帳號:guest(18.118.254.141)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:焦品瑄
作者(英文):Pin-Hsuan Chiao
論文名稱:審計公費與非審計公費對避稅行為之影響
論文名稱(英文):The Effects of Audit Fees and Non-Audit Fees on Tax Avoidance
指導教授:黃德芬
指導教授(英文):De-Fen Huang
口試委員:王肇蘭
簡雪芳
口試委員(英文):Chao-Lan Wang
Hsueh-Fang Chien
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:會計與財務碩士學位學程
學號:610538021
出版年(民國):107
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:58
關鍵詞:審計公費非審計公費避稅行為有效稅率現金有效稅率
關鍵詞(英文):audit feesnon-audit feestax avoidanceeffective tax ratecash effective tax rate
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
近年來反避稅浪潮持續延燒,在企業與政府之間,會計師的角色尤其重要。本研究主要探討審計公費與非審計公費金額多寡對企業避稅行為之影響,文中以2006至2016年台灣上市上櫃公司為樣本,參考Chen et al. (2010)之研究模型,採用有效稅率及現金有效稅率作為避稅行為的衡量指標,實證結果發現當會計師收取較高的審計公費時,將投入足夠的資源進行查核簽證,增加財務與稅務簽證品質,進而抑制企業之避稅行為。另外,企業額外購買非審計服務時,會計師會提供稅務相關服務,協助企業進行租稅規劃。最後,本研究進行三項敏感性測試以加強本研究之穩健性。
Recently, the rise of anti-tax avoidance continued to spread to the world. The role of auditors becomes more important between company and government. The research mainly discusses about how the amount of audit fees and non-audit fees will affect tax avoidance of company. This research uses TSE (Taiwan Stock Exchange) and OTC (Over-the-counter) listed firms in Taiwan from 2006 to 2016 as the sample, following the model developed by Chen et al. (2010), and adopting effective tax rate and cash effective tax rate as proxies for tax avoidance. The study finds out that if auditors charge higher audit fees, they will make more effort and put more resources in auditing and tax attestation processes, which can restrain tax avoidance of the company. Besides, the auditors provide incremental tax services to assist company tax planning if company additionally purchases non-audit services. The empirical results still remains robust based on the sensitivity tests.
摘要 I
Abstract II
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧及假說發展 5
第一節 審計公費與非審計公費 5
第二節 避稅行為 10
第三節 審計公費、非審計公費與避稅行為之關聯 14
第三章 研究設計 17
第一節 實證模型 17
第二節 變數說明 19
第三節 資料來源與樣本選取 24
第四章 實證結果與分析 25
第一節 敘述性統計 25
第二節 相關係數分析 31
第三節 實證結果 36
第四節 敏感性分析 40
第五章 研究結論與未來建議 47
第一節 研究結論 47
第二節 研究限制及建議 48
參考文獻
一、中文文獻 49
二、英文文獻 50
一、中文文獻
李建然、廖秀梅與黃雨頎,2010,審計與非審計服務之知識外溢效果,中華管理評論國際學報。
林嬌能,2007,帳面-課稅所得差異與盈餘管理之相關性,成功大學會計學系學位論文,1-106。
林嬌能、許彩蓮,2011,家族企業與租稅規劃之關聯性,會計學報,第4卷,第1期,23-49。
林靖傑,2013,營利事業規避最低稅負之行為以及會計師稅務簽證功能之探討,當代會計,14(1),87-112。
梁嘉復,2017,關係人交易與避稅行為之關聯性- 中國大陸上市公司之實證研究,國立東華大學會計與財務碩士學位學程未出版之碩士論文。
陳明進,2003,我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響,管理評論,第22 卷,第1 期,127-151。
陳明進,2006,稽徵機關稅務查核對營利事業短漏報所得之影響,經濟論文,34(2),213-250。
陳明進,2009,財務報表資料推估課稅所得之研究,管理學報,第26卷,第6期,625-636。
陳明進與蔡麗雯,2006,財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究,管理學報,第23 卷,第6 期,739-763。
黃美祝,2010,財稅差異金額大小對國稅局選案查核之影響,會計評論,第50期,23-55。
黃美祝與林世銘,2009,國稅局選案查核與企業租稅逃漏之探討,會計評論,第48期,35-66。
黃美祝與楊佩璇,2011,集團企業與非集團企業避稅程度之比較,會計學報,第4 卷,第1 期,1-22。
黃德芬與陳瑋杰,2016,移轉訂價與避稅行為及租稅負擔之關聯,財稅研究,第45卷,第2期,20-46。
蔡佳芬,2015,公司治理與避稅行為之關聯性,國立東華大學會計與財務碩士學 位學程未出版之碩士論文。
蔡慧玲,1998,企業對會計師事務所非審計服務需求之硏究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
張仲岳與曹美娟,2005,台灣上市公司審計公費決定因素,當代會計,第6卷, 第2期,125-152。
張敏蕾、黃德芬,2007,遞延所得稅費用策略性調控與公司盈餘管理行為,當代 會計,第8卷,第2期,181-208。
廖秀梅、王貞靜與戚務君,2012,一套臺灣完整的審計公費資訊告訴我們什麼? 中華會計學刊,第8卷,第1期,49-88。

二、英文文獻
Ayers, B. C., Laplante, S. K., & McGuire, S. T. (2010). Credit ratings and taxes: The effect of book–tax differences on ratings changes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(2), 359-402.
Bedard, J. C., & Johnstone, K. M. (2004). Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors' planning and pricing decisions. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 277-304.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61.
Craswell, A. T., & Francis, J. R. (1999). Pricing initial audit engagements: A test of competing theories. The Accounting Review, 74(2), 201-216.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence,‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113-127.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. (2002). Do non–audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247-1274.
Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179.
Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. The review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537-546.
Donohoe, M., & Knechel, R. (2009). Muddying the water: The impact of corporate tax avoidance on auditor remuneration: working paper, University of Florida.
Donohoe, M. P., & Robert Knechel, W. (2014). Does corporate tax aggressiveness influence audit pricing? Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1), 284-308.
Dopuch, N., King, R. R., & Schwartz, R. (2003). Independence in appearance and in fact: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(1), 79-114.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82.
Firth, M. (2002). Auditor–provided consultancy services and their associations with audit fees and audit opinions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(5‐6), 661-693.
Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295-327.
Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British accounting review, 36(4), 345-368.
Francis, J. R. (2006). Are auditors compromised by nonaudit services? Assessing the evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(3), 747-760.
Francis, J. R., Reichelt, K., & Wang, D. (2005). The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the US audit market. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 113-136.
Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467-496.
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors' fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 71-105.
Ghosh, A. A., Kallapur, S., & Moon, D. (2009). Audit and non-audit fees and capital market perceptions of auditor independence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(5), 369-385.
Hanlon, M. (2005). The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 137-166.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178.
Hanlon, M., Krishnan, G. V., & Mills, L. F. (2012). Audit fees and book-tax differences. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 34(1), 55-86.
Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A Meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141-191.
Heltzer, W., & Shelton, S. W. (2011). The book–tax divide: Perceptions from the field. Research in Accounting Regulation, 23(2), 130-137.
Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2025-2059.
Huang, D.-F., & Chang, M.-L. (2016). Do auditor-provided tax services improve the relation between tax-related internal control and book-tax differences? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 23(2), 177-199.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Khurana, I., & Moser, W. (2009). Institutional ownership and tax aggressiveness.
King, M. A., & Fullerton, D. (1984). The taxation of income from capital: A comparative study of the united states, the united kingdom, sweden, and germany. NBER Books.
Knechel, W. R., & Payne, J. L. (2001). Additional evidence on audit report lag. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 137-146.
Knechel, W. R., & Sharma, D. S. (2012). Auditor-provided nonaudit services and audit effectiveness and efficiency: Evidence from pre-and post-SOX audit report lags. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 85-114.
Knechel, W. R., Sharma, D. S., & Sharma, V. D. (2012). Non‐audit services and knowledge spillovers: Evidence from New Zealand. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(1‐2), 60-81.
Knechel, W. R., Sharma, D. S., & Sharma, V. D. (2012). Non‐audit services and knowledge spillovers: Evidence from New Zealand. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(1‐2), 60-81.
Lennox, C. S. (1999). Audit quality and auditor size: An evaluation of reputation and deep pockets hypotheses. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(7‐8), 779-805.
Lin, S. (2000). CPA attested tax returns and tax evasion. Taiwan Accounting Review 1:15-36.
Lisowsky, P., Robinson, L., & Schmidt, A. (2013). Do publicly disclosed tax reserves tell us about privately disclosed tax shelter activity? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3), 583-629.
Markelevich, A., & Rosner, R. L. (2013). Auditor fees and fraud firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1590-1625.
Mills, L., Newberry, K., & Trautman, W. (2002). Trends in book-tax income and balance sheet differences. Journal of the American Taxation Association 23 (1):1-19.
Mills, L. F., & Newberry, K. J. (2001). The influence of tax and nontax costs on book-tax reporting differences: Public and private firms. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 23(1), 1-19.
Mitra, S., Deis, D. R., & Hossain, M. (2009). The association between audit fees and reported earnings quality in pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley regimes. Review of Accounting and Finance, 8(3), 232-252.
Palmrose, Z.-V. (1988). 1987 Competitive Manuscript Co-Winner: An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting review, 55-73.
Phillips, J., Pincus, M., & Rego, S. O. (2003). Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review, 78(2), 491-521.
Porcano, T. (1986). Corporate tax rates: Progressive, proportional, or regressive. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 7(2), 17-31.
Raghunandan, K., Read, W. J., & Whisenant, J. S. (2003). Initial evidence on the association between nonaudit fees and restated financial statements. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 223-234.
Rego, S. O. (2003). Tax‐avoidance activities of US multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 805-833.
Richardson, G., & Lanis, R. (2007). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 689-704.
Schmidt, J. J. (2012). Perceived auditor independence and audit litigation: The role of nonaudit services fees. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 1033-1065.
Seetharaman, A., Gul, F. A., & Lynn, S. G. (2002). Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of accounting and economics, 33(1), 91-115.
Seida, J. A., & Wempe, W. F. (2004). Effective tax rate changes and earnings stripping following corporate inversion. National Tax Journal, 805-828.
Shevlin, T., & Porter, S. (1992). " The Corporate Tax Comeback in 1987" Some Further Evidence. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 14(1), 58.
Siegfried, J. J. (1974). Effective average US corporation income tax rates. National Tax Journal, 245-259.
Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 161-190.
Simunic, D. A. (1984). Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 679-702.
Stickney, C. P., & McGee, V. E. (1982). Effective corporate tax rates the effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1(2), 125-152.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(3), 613-633.
Weisbach, D. A. (2002). An Economic Analysis of Anti‐Tax‐Avoidance Doctrines. American Law and Economics Review, 4(1), 88-115.
Wilkie, P. J., & Limberg, S. (1990). The relationship between firm size and effective tax rate: A reconciliation of Zimmerman (1983) and Porcano (1986). Journal of the American Taxation Association, 11(1), 76-91.
(此全文限內部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *