|
1. Rodriguez-Alvarez L., Velasquez A.E. Pursuit of Markers to Assess and Select Competence of in vitro-Produced Embryos. In Vitro Fertilization 2(2), 1018 (2015). 2. Scott L. A. & Samuel S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum. Reprod. 13(4), 1003 1013 (1998). 3. Van Royen E., Mangelschots K., De Neubourg D., Valkenburg M., Van de Meerssch, M., Ryckaert G., Eestermans W., Gerris J. Characterization of a top-quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 14(9), 2345 2349 (1999). 4. Gerris J., De Neubourg D., Mangelschots K., Van Royen E., Van de Meerssche M., Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria (a prospective randomized clinical trial). Hum. Reprod. 14, 2581 2587 (1999). 5. Gardner D. K., Lane M., Stevens J., Schlenker T., Schoolcraft W. B. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil. Steril. 73(6), 1155 1158 (2000). 6. Cummins J. M., Breen T.M., Harrison K.L., Shaw J.M., Wilson L.M., Hennessey J.F. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison, with visual estimates of embryo quality. J. In Vitro Fertil. Em. 3(5), 284 295 (1986). 7. Taiwanese Society for Reproductive Medicine Retrieved from http://www.tsrm.org.tw/tsrm-tft/en/works/ 8. Ferraro J.R., Nakamoto K. and Brown C.W. (2003). Introductory Raman Spectroscopy. Academic Press An imprint of Elsevier Science 9. Heraud P., Marzec K. M., Zhang Q., Yuen W. S., Carroll J., & Wood, B. R. Label-free in vivo Raman microspectroscopic imaging of the macromolecular architecture of oocytes. Scientific Reports, 7(1) (2017). 10. Ishigaki M., Hashimoto K., Sato H., Ozaki Y. Non-destructive monitoring of mouse embryo development and its qualitative evaluation at the molecular level using Raman spectroscopy. Scientific Reports 7: 43942 (2017). 11. Perevedentseva E., Krivokharchenko A., Karmenyan A. V., Chang, H.-H., & Cheng, C.-L. Raman spectroscopy on live mouse early embryo while it continues to develop into blastocyst in vitro. Scientific Reports, 9(1) (2019). 12. Reece Jane B., et al. Campbell Biology. Tenth edition. Boston: Pearson, 2014. 34 13. Brown G.C., Borutaite V. Regulation of apoptosis by the redox state of cytochrome c. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Bioenergetics 1777, 877-881 (2008). 14. Li K., Li Y., Shelton J.M., Richardson J.A., Spencer E., Chen Z.J., Wang X., Williams R.S. Cytochrome c Deficiency Causes Embryonic Lethality and Attenuates Stress-Induced Apoptosis. Cell 101, 389-399 (2000). 15. Li P.W., Kuo T.H., Chang J.H., Yeh J.M., Chan W.H. Induction of cytotoxicity and apoptosis in mouse blastocysts by silver nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett 197, 82–87 (2010). 16. De S.K., Paria B.C., Dey S.K., Andrews G.K. Stage-specific effects of cadmium on preimplantation embryo development and implantation in the mouse. Toxicology 80, 13–25 (1993). 17. Yamashita K., Yoshioka Y., Higashiosaka Mimura K., Morishita Y., Nozaki M., Yoshida T., Ogura T., Nabeshi H., Nagano K., Abe Y., Kamada H., Monobe Y., Imazawa T., Aoshima H., Shishid, K., Kawai Y., Mayumi T., Tsunoda S., Itoh N., Yoshikawa, T., Yanagihara I., Saito S., Tsutsumi Y. Silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles cause pregnancy complications in mice. Nat Nanotechnol 6, 321–328 (2011). 18. Takeda K., Suzuki K.I., Ishihara A., Kubo-Irie M., Fujimoto R., Tabata M., Oshio S., Nihei Y., Ihara T., Sugamata M. Nanoparticles transferred from pregnant mice to their offspring can damage the genital and cranial nerve systems. J Health Sci, 55, 95–102 (2009). 19. Shimizu M., Tainaka H., Oba T., Mizuo K., Umezawa M., Takeda K. Maternal exposure to nanoparticulate titanium dioxide during the prenatal period alters gene expression related to brain development in the mouse. Part Fibre Toxicol 6, 20–28 (2009). 20. Cela P., Vesela B., Matalova E., Vecera Z., Buchtova M. Embryonic Toxicity of Nanoparticles. Cells Tissues Organs, 199, 1-23 (2014). 21. Rogers N.J., Franklin N.M., Apte S.C., Batley G.E. The importance of physical and chemical characterization in nanoparticle toxicity studies. Integr Environ Assess Manag., 3, 303–304 (2007). 22. Chu, M., Wu Q., Yang H., Yuan R., Hou S., Yang Y., Zou Y., Xu S., Xu K., Ji A., Sheng L. Transfer of quantum dots from pregnant mice to pups across the placental barrier. Small 6, 670–678 (2010). 23. Williams O. RSC Nanoscience & Nanotechnology No. 31: Nanodiamond The Royal Society of Chemistry (2014). 35 24. Krueger A. Carbon Materials and Nanotechnology. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA (2010). 25. Schrand A.M., Suzanne A., Hens C., Shenderova O.A. Nanodiamond Particles: Properties and Perspectives for Bioapplications, Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, 34:1-2, 18-74 (2009). 26. Shenderova O.A., Zhirnov V.V., Brenner D.W. Carbon nanostructures, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater.Sci., 27, 227 (2002). 27. Krueger A., Lang D. Functionality is Key: Recent Progress in the Surface Modification of Nanodiamond. Advanced Functional Materials, 22: 890–906 (2012). 28. Luo C., Zuniga J., Edison E., Palla S., Dong W., Parker-Thornburg J. Superovulation Strategies for 6 Commonly Used Mouse Strains. Journal of the Americal Association for Laboratory Animal Science 50(4) (2011). 29. Rugh, R. The mouse. Its reproduction and development. Burgess Pub. Co., 225-235 (1968). 30. Krivokharchenko A., Karmenyan A., Sarkisov O., Bader M., Chiou A., Shakhbazyan A., Laser fusion of mouse embryonic cells and intra-embryonic fusion of blastomeres without affecting the embryo integrity. PLoS One, 7(12): e50029 (2012). 31. Campagnolo L., Massimiani M., Palmieri G., Bernardini R., Sacchetti C., Bergamaschi A., Vecchione L., Magrini A., Bottini M., Pietroiusti A. Biodistribution and toxicity of pegylated single wall carbon nanotubes in pregnant mice. Part Fibre Toxicol, 10:21 (2013). 32. Ema M., Kobayashi N., Naya M., Hanai S., Nakanishi J., Reproductive and developmental toxicity studies of manufactured nanomaterials. Reprod Toxicol, 30(3):343-52 (2010). 33. Semmler-Behnke M., Fertsch S., Schmid G., Wenk A., Kreyling W.G. Uptake of 1.4nm versus 18 nm gold nanoparticles in secondary target organs is size dependent in control and pregnant rats after intratracheal or intravenous application. In:Proceedings of Euro Nano Forum (2007). 34. Assou S., Boumela I., Haouzi D., Anahory T., Dechaud H., De Vos J., Hamamah S. Dynamic changes in gene expression during human early embryo development: From fundamental aspects to clinical applications. Human reproduction update 17. 272-90. 10.1093/humupd/dmq036 (2010). 35. Perevedentseva E., Peer D., Uvarov V., Zousman B., Levinson O. Nanodiamonds of Laser Synthesis for Biomedical Applications. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 15: 1045-1052 (2014). 36 36. Khan Z., Morbeck D.E., Walker D.L., Fredrickson J.R., Stewart E.A., Coddington C.C. Mouse embryos and in vitro stress: does mouse strain matter? Fertility and Sterility, 94(4) (2010). 37. Herrick J.R., Paik T., Strauss K.J., Schoolcraft W.B., Krisher R.L. Building a better mouse embryo assay: effects of mouse strain and in vitro maturation on sensitivity to contaminants of the culture environment. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(2): 237-245 (2016). 38. Whitten W.K., Biggers J.D. Complete development in vitro of the pre-implantation stages of the mouse in a simple chemically defined medium. J Reprod Fertil. 17:399–401 (1968). 39. Suzuki O., Asano T., Yamamoto Y., Takano K., Koura M. Development in vitro of preimplantation embryos from 55 mouse strains. Reprod Fertil Dev. 8:975–80 (1996). 40. Chatot C.L., Lewis J.L., Torres I, Ziomek C.A. Development of 1-cell embryos from different strains of mice in CZB medium. Biol Reprod. 42:432–40 (1990). 41. Khan Z., Wolff H.S., Fredrickson J.R., Walker D.L., Daftary G.S., Morbeck D.E. Mouse strain and quality control testing: improved sensitivity of the mouse embryo assay with embryos from outbred mice. Fertil Steril. 99:847–54 (2013). 42. Hadi T., Hammer M.A., Algire C., Richards T., Baltz J.M. Similar effects of osmolarity, glucose, and phosphate on cleavage past the 2-cell stage in mouse embryos from outbred and F1 hybrid females. Biol Reprod. 72:179–87 (2005). 43. Hopper A.P., Dugan J.M., Gill A.A., Fox O.J.L., May P.W., Haycock J.W. and Claeyssens F. Amine functionalized nanodiamond promotes cellular adhesion, proliferation and neurite outgrowth. Biomedical Materials, 9(4) (2014). 44. Hardy K., Hooper M.A., Handyside A.H., Rutherford A.J., Winston R.M., Leese, H.J. Non-invasive measurement of glucose and pyruvate uptake by individual human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Human Reproduction 4(2): 188-91 (1989). 45. Chen JY., Schopf J.W., Bottjer D.J., Zhang C.-Y., Kudryavtsev A.B., Tripathi A.B., Wang X.Q., Yang Y.H., Gao, X., Yang Y. Raman spectra of a Lower Cambrian ctenophore embryo from southwestern Shaanxi, China. PNAS 104(15) (2007). 46. Bradley J., Pope I., Masia F., Sanusi R., Langbein W., Swann K., Borri P. Quantitative imaging of lipids in live mouse oocytes and early embryos using CARS microscopy. Development 143(12): 2238-47 (2016). 37 47. Okotrub K.A., Mokrousova V.I., Amstislavsky S.Y., Surovtsev N.V. Lipid Droplet Phase Transition in Freezing Cay Embryos and Oocytes Probed by Raman Spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 115(3): 577-587 (2018). 48. Van Blerkom J., Davis P., Mathwig V., Alexander S. Domains of high-polarized and low-polarized mitochondria may occur in mouse and human oocytes and early embryos. Hum Reprod 17:393–406 (2002). 49. Piccoli, C., Perna G., Scrima R., Cela O., Rinaldi R., Boffoli D., Capozzi V., Capitanio N. A Novel Redox State Heme a Marker in Cytochrome c Oxidase Revealed by Raman Spectroscopy. Physica Scripta. 2005. 199. 10.1238/Physica.Topical.118a00199 (2005). 50. Cotton T.M., Schultz S.G., Van Duyne R.P. Cytochrome c and Myoglobin Adsorbed on a Silver Electrode Journal of the American Chemical Society, 102(27), 7960-7962 (1980). 51. Shelnutt J.A., Rousseau D.L., Dethmers J.K., Margoliash E. Protein Influences on Porphyrin Structure in Cytochrome c: Evidences from Raman Difference Spectroscopy Biochemistry, 20, 6485-6497 (1981). 52. Onogi C., Hamaguchi H. In Vivo Resonance Raman Detection of Ferrous Cytochrome c from Mitochondria of Single Living Yeast Cells Chem. Lett. 39, 270-271 (2010). 53. Chertkova R.V., Brazhe N.A., Bryantseva T.V., Nekrasov A.N., Dolgikh D.A., Yusipovich A.I. New insight into the mechanism of mitochondrial cytochrome c function. PLoS ONE 12(5): e0178280 (2017). 54. Kakita M., Okuno M., Hamaguchi H. Quantitative analysis of the redox states of cytochromes in a living L929(NCTC) cell by resonance Raman microspectroscopy J. of Biophotonics 1-4 (2012). 55. Okada M., Smith N.I., Palonpon A.F., Endo H., Kawata S., Sodeoka M., Fujita K. Label-free Raman observation of cytochrome c dynamics during apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 109, 28–32 (2012). |