帳號:guest(13.58.7.43)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:鄭智文
作者(英文):Zheng Zhiwen
論文名稱:以CAGE模型探討中國大陸雙向直接投資之影響因素
論文名稱(英文):Using CAGE Model to Explore the Influencing Factors of Two-way Direct Investment in Mainland China
指導教授:王廷升
指導教授(英文):Timothy Tingson Wang
口試委員:陳啟斌
連志峰
口試委員(英文):Chi-Bein Chen
Chih-Feng Lien
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學號:610533012
出版年(民國):108
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:48
關鍵詞:CAGE模型複合式距離國際貿易國家文化海外直接投資對中國直接投資
關鍵詞(英文):CAGE modelcompound distanceinternational tradenational cultureoverseas directinvestment (FDI)
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:3
  • 收藏收藏:0
中國是屬於一個開發中的的國家,若需要創造更多收益需要吸引已開發的國家來進行投資且廣大的市場也造就與各國貿易及海外直接投資的程度相當高,這也造就成中國經濟成長不可或缺的動力。因此,本論文想藉由實證研究,來探討複合式距離(Compounded Distance)對於直接投資量的影響程度。本研究以CAGE模型為基礎,並以近七年(2011-2017)中國主要海外直接投資的20個國家,來探討他們與中國的海外直接投資是否與國家距離(Country Distance)之變化有直接之關係。本研究採用中國商務部所記載之資料,分為中國雙向海外直接投資做討論,並以CAGE模型分析中國與其海外直接投資國家間的行為。本研究結果顯示,複合式距離的確會對國與國之間的海外直接投資量有相當的影響。另外本研究也發現,過去對於地理距離以及對外直接投資之間的研究結果與本研究的結果相符,意即兩國地理距離越大,兩國間的海外直接投資量越小。文化距離中不確定規避因素呈現顯著亦符合本研究假說。
China belongs to a developing country. If it is necessary to create more profits, it needs to attract the developed countries to invest, and the vast market also creates high levels of trade with other countries and direct overseas investment. This also leads to China’s economic growth. Indispensable motivation. Therefore, this article attempts to explore the extent to which the Compounded Distance influences the amount of direct investment by empirical research. This study is based on the CAGE model, and in 20 countries of China's major overseas direct investment in the past seven years (2011-2017), to explore whether their direct overseas investment with China has a direct relationship with the change of the country from CountryDistance. This research uses the data recorded by the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China and is divided into two-way overseas direct investment in China for discussion purposes. It also uses the CAGE model to analyze the behavior between China and its overseas direct investment countries. The results of this study show that composite distance rafts do have a considerable impact on the amount of overseas direct investment between countries. In addition, this study also found that the past research results between geographical distance and foreign direct investment are consistent with the results of this study, which means that the larger the geographical distance between the two countries, the smaller the amount of overseas direct investment between the two countries.
Keywords: CAGE model, compound distance, international trade, national culture, overseas direct investment (FDI), direct investment in China
第一章 緒論...... 1
第一節 研究背景....1
第二節 研究動機....1
第三節 研究目的....2
第四節 研究流程.... 2
第二章 文獻探討...... 4
第一節 國際企業貿易文獻概述.......6
第二節 區域經濟整合............8
第三節 CAGE理論........14
第四節 FDI理論概述....... 17
第五節 中國FDI概述........ 20
第六節 研討假說之探討.......22
第三章 研究方法.........25
第一節 研究架構與假說...... 26
第二節 研究對象及研究期間 ......26
第三節 定義變數及說明....... 27
第四章 統計結果.......... 30
第一節 敘述統計分析.......30
第二節 相關分析......31
第三節 假說驗證......32
第四節 檢定結果討論.......38
第五章 結論與建議.......... 42
第一節 結論........ 42
第二節 研究貢獻......42
第三節 後續研究建議........ .43
參考文獻...................44
參考文獻
中文部分
1.毛亮鈞(2015),「國內生產總值、出口和外人投資的因果關係:以厄瓜多
爾及哥倫比亞為例」。中國文化大學商學院財務金融學系碩士論文。
2.李國賓(2004),直接對外投資與貿易的替代互補性—引力模型的應用。世新大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
3.陳怡柔(2009)中國對外直接投資之實證研究。淡江大學/國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士論文。
4.郭建中、王國臣(2015)。國際直接投資理論回顧與實驗檢驗:被忽略的
母國特徵。人文及社會科學集刊。
5.許佑淵(1989),外人投資理論之研究<產業金融季刊>第64 期。
6.崔欽清(2009),關於文化差異會如何影響FDI進入模式的文獻綜述。
7.張育瑄(2014),美國與中國在亞太區域的競逐—以TPP 為核心。
8.梁卓勛(2016),國家距離與國際貿易關聯性之研究─以台灣與主要貿易國家。國立東華大學管理學院高階經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
9.黃智聰、歐陽宏(2006),世界各國對中國大陸直接投資決定因素之研究<遠景基金會季刊第七卷第二期>。
10.劉玉茹(2013),文化差異對跨國公司在華投資模式的影響。
11.劉默容、李鎧如、楊宗翰、李璨宇、廖學能、李蘊恆(2012),「世界經濟論壇(WEF)『全球競爭力』及世界銀行 『經商環境報告』國際評比所列金融指標之研究。

英文部分
1.Asiedu, E. (2002),“On the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries: Is Africa Different?” World Development. 30,50-54.
2.Balassa, B. (1961),Towards a theory of economic integration.
3.Brouwer ,J., Paap, R. and J.M Viaene , (2008),The trade and FDI effects of EMU enlargement ,27( 2), 188-208.
4.Coase, R. H. (1937),“The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4-16.
5.Dunning, J. H. (1981),International Production and the Multinational Enterprise 4, 40-50.
6.David, W. L. and E.G. Stephen, (1995),“Policy and Non-policy Determinants of U.S. Equity Foreign Direct Investment, ”Journal of International Business Studies 26(2),132-144.
7.Eric, W.B. and , L. Samuelson (1986),“Tax Holidays as Signals,”The American Economic Review, 76(4),88-94.
8.Egger,P. H. and W. Hannes, (2005),“Evidence on Corruption as an Incentive for Foreign Direct Investment,” European Journal of Political Economy, 21(4).159-180.
9.Francis, F. (2012),“The Future of History: Can Liberal Democracy Survive the Decline of the Middle Class?” Foreign Affairs 91(1),252-267.
10.Globerman,S. and D.M. Shapiro, (1999),“The Impact of Government Policies on Foreign Direct Investment: The Canadian Experience,” Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3),188-209.
11.Ghemawat ,P. (2007),Redefining Global Strategy,109-118.
12.Halper, S. (2010), The Beijing Consensus: How China’s Authoritarian Model Will Dominate the Twenty-first Century,140-152.
13.Hofstede,G.H,Berry.J.W. and W.J. Lonner, (1980) , Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values,15-35.
14.Hymer,S. (1960),“The International Operations of National firms:A study of Direct Foreign Investment,195-197.
15.Ian, B. (2009),“State Capitalism Comes of Age: The End of the Free Market?”Foreign Affairs .88,111-123.
16.Kawai, M. and Urata, S. (1998),Are trade and direct investment substitutes or complements? An empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturing industries, 59-79.
17.Kojima, K. (1973),“A Macroeconomic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment,”
18.Kreinin, Mordechai,E. , Michael, G.,Effects of regional integration on FDI: An empirical approach,20-42.
19.Noland, M. (1996),US-China Economic Relations,42-55.
20.Ozawa,T. (1979),“ International Investment and Industrial Structure: New Theoretical Implications from the Japanese Experience.”,72-82.
21.Peter,J. and Mark,C. (1976),The Future of the Multinational Enterprise .1l(3), 32-65.
22.Park,I. and Park,S. (2008),Reform creating regional trade agreements and foreign direct investment: applications for East Asia,70-89.
23.Pourshahabi, Soderjani and Mahmoudinia (2013),Panel Causality Relationship among FDI and Trade (Evidence from 16 Advanced Europe Countries),35-47.
24.QingZhang (2001)、BruceFelmingham (2001) The relationship between inward direct foreign investment and China's provincial export trade,102-119.
25.Rugman,A.M.,Verbeke ,A. and Nguyen,Q.T.K. (2011,Fifty Years of International Business Theory and Beyond.) ,79-96.
26.Shambaugh,D. (2013) China Goes Global: The Partial Power,54-66.
27.Stone,F.S. and,B.M. Jeon (2000),Foreign direct investment and trade in the Asia- Pacific region: complementarity, distance and regional economic integration ,53(3),99-112.
28.Tuman,J.P. and C.F. Emmert, (2004)“The Political Economy of U.S. Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America: A Reappraisal,” Latin American Research Review,39(2)179-192.
29.Vernon,R. (1966),“International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle.”Quarterly Journal of Economics,42-58.

相關網站
1.Google Map
https://www.google.com.tw/maps/@23.4857501,120.0843006,7z?hl=zh-TW
2.Hofstede centre 公開資訊網站資料庫中各國文化維度
https://www.hofstede-insights.com/
3.世界銀行
https://www.shihang.org/
4.全球經濟指標網站之經濟自由指標
https://stock-ai.com/Economic
(此全文未開放授權)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *