帳號:guest(18.221.96.100)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:Md Mehtab Khalil
作者(英文):Md Mehtab Khalil
論文名稱:Why Chinese Firms Engage in Corporate Social Performance? Perspective from Stakeholder and RBV Theory
論文名稱(英文):Why Chinese Firms Engage in Corporate Social Performance? Perspective from Stakeholder and RBV Theory
指導教授:彭玉樹
指導教授(英文):Yu-Shu Peng
口試委員:欒錦榮
官志亮
口試委員(英文):Chin-jung Joseph Luan
Jyh-Liang Guan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學號:610533019
出版年(民國):108
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:49
關鍵詞(英文):Corporate Social PerformChinastakeholder thoeryresource based view
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:8
  • 收藏收藏:0
Purpose – Based on the stakeholder and resource based view theory, this study aims to
investigate why Chinese firms engage in corporate social performance (CSP).
Design/methodology/approach – This study uses company data from companies listed in
Shanghai stock exchange, which was collected by Taiwan economic journal (TEJ) from year
2013 to 2017.
Findings – This study found a negative relationship between degree of internationalization (DOI)
and CSP. Intangible resources were found to have negative relationship with CSP as proposed.
Relationship between leverage and CSP was negative instead of proposed positive effct and
relationship between ownership structure and CSP was found to be insignificant.
Originality/value – The research provides a better theoretical understanding of stakeholder and
RBV in respect to CSP and its antecedents. Some of the findings diverge from the extant
literature, providing important insight why Chinese companies engage in CSP.
Keywords: Corporate Social Performance; China; Leverage; stakeholder theory; resource-based
view
Abbreviations
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
CSP Corporate Social Performance
GDB Gender Diverse Board
TMT Top Management Team
RBV Resource Based View
Table of Contents
Title page i
Certificate of approval ii
Table of contents iii
List of figures iv
List of tables v
Abstract vi
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research background 1
1.2 Research gap and purpose of study 4
1.3 Significance of study 6
Chapter 2 Literature review and hypotheses development 7
2.1 Introduction 7
2.2 Stakeholder theory 7
2.3 Resource based view 8
2.4 Degree of internationalization 13
2.5 Intangible resources 14
2.6 Leverage 15
2.7 Firm ownership structure 16
Chapter 3 Methodology 20
3.1 Data and sample 20
3.2 Measure 20
Chapter 4 Result 27
4.1 Data analysis and descriptive statistics 27
4.2 Hypotheses testing 28
Chapter 5 Discussion 31
5.1 Discussion and conclusion 31
5.2 Implications 32
5.3 Limitations and future research 33
Notes 34
References 35
Akisik, O., & Gal, G. (2017). The impact of corporate social responsibility and internal controls
on stakeholders' view of the firm and financial performance. Sustainability Accounting,
Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 246-280.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,
17(1), 99–120.
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of
the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management
Journal, 33(11), 1304.
Becker R., & Henderson, V. (2000). Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries.
Journal of Political Economy, 108(2), 379–421.
Bernard, Y., Godard, L., & Zouaoui, M. (2018). The effect of CEOs’ turnover on the corporate
sustainability performance of French firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1049-
1069.
Bhattacharya, C, B., & Korschun, D. (2008). Stakeholder marketing: Beyond the four P’s and the
customer. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 27(1), 113–116.
Bonardi J, P., Holburn G, L, F., & Bergh, R, G, V. (2006) Nonmarket strategy performance:
Evidence from U.S. electric utilities. Academy of Management Journal. 49(6),1209–1228.
Brahim, H, B., & Arab, M, B. (2011). The effect of intangible resources on the economic
performance if the firm. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 3(1), 36-59.
Brammer, S. and Millington, A. 2003. ‘The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational
43
Structure and industry type on corporate community involvement’. Journal of Business
Ethics, 45(3), 213–226.
Brammer, S., and Millington, A. (2004), ‘The development of corporate charitable contributions
in the UK : a stakeholder analysis’. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1411–1434.
Campbell, J, L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An
institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review,
32(3), 946–967.
Chapple, W., and Moon, J. (2005), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility (CSP) in Asia: A Seven-
Country Study of CSP Web Site Reporting’, Business & Society 44(4), 415–441
Chen, S., & Tan, H. (2012). Region effects in the internationalization-performance relationship
in chinese firms. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 73.
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm
self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 438–458.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality
in the global arena. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1801-1825.
Contractor, F. J., Kundu, S. K., & Hsu, C. C. (2003). A three-stage theory of international
expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector.
Journal of Internation Business Studies, 34(1), 5-18
Darnall, N., Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P. 2010. ‘Adopting proactive environmental strategy:
the influence of stakeholders and firm size’. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094.
Deephouse, D. L. (2000) ‘Media reputation as a strategic resource: an integration of mass
communication and resource-based theories’, Journal of Management, 26(6): 1091–1112.
44
DiMaggio, P, J., & Powell, W.W (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and
Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 48(2):
147-160
Evan, W., & Freeman, R, E. (1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian
capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (4th ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Elijido-Ten, E., Kloot, L. and Clarkson, P. 2010. ‘Extending the application of stakeholder
influence strategies to environmental disclosures’. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 23(8), 1032–1059.
Ferrell, O. C., Gonzalez-Padron, T. L., Hult, G. T. M., & Maignan, I. (2010). From market
orientation to stakeholder orientation. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 29(1), 93–
96.
Fombrun, C. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business
School Press, Boston, MA.
Freeman, R. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective, Pitman, Boston, MA.
Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of
theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 258-285.
Gallego-Álvarez, I., Prado-Lorenzo, J., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., & García-Sánchez, I. (2010).
Are social and environmental practices a marketing tool? Management Decision, 48(10),
1440-1455.
Graves, S, B., & Waddock, S, A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social
performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034.
45
Guthrie, D. (2009) China and Globalization: The Social, Economic and Political Transformation
of Chinese Society, revised ed. (Routledge, New York).
Hart, S.L. 1995. ‘A natural resource-based view of the firm’. Academy of Management Review,
20(4), 986–1014.
He, Y., & Tian, Z. (2008). Government-oriented corporate public relation strategies in
transitional China. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 367-391.
Hillman, A, J., Keim, G, D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and
research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857.
Hillman AJ, Zardkoohi A, Bierman L (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm
performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S.
government. Strategic
Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Kim H Lord MD (2000). Corporate political strategy and legislative
decision-making: The impact of corporate legislative influence activities. Bus. Soc.
39(1):76–93.
Julian, S. D., & Ofori-dankwa, J. (2013). Financial resource availability and corporate social
responsibility expenditures in a sub-saharan economy: The institutional difference
hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1314.
Kang, J. (2013). The relationship between corporate diversification and corporate social
performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(1): 94–109.
Lamberti, L. and Lettieri, E. (2009). CSR practices and corporate strategy: evidence from a
longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 153-168.
Laplume, A. O., Sonar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that
moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.
46
Levine, M.A (2008) China’s CSP expectations mature, China Business Review, November-
December: 50-53
Li H, Meng L, Wang Q, Zhou LA (2008) Political connections, financing and firm performance:
Evidence from Chinese private firms. J. Development Econom. 87(2):283–299.
Li, J., & Qian, G. (2005). Dimensions of international diversification: Their joint effects on firm
performance. Journal of Global Marketing, 18(3/4): 7–35.
Li, W., & Zhang, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political
interference: Evidence from china. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 631-645.
Madden, T.J., Roth, M.S. and Dillon, W.R. (2012), “Global product quality and corporate social
Management Journal. 20(1):67–81.
Marano, V., Tashman, P., & Kostova, T. (2017). Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and
CSP reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International
Business Studies, 48(3), 386-408.
Marano, V., Tashman, P., & Kostova, T. (2017). Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and
CSP reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International
Business Studies, 48(3), 386-408.
Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in china: Symbol or
substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127-148.
Marquis, C., Glynn, M.A. and Davis, G.G. (2007), ‘‘Community isomorphism and corporate
social action’’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 925-45.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance:
Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
47
McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D.S. 2011. Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social
responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of
Management, 37(5),1480-1495.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and
ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363.
Misani, N. (2010). The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices. Management
Research Review, 33(7), 734-748.
Misani, N. (2010). The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices. Management
Research Review, 33(7), 734-748.
Moir, L. and Taffler, R.J. 2004. Does corporate philanthropy exist? Business giving to the arts in
the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 149-161.
Moon, Jeremy, and Xi Shen (2010), CSP in China Research: Salience, Focus and Nature, in:
Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 613–629.
Naughton B (2007) The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth (MIT Press, Cambridge,
MA).
Neu, D., Warsame, H. and Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: environmental
disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265-282.
Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B.B. and Murphy, P.E. (2013), “CSP practices and consumer
perceptions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66 No. 10, pp. 1839-1851.
Peng MW, Luo Y (2000) Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The
nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3):486–501..
48
Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance,
Free Press, New York, NY.
Porter, M.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, 1st ed., Free Press, New York, NY.
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder
management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
responsibility perceptions: a cross-national study of halo effects”, Journal of International
Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 42-57.
Roberts, R.W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application
of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595-612.
Roberts, P.W. (1999), “Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent
profitability in the US pharmaceutical industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20
No. 7, pp. 655-670.
Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical
investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and
financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32,
143–156.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental
performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.
Schuler DA, Rehbein K (1997) The filtering role of the firm in corporate political involvement.
Bus. Soc. 36(2):116–139.
Schuler DA, Rehbein K, Cramer RD (2002) Pursuing strategic advantage through political
means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4):659–672.
49
Seymour, James (2005), China’s Environment: A Bibliographic Essay, in: Kristen Day (ed.),
China’s Environment and the Challenge of Sustainable Development, Armonk and
London: M. E. Sharpe, 248–274.
Smith, C. N., Drumwright, M. E., & Gentile, M. C. (2010). The new marketing myopia. Journal
of Public Policy and Marketing, 29(1), 4–11.
Smith, K.T. and Brower, T.R. (2012), “Longitudinal study of green marketing strategies that
influence millennials”, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 565-551.
Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of
Management Review, 20(3): 571–610.
Surroca, J., Tribo, J.A. and Zahra, S.A. (2013). Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer
of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal,
56(2), 549-572.
Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility
and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business
Studies, 37(6): 850–862.
Tan-Mullins, M., & Hofman, P. S. (2014). The shaping of Chinese corporate social
responsibility. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 43(4), 3-18.
Tang, P., Yang, S., & Boehe, D. (2018). Ownership and corporate social performance in China:
Why geographic remoteness matters. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 1284-1295.
Villalonga, B. (2004). Intangible resources, Tobin’sq, and sustainability of performance
differences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(2), 205-230.
Waddock, S. (2008), ‘‘Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility’’,
Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 87-108.
50
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.
5, pp. 171-80.
Xu, E., Yang, H., Quan, J. M., & Lu, Y. (2015). Organizational slack and corporate social
performance: Empirical evidence from china's public firms. Asia Pacific Journal of
Management, 32(1), 181-198.
Zadek, S., Forstater M., Yu, K. (2012) Corporate Responsibility and Sustainable Economic
Development in China: Implications for Business, US Chamber of Commerce
Zadek, S, Chen X, Li, Z, Jia, T, Li ,G, Zhou, Y, Kelly Yu, Maya, F, and Guy, M (2009),
Responsible Business in Africa: Chinese Business Leaders’ Perspectives on Performance
and Enhancement Opportunities, Corporate Social Responsibility
Zadek, Simon, Kelly Yu, and Maya Forstater (2012), Corporate Responsibility in China,
Washington, DC: US Chamber of Commerce, National Chamber Foundation and Asia
Department.
Zheng, X. (2005) The New Policy Initatives in China’s 11th 5-Year Plan, China Policy Institute
Briefing Series Issues 1 , Nottingham University
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *