). Relationship of attitude toward classroom environment with attitude toward achievement in science among tenth grade biology students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
TARSH, J. (1994). Young people’s attitude to studying science. Unpublished study (London: Department for Education and Employment).
Tharp, R. (1989). Psychocultural variables and constraints: Effects on teaching and learning in schools. American Psychologist, 44, 349–359.
Tuan, Chin & Sheh (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, Vol 27(6), 634-659.
Tobin, K., Briscoe, C. & Holman, J. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74 (4), 409-420.
Tossavainen, T (2014). “A Survey on the Permanence of Finnish Students’ Arithmetical Skills and the Role of Motivation”.School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education, University of Eastern Finland.
Ushida, E., (2005). The Role of Students’ Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning in Online Language Courses. University of California, San Diego.
Sabine, G., & Kovacs, C. (2013). Educational Psychology: Using Insights from Implicit Attitude Measures. Educational Psychology. Vol. 25, Issue 4, pp 503–522.
Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation. Journal educational psychologist. Vol. 26, 1991- issue 3-4
Shah, Z., Mahmood, N & Harrison (2013). “Attitude towards Science Learning: An Exploration of Pakistani Students”. Journal of Turkish science Education. 10 (2) : 35-47.
Simpson, R. D. & Oliver, J. S. (1999). A summary of Major influence on students attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1-18.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Social Science book.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). “Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271-360.
Weinburgh, M. (1998). Gender Differences in Student Attitudes toward Science: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387-398.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.
|