帳號:guest(3.141.46.55)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:王郁婷
作者(英文):Yu-Ting Wang
論文名稱:企業資源及高階管理團隊組成之構形與環境策略積極度之關聯性:以海運業為例
論文名稱(英文):Configurations of firm resources and top management team composition for proactiveness of environmental strategy – Case of marine enterprises
指導教授:陳雯虹
指導教授(英文):Wein-Hong Chen
口試委員:郭國泰
陳建男
口試委員(英文):Guo-Tai Kuo
Chien-Nan Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學號:610532008
出版年(民國):107
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:110
關鍵詞:環境策略模糊集合質化比較分析法資源基礎理論高層理論
關鍵詞(英文):environmental strategyfuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)resource-based theoryupper echelons theory
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:40
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:6
  • 收藏收藏:0
海運產業在國際貿易上扮演重要角色,對環境保護亦負有重大責任。「綠色航運」近幾年逐漸受到各國的重視,目前台灣海運企業在環境保護之投入程度上仍有差異。過去環境策略的相關文獻,較多探討單一與多個因素各自對環境策略的影響,較少以組合的方式探討多個因素之構形與環境策略之關聯性,例如:多種資源的組合或多種資源與高階管理團隊特性之組合。本論文基於資源基礎理論與高層理論,探索哪些企業資源及高階管理團隊組成之組合,為影響環境策略積極度之充分條件。

本研究以台灣上市上櫃之海運企業為研究對象,透過兩階段研究,第一階段採用Eisenhardt (1989) 個案研究法,探索可能影響環境策略積極度的重要因素,第二階段根據第一階段找出的重要因素,運用 Ragin (2009) 所提出之模糊集合質化比較分析法,分析何種企業資源與高階管理團隊組成之構形,為影響環境策略積極度之關鍵因素組合。

研究結果顯示四種可能影響環境策略積極度之充分條件構形。分別為:「保守網絡型小資本企業_高素質低衝突管理團隊」、「豐富網絡型小資本企業_環境及創新導向低衝突之管理團隊」、「豐富網絡型大資本企業_環境導向及思考多元管理團隊」、「豐富網絡型大資本企業_員工與管理團隊具環境前瞻導向」。針對小資本海運企業,本研究建議同質的高階管理團隊有助於提升環境策略積極度,針對大資本具豐富網絡資源之海運企業,本研究建議網絡需要較豐富,且異質的高階管理團隊有助於提升環境策略積極度。
The Maritime industry plays an important role on international trade and environmental protection. In recent years, countries around the world have gradually pay attention to ‘green shipping’. However, marine enterprises in Taiwan have devoted different amount of effort on environmental protection. Up to date, most of the research on environmental strategies has focused on investigating the idiosyncratic effect of distinctive factors on environmental strategies. Limited research has explored how the combinations of multiple factors, such as configurations of various resources and top management team characteristics, influence environmental strategies. Based on resource-based theory and upper echelons theory, this study seeks to explore configurations of firm resources and top management team composition for proactiveness of environmental strategy.

The case firms of this study are TSE-listed or OTC-listed marine enterprises in Taiwan. This study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the qualitative case study method proposed by Eisenhardt’s (1989) was adopted to explore critical resource-based factors that may potentially affect firms’ environmental strategy proactiveness. In the second stage, Ragin’s (2009) fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis was adopted to explore equifinal configurations of the critical factors identified in the first stage that sufficiently explain proactiveness of environmental strategy.

The result of this study suggest four sufficient configurations that lead to higher proactiveness of environmental strategy. The four configurations were named as: 1. small enterprises with limited capital resources and conservative networks, under the leadership of a highly-educated management team that has low incidence of team conflicts, 2. small enterprises with limited capital resources and abundant network resources, under the leadership of an environment- and innovation-oriented management team that has low incidence of team conflicts, 3. large enterprises with abundant capital and network resources, under the leadership of a diversified and environment-oriented management team, and 4. large enterprises with abundant capital and network resources as well as highly educated employees, under the leadership of an environment-oriented management team. This study suggests that for small enterprises with limited capital resources, homogeneous management teams would contribute to environmental strategy proactiveness. For large enterprises with abundant capital and network resources, this study suggests that diversified management team would contribute to environmental strategy proactiveness.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 7
第三節 研究流程 8
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 環境策略 11
第二節 資源與環境策略 19
第三節 研究架構 26
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究設計與研究對象 27
第二節 資料蒐集方法 44
第三節 變數定義與衡量 46
第四節 資料分析方法 59
第四章 研究結果 61
第一節 個案研究發現 61
第二節 fsQCA研究結果 67
第五章 研究結論與討論 77
第一節 研究結論 77
第二節 研究貢獻 83
第三節 研究限制與建議 85
參考文獻 87
附錄 97

一、中文文獻
朱世琳 (2008),研發、研發外溢與員工學歷結構差異對台灣資訊電子業研發廠商生產力之貢獻,經濟論文叢刊,36卷4期,第515-550頁。

吳淑鶯、陳瑞和、陳燕柔 (2013),綠色營運策略之影響前因與績效評估關係,國際學報,中華管理評論,16卷3期,第1-28頁。

張正賢 (2009),核心職能,教育訓練與工作績效關係之研究—以定期海運業為例,成功大學交通管理科學系學位論文,第1-126頁。

黃延聰 (2011),策略聯盟如何成功?聯盟過程之管理,T&D飛訊,95期,第1-15頁。

楊正行 (2010),航運業在全球氣候變遷下提升綠色競爭力之研究,中華技術,85期,第40-51頁。

楊厚華 (1992),公民營貨櫃輪運輸業資本結構與經營績效之分析-長榮與陽明海運個案比較,交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,第1-80頁。

劉亞寧 (2013),定期航運業經營四方物流關鍵能力之研究,航運季刊,22卷4期,第71-91頁。

蕭婉鎔、黃同圳 (2009),策略性人力資源管理理論之驗證-普遍性、構形、及權變觀點,管理與系統,16卷1期,第1-23頁。

二、英文文獻
Allison, P. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American sociological review, 43(6) 865-880.

Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic management journal, 14(1), 33-46.

Anton, W. R. Q., Deltas, G., & Khanna, M. (2004). Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(1), 632-654.

Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88.

Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rubio-López, E. A. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: Myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 357-381.

Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88-103.

Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic management journal, 10(S1), 107-124.

Bantel, K. A. (1993). Top team, environment, and performance effects on strategic planning formality. Group & Organization Management, 18(4), 436-458.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106-122.

Buysse K, Verbeke A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470.

Barbieri, J. C. (2004). Gestão ambiental empresarial. São Paulo: Saraiva.

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hal.

Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Pollution reduction preferences of US environmental managers: Applying Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 627-641.

Cordano, M., Frieze, I. H., & Ellis, K. M. (2004). Entangled affiliations and attitudes: An analysis of the influences on environmental policy stakeholders' behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 27-40.

Cordano, M., Marshall, R. S., & Silverman, M. (2010). How do small and medium enterprises do “green”? A study of environmental management programs in the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(3), 463-478.

Castanias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. (2001). The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 27(6), 661-678.

Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management journal, 44(3), 533-545.

Campbell, J. T., Sirmon, D. G., & Schijven, M. (2016). Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 163-187.

Donaire, D. (1994). Considerações sobre a influencia da variável ambiental na empresa. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 34(2), 68-77.

Donaire, D. (1999). Gestão Ambiental na empresa. São Paulo:Atlas. 
Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Bamford, C. E. (1998). Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: Strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 709-728.

Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner Jr, R. A. (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 565-574.

Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072-1094.

Doyle, M. W., & Von Windheim, J. (2015). Environmental management strategy: Four forces analysis. Environmental Management, 55(1), 6-18.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures. Administrative science quarterly, 35(3), 504-529.

Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.

Gangadharan, L. (2006). Environmental compliance by firms in the manufacturing sector in Mexico. Ecological Economics, 59(4), 477-486.

Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58.

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206.

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014. 

Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381-395.

Jones, N., & Klassen, R. D. (2001). “Management of pollution prevention: Integrating environmental technologies in manufacturing.” Greener manufacturing and operations: From design to delivery to take back. Greenleaf Publishing Limited, 56-68.

Jabbour, C. J. C., & Santos, F. C. A. (2006), The evolution of environmental management withinorganizations: toward a common taxonomy. Environmental Quality Management, 16(2), 43-59.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.

Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of management journal, 24(4), 689-713.

Klassen, R., & McLaughlin, C. (1996), The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-214.

Lawler III, E. E. (1986). High-Involvement Management. Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco.

López‐Gamero, M. D., Molina‐Azorín, J. F., & Claver‐Cortes, E. (2011). The relationship between managers' environmental perceptions, environmental management and firm performance in Spanish hotels: a whole framework. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13(2), 141-163.

Lewis, B. W., Walls, J. L., & Dowell, G. W. (2014). Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 712-722. 

Liu, Y., Guo, J., & Chi, N. (2015). The antecedents and performance consequences of proactive environmental strategy: A meta-analytic review of national contingency. Management and Organization Review, 11(3), 521-557.

Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Maimon, D. (1994). Eco-estratégia nas empreas brasileiras: realidade ou discurso?. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 34(4), 119-130.

Marino, K. E. (1996). Developing consensus on firm competencies and capabilities. The Academy of Management Executive, 10(3), 40-51.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886.

Miles, M. & Covin, J. (2000). Environmental marketing: a source of reputational, competitive and financial advantage, Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 299-311.

Molina-Azorín, J. F., Claver-Cortés, E., López-Gamero, M. D., & Tarí, J. J. (2009). Green management and financial performance: a literature review. Management Decision, 47(7), 1080-1100.

Nakao, Y., Amano, A., Matsumura, K., Genba, K., & Nakano, M. (2007), Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(2), 106-18.

Oswald, S. L., Mossholder, K. W., & Harris, S. G. (1994). Vision salience and strategic involvement: Implications for psychological attachment to organization and job. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 477-489.

Oghojafor, B. E. A., & Ogunkoya, O. A. (2016). Business resources and capabilities as drivers of environmental strategy: A case study of the Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation (NTDC). International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 8(4), 224-241. 

Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley: New York.

Pickernell, D., Senyard, J., Jones, P., Packham, G., & Ramsey, E. (2013). New and young firms: Entrepreneurship policy and the role of government–evidence from the Federation of Small Businesses survey.
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(2), 358-382.

Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1(1), 11-24.

Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.

Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee “Ecoinitiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 605-626.

Rohrich, S. S., & Cunha, J. C. D. (2004). A proposição de uma taxonomia para análise da gestão ambiental no Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 8(4), 81-97.

Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA).

Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American sociological review, 13(1), 25-35.

Smart, J. C., & Pascarella, E. T. (1986). Self-concept development and educational degree attainment. Higher Education, 15(1-2), 3-15.

Shrivastava, P. (1995). Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 118-137.

Sambharya, R. B. (1996). Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of US multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17(9), 739-746. 

Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729-753.

Sanches, C. S. (2000). Gestão ambiental proativa. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 40(1), 76-87.

Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., & Ireland, R.D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273-292.

Shen, M. (2009). Corporate environmental strategy and practices: Antecedents and consequences. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I.

Sindhi, S., & Kumar, N. (2012). Corporate environmental responsibility - transitional and evolving. Management of Environmental Quality, 23(6), 640-657.

Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(5), 595-619.

Tange, H. (2005). Kigyo keiei no shakaisei kenkyu. A Study on the Social Context of Corporate Management.

Tomomi, T. (2009). Environmental management strategy For small and medium-sized enterprises: Why do SMBs practice environmental management?. Asian Business and Management, 9(2), 265-280.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.

Willig, J. T. (1994). Environmental TQM. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Wagner, M., Nguyen, V. P., Azomahou, T., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2002). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis of the european paper industry.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(3), 133-46. 

Walker, K., Ni, N., & Huo, W. (2014). Is the red dragon green? An examination of the antecedents and consequences of environmental proactivity in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 27-43.

Yu, C. C., & Chen, C. S. (2014). From the actual practice of corporate environmental strategy to the creation of a suggested framework of corporate environmental responsibility. Environmental Engineering Science, 31(2), 61-70.

Zabkar, V., Cater, T., Bajde, D., & Cater, B. (2013). Environmental strategy: A typology of companies based on managerial perceptions of customers´ environmental activeness and deterrents. E&M Economics a Management, 16(3), 57-74.

三、網路資料
台灣證券交易所,公開資訊觀測站,上網日期:2017年9月15日,檢自http://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/t146sb05。

Alphaliner-Top 100海運貨櫃量評比的網站,上網日期:2017年10月20日,檢自https://alphaliner.axsmarine.com/PublicTop100/。

國際海運公會 (International Chamber of Shipping),”Comparison of CO2 Emissions by Different Modes of Transport”,上網日期:2017年10月20日,檢自 http://www.ics-shipping.org/shipping-facts/environmental-performance/comparison-of-co2-emissions-by-different-modes-of-transport。

Money DJ理財網,上網日期:2017年12月7日,檢自https://www.moneydj.com/。
交通部航港局,上網日期:2017年10月14日,檢自http://data.motcmpb.gov.tw/。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top

相關論文

1. 管理資源及組織資源之構形與企業社會責任績效之關聯性
2. 企業資源及高階管理團隊組成之構形與企業轉型績效-以台灣紡織業轉型至自有品牌廠商為例
3. 經營團隊經歷構形與金融風暴後中小企業快速成長之關聯性
4. 高階管理團隊組成特性之構形與金融風暴後績效成長:以觀光廠商為例
5. 高階管理團隊異質性對服務業廠商國際化程度之影響:高階管理團隊規模之干擾效果
6. 台灣電子產業自有品牌廠商高階管理團隊異質性與廠商績效關係之研究 :市場導向程度之干擾效果
7. 台灣新創事業高階管理團隊異質性對金融風暴後公司績效之影響:國際化程度之 調節效果
8. 高階管理團隊異質性與國際市場探索之關聯性:管理學習觀點
9. 台灣企業母國經驗發展年資與國際化能力之關聯性:高階管理團隊異質性之干擾效果
10. 兩次金融風暴後管理資源組成變化與公司績效變化之關聯性
11. 高階管理團隊特性構形與企業策略變革績效之關聯性
12. 高階管理團隊組成與企業資源之構形與金融風暴後初始國際化績效之關聯性-以電子產業廠商為例
13. 夥伴多元性與服務創新之關聯性:吸收能耐與國際化廣度之調節效果
14. 組織變革決策流程之探索研究- 以經歷變革之實驗小學為例
15. 合作夥伴地域之環境先進度與企業環境績效之關聯:組織創新氛圍與國際化廣度之調節效果
 
* *