帳號:guest(18.227.72.212)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:Douglas Glenn Bast
作者(英文):Douglas Glenn Bast
論文名稱:FACTORS THAT AFFECT CONSUMERS PURCHASE INTENTION OF GMO FOOD STUFFS: A CROSS CULTURAL STUDY
論文名稱(英文):FACTORS THAT AFFECT CONSUMERS PURCHASE INTENTION OF GMO FOOD STUFFS: A CROSS CULTURAL STUDY
指導教授:夏締青
指導教授(英文):Mohammad Shadab Khalil
口試委員:王智弘
鄭明松
口試委員(英文):Chih-Hung Wang
Cheng Ming-Sung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學號:610533017
出版年(民國):109
畢業學年度:108
語文別:英文
論文頁數:81
關鍵詞:轉基因食品台灣購買意向生產定位
關鍵詞(英文):Genetically modified foodTaiwanPurchase intentionProduction positioning
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:1
  • 點閱點閱:36
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:29
  • 收藏收藏:0
目的–這項研究旨在在跨文化研究中調查影響GMO Food消費者購買意願的因素。

設計/方法/方法–數據通過問卷調查從台灣和美國收集。

調查結果–該研究發現,產品定位(非GMO,某些GMO和GMO)會影響消費者的購買意願,與GMO產品相比,在非GMO產品中觀察到的購買意願更高。支持長期定位(高與低)對產品定位和消費者購買意願之間關係的調節作用。該研究結果不支持產品認證(政府與私人)對產品定位和消費者購買意願之間關係的調節作用。同樣在中介作用方面,人們發現,轉基因生物的懷疑態度和健康風險介導了產品定位(非轉基因,某些轉基因和轉基因)與消費者購買意願之間的關係。

原創性/價值–這項研究試圖在美國和台灣之間進行真正的跨文化研究,以驗證消費者的購買意願是否存在差異以及其原因。
Purpose – This study aims to investigate the factors that affect consumer purchase intentions of GMO Food in a cross-cultural study.

Design/methodology/approach – The data was collected from Taiwan and USA via questionnaire.

Findings – This study found that product positioning (Non-GMO, Some GMO, and GMO) affects consumers’ purchase intentions with higher purchase intentions observed in Non-GMO Products compared to the GMO products. The moderating effect of long-term orientation (high versus low) on the relationship between product positioning and consumers’ purchase intention was supported. The study results do not support the moderating effect of product certification (government vs private) on the relationship between product positioning and consumers’ purchase intention. Also in terms of mediating role, it is found that skepticism and perceived health risks of GMO mediate the relationship between product positioning (Non-GMO, Some GMO, and GMO) and consumers purchase intentions.

Originality/value – This research attempted a truly cross-cultural study between the USA and Taiwan in order to verify if any difference in the purchase intention of consumers is present and why it occurs.
Chapter 1 Introduction 1

1.1. Research Background 1

1.2. Research Gap 2

1.3. Research Purpose and Questions 3

1.4. Significance of the Study 4

Chapter 2 Literature Review 6

2.1. Positioning 6

2.2. Long Term Orientation 6

2.3. Certification 7

2.4. Skepticism 8

2.5. Perceived Health Risks 8

2.6. Purchase Intention 9

Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework and Research Hypotheses 10

3.1. Theoretical Framework 10

3.2. Research Hypotheses 11

3.2.1. Direct Effect of GMO Positioning on Purchase Intention 11

3.2.2. Moderating Effect of Long-Term Orientation on Purchase Intention 12

3.2.3. Moderating Effect of Certification on Purchase Intention 12

2.7.4. Serial Mediation Effect of Skepticism and Perceived Health Risk on Purchase Intention 14

Chapter 4 Methodology & Data Analysis 16

4.1. Empirical Overview 16

4.2. Data Collection 16

4.3. Study 1 17

4.3.1. Design and Participants 17

4.3.2. Procedure 17

4.3.3. Manipulation Check for Products’ Level of Genetic Composition 18

4.3.4. Test of Hypothesis 1 18

4.3.4. Test of Hypothesis 2 19

4.4. Study 2 20

4.4.1. Design and Participants 20

4.4.2. Procedure 20

4.4.3. Manipulation Check for Products’ Level of Genetic Composition 21

4.4.4. Manipulation Check for Product Certification 21

4.4.5. Test of Hypothesis 3 21

4.5. Study 3 23

4.5.1. Design and Participants 23

4.5.2. Procedure 23

4.5.3. Manipulation Check for Products’ Level of Genetic Composition 23

4.5.4. Test of Hypothesis 4 24

Chapter 5 General Discussion 25

5.1. Discussion 25

5.2. Theoretical and Managerial Implications 26

5.3. Study Limitations and Future Research Direction 27

References 28

Appendix A: Study 1 Questionnaires 35

Non-GMO (Chinese) 35

Some GMO (Chinese) 37

GMO (Chinese) 39

Non-GMO (English) 41

Some GMO (English) 43

GMO (English) 45

Appendix B: Study 2 Questionnaires 47

Non-GMO, Government Certification (Chinese) 47

Non-GMO, Private Certification (Chinese) 50

Some GMO, Government Certification (Chinese) 53

Some GMO, Private Certification (Chinese) 56

GMO, Government Certification (Chinese) 59

GMO, Private Certification (Chinese) 62

Appendix C: Study 3 Questionnaires 65

Non-GMO (Chinese) 65

Some GMO (Chinese) 68

GMO (Chinese) 71
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., & Flanders, N. A. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Almendrala, A. (2016, August 3). What The Science Really Says About GMOs And Food Safety: A new Gmo labeling law ignores scientific consensus. Huffpost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/that-new-gmo-labeling-law-doesnt-align-with-scientific-consensus-on-gmo-safety_n_57a0ca4ae4b0693164c2c3a6.

Baker, G. (2001). The market for genetically modified foods: consumer characteristics and policy implications. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 4(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7508(02)00063-0

Banterle, A., & Ricci, E. C. (2013). Does the Sustainability of Food Products Influence Consumer Choices? The Case of Italy. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.164791

Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions With Regard to Genetically Modified Food – Results of a Cross-National Survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(1), 23–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010950406128

Chen, M.-F. (2007). Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: Moderating effects of food-related personality traits. Food Quality and Preference, 18(7), 1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.004

The Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-Free Dimensions of Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002187018002002

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003

Fearne, A. (1998). The evolution of partnerships in the meat supply chain: insights from the British beef industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(4), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598549810244296

Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_15

Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Aaron, J. I. (1998). Consumer acceptance of transgenic crops. Pesticide Science, 52(4), 388–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9063(199804)52:43.0.co;2-f

Frewer, L. J., Lans, I. A. V. D., Fischer, A. R., Reinders, M. J., Menozzi, D., Zhang, X., … Zimmermann, K. L. (2013). Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 30(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2013.01.003

Furrer, O., Liu, B. S.-C., & Sudharshan, D. (2000). The Relationships between Culture and Service Quality Perceptions. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024004

Golodner, L. F., Mayer, R. N., & Scammon, D. L. (1993). Healthy Confusion for Consumers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12(1), 130–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569501200113

Han, J.-H., & Harrison, R. W. (2007). Factors Influencing Urban Consumers' Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(4), 700–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00382.x

Hingston, S. T., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2018). Why Consumers Don't see the Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods, and what Marketers can do about It. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.17.0100

Hoefkens, C., Verbeke, W., & Camp, J. V. (2011). European consumers’ perceived importance of qualifying and disqualifying nutrients in food choices. Food Quality and Preference, 22(6), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.03.002

Hoek, J., & Jones, S. C. (2011). Regulation, public health and social marketing: a behaviour change trinity. Journal of Social Marketing, 1(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761111104419

Hoewe, J. (2017). Manipulation Check. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0135

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Hofstede, G. (2020, July 21). Country Comparison - Taiwan, The USA. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/taiwan,the-usa/.

Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

Joireman, J. A., Lange, P. A. M. V., & Vugt, M. V. (2004). Who Cares about the Environmental Impact of Cars? Environment and Behavior, 36(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251476

Kerr, W. A. (1999). Genetically modified organisms, consumer scepticism and trade law: implications for the organisation of international supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598549910264743

Kerr, W. A. (1999). Genetically modified organisms, consumer scepticism and trade law: implications for the organisation of international supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598549910264743

Klerck, D., & Sweeney, J. C. (2007). The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychology and Marketing, 24(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20157

Knight, A. (2007). Intervening Effects of Knowledge, Morality, Trust, and Benefits on Support for Animal and Plant Biotechnology Applications. Risk Analysis, 27(6), 1553–1563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00988.x

Kothamasi, D., & Vermeylen, S. (2010). Genetically modified organisms in agriculture: can regulations work? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13(3), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3

Kuttschreuter, M. (2006). Psychological Determinants of Reactions to Food Risk Messages. Risk Analysis, 26(4), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00799.x

Lefebvre, S., Cook, L. A., & Griffiths, M. A. (2019). Consumer perceptions of genetically modified foods: a mixed-method approach. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-12-2016-2043

Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., & Kvasova, O. (2010). Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13-14), 1319–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2010.523710

Leyser, O. (2014). Moving beyond the GM Debate. PLoS Biology, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001887

Loureiro, M. L., & Hine, S. (2004). Preferences and willingness to pay for GM labeling policies. Food Policy, 29(5), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.07.001

Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1086/209192

Moon, W., & Balasubramanian, S. K. (2004). Public Attitudes toward Agrobiotechnology: The Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions on the Impact of Trust, Awareness, and Outrage. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00170.x

Noseworthy, T. J., & Trudel, R. (2011). Looks Interesting, but what does it Do? Evaluation of Incongruent Product form Depends on Positioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6), 1008–1019. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0384

Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03

Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2000). On the Origin and Distinctness of Skepticism toward Advertising. Marketing Letters, 11(4), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008181028040

Phillips, D. M., & Hallman, W. K. (2013). Consumer Risk Perceptions and Marketing Strategy: The Case of Genetically Modified Food. Psychology & Marketing, 30(9), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20642

Rozin, P. (2006). The integration of biological, social, cultural and psychological influences on food choice. The Psychology of Food Choice, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990323.0019

Rozin, P., Spranca, M., Krieger, Z., Neuhaus, R., Surillo, D., Swerdlin, A., & Wood, K. (2004). Preference for natural: instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines. Appetite, 43(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.03.005

Saher, M., Lindeman, M., & Hursti, U.-K. K. (2006). Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods. Appetite, 46(3), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.01.015

Saletan, W. (2015, July 15). Unhealthy Fixation: The war against genetically modified organisms is full of fearmongering, errors, and fraud. Labeling them will not make you safer. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/07/are_gmos_safe_yes_the_case_against_them_is_full_of_fraud_lies_and_errors.html.

Sarigöllü, E. (2008). A Cross-Country Exploration of Environmental Attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 41(3), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507313920

Scientific American. (2013, September 1). Labels for Gmo Foods Are a Bad Idea: Mandatory labels for genetically modified foods are a bad idea. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/labels-for-gmo-foods-are-a-bad-idea/.

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2000). Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: text and annexes.

Sheehan, M. (2009). Making Sense of the Immorality of Unnaturalness. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/s096318010909029x

Silvestri, C., Cirilli, M., Zecchini, M., Muleo, R., & Ruggieri, A. (2016). Consumer Acceptance of the New Red-Fleshed Apple Variety. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 24(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2016.1244023

Simeone, M., Scarpato, D., & Marinelli, N. (2016). Factors Affecting Food Label Complexity: Does the New EU Regulation Satisfy Consumer Issues? An Exploratory Study. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22(5), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2015.1121422

Sjöberg, L. (2000). Perceived risk and tampering with nature. Journal of Risk Research, 3(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870050132568
Takala, T. (2004). The (Im)Morality of (Un)Naturalness. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 13(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180104131046

Valente, M., & Chaves, C. (2018). Perceptions and valuation of GM food: A study on the impact and importance of information provision. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4110–4118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.042

Wireless News. (2013, October 13). Multi-sponsor surveys’ study of clean food & beverage labels finds consumer confidence in food safety declines. Wireless News. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1441468328?accountid%C2%BC10534.

Wu, F., Swait, J., & Chen, Y. (2019). Feature-based attributes and the roles of consumers' perception bias and inference in choice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.12.003
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top

相關論文

1. 消費者購買基因改造食物的意欲的決定因素:文化及對宗教的熱誠的中介作用
2. The Effectiveness of Influencers on Instagram in Making Endorsements that Affect Purchase Intention
3. 電視廣告對於文化價值觀念之內容分析:以蒙古電視廣告為例
4. Purchase Intention of Counterfeit Products: A Case from Indonesia
5. Standalone versus Mixed Product Display and its Effect on Green Purchase Intention: The Mediating Effect of Green Product Efficacy
6. Linkage Hedonic and Utilitarian Value Toward Green Purchase Intention Moderated by Regulatory Focus and Temporal Distance Message Framing
7. 對新冠肺炎的懼怕及恐慌性消費:跨文化調節效應的檢驗
8. Third-Party Product Review and Impulsive Buying Behavior: A Study of Product Review Video on Video-Sharing Platform
9. The Role of Online Food Delivery In The Restaurant Industry: The Moderating Effect Of Consumer Styles
10. The Drivers of Social Media Addiction and Its Effect on Conspicuous Consumption
11. Antecedents of Group Travel Behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic
12. The Impact of Ad-Evoked Personal Nostalgia on Mongolian Consumers' Emotional Brand Attachment, Product and Advertisement Attitude, and Purchase Intetion
13. The Role of Social Media Marketing in Shaping Attitude and Enrollment Intention in an Online University among Students and Working Professionals
14. The Impact of Sustainable Packaging on Consumer Satisfaction with Products, Package Quality, and Purchase Intention among Mongolian Consumers
15. The Influence of AI-Powered Labels on Consumer Decision-Making: A Study of Moderation and Mediation Models
 
* *