帳號:guest(18.223.171.51)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:王佑婷
作者(英文):Yu-Ting Wang
論文名稱:法源體系、IASB 委員國及監管經驗對會計品質之影響:來自強制採用IFRS國家之證據
論文名稱(英文):The effect of legal origins, IASB members’ country experiences of national regulatory authority and accounting quality: Evidence from mandatory use of IFRS countries
指導教授:姚維仁
指導教授(英文):Wei-Ren Yao
口試委員:李佳玲
林穎芬
口試委員(英文):Jia-Ling Li
Ying-Fen Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:會計與財務碩士學位學程
學號:610638005
出版年(民國):108
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:38
關鍵詞:盈餘管理法源體系國際會計準則委員會會計品質
關鍵詞(英文):Earning ManagementLegal originsInternational Accounting Standards BoardAccounting quality
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:25
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究欲檢視於強制採用國際會計準則國家中,IASB委員之國籍來自不同法源體系時是否對會計品質有所影響,主要將法源分為兩大體系-普通法及大陸法,並針對財務報表之盈餘管理程度以評估會計品質之高低。首先,本研究探討在強制採用IFRS之公司中來自不同法系之IASB委員是否會影響會計品質的好壞。其次,檢驗強制採用IFRS之公司中IASB委員有準則制定機構或監管機構之經驗者是否會影響會計品質。
研究結果發現,在強制採用IFRS之公司中,公司所在國在IASB中有委員且該國源自普通法系時,其會計品質並未較源自大陸法系國家之公司佳。然而,當所在國源自普通法系之公司中有IASB委員且該委員有準則制定機構或監管機構之經驗者,其會計品質會較沒有經驗者佳。
The purpose of this study is to investigate that in mandatory use of IFRS countries, whether the IASB members whose nationality from different legal origins have an impact on accounting quality. We divide legal origins into two major systems - common law and code law and use earning management which one of accounting quality measures to determine the accounting quality.
First of all, we explore that in mandatory using IFRS companies, whether IASB members from different legal systems have an effect on accounting quality. Secondly, among the companies that mandatory use IFRS, whether IASB members who have experience in supervisory organizations have an influence on accounting quality.
We find that among the companies that mandatory use of IFRS, the accounting quality of the company which from the country originated from the common law system and has members in the IASB is not better than the one which from the country originated from the code law system. However, in the country originated in the common law, the accounting quality of the company which has members in the IASB and whom have experience in supervisory organizations is better than the one which has members in the IASB but whom haven’t experience in supervisory organizations.

壹、緒論 1
貳、文獻回顧及假說 5
一、會計品質 5
(1) 會計品質之定義 5
(2) 會計品質之衡量 6
二、法源體系8
三、國際會計準則委員會之特性 10
參、研究設計 13
一、模型設計 13
(1) 應計盈餘管理模型 13
(2) H1 實證模型 14
(3) H2 實證模型 15
二、資料來源與樣本選取 17
肆、實證結果 19
一、敘述性統計 19
二、實證模型之迴歸結果20
(1) 假說一之迴歸結果 20
(2) 假說二之迴歸結果 21
三、進一步測試之迴歸結果22
伍、結論 23
參考文獻 25
附錄一 28
附錄二 29
附錄三 30
Allen, A., and K. Ramanna. 2013. Towards an understanding of the role of
standard setters in standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics
55: 66–90.
Ashbaugh, H., and M. Pincus. 2001. Domestic Accounting Standards,International
Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings. Journal of
Accounting Research 39:417–434.
Ashbaugh, H. 2001. Non-US Firms' Accounting Standard Choices. Journal of
Accounting and Public Policy 20: 129–153.
Barth, M., W. Landsman, and M. Lang. 2008. International Accounting Standards
and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research 46: 467–498.
Bikki, J., and Y. L. Pek. 2000. Impact of Culture, Market Forces, and Legal System
on Financial Disclosures. The International Journal of Accounting 35: 495–
519.
Bertrand, M., and A. Schoar. 2003. Managing with style: the effect of managers
on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 1169–1208.

Bamber, L., J. Jiang, and I. Wang. 2010. What’s my style? The influence of top
managers on voluntary corporate financial disclosure. The Accounting
Review 85: 1131–1162.
Battacharya, U. 2007. Enforcement and its impact on cost of equity and liquidity
of the market. Task Force to Modernize Securities Legislation in Canada:
Research studies 6: 131–64.
Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:
1–44.
Chan, L. H. , K. C. Chen, T. – Y. Chen, and Y. Yu. 2012. The effects of firm-initiated
clawback provisions on earnings quality and auditor behavior. Journal of
Accounting and Economics 54: 180–196.
Dyreng, S., M. Hanlon, and E. Maydew. 2010. The effects of executives on
corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review 85: 1163–1189.

Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting Earnings
Management. The Accounting Review 70: 193–225.
DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor independence, 'low bailing', and disclosure regulation.
Journal of Accounting and Economics 3: 113–127.
Dopuch, N. and D. Simunic. 1982. Competition in Auditing : An Assessment.
Symposium on Auditing Research IV(University of Illinois): 401–450.
Djankov, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2008. The law and
economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics 88: 430–465.
Daske, H., L. Hail, C. Leuz, and R. Verdi. 2013. Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in
the Economic Consequences Around IAS/IFRS Adoptions. Journal of
Accounting Research 51: 495–547.
DeGeorge, E. T., C. B. Ferguson, and N.A. Spear. 2012 How much does IFRS
cost? IFRS adoption and audit fees. The Accounting Review88: 429–462.
Ewert, R., and A. Wagenhofer. 2005. Economic Effects of Tightening Accounting
Standards to Restrict Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 43: 1101
–1124.
Faccio, M., and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. The ultimate ownership of Western European
corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65: 365–395.
Evans, M. E., R. W. Houston, M. F. Peters, and J. H. Pratt. 2014. Reporting
Regulatory Environments and Earnings Management: US and Non-US Firms
Using US GAAP or IFRS. The Accounting Review 90: 1969–1994.
Grossman, S. J. 1981. The informational role of warranties and private disclosure
about product quality. Journal of Law and Economics 24: 461–483.
Healy, P. M., and J. Wahlen. 1999. A Review of the earnings management
literature and its implications for standard settings. Accounting Horizons 13:
365–383.
Healy, P. M. 1985. The Effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal
of Accounting and Economics 7: 85–107.
Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal
of Accounting Research 29: 193–228.
Kothari, S.P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched
discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39:
163-197.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. Law and
Finance. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113–1155.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2006. What works in securities
laws? The Journal of Finance 61: 1–32.
Larson, R. K. 2007. Constituent Participation and the IASB's International Financial
Reporting Interpretations Committee. Accounting in Europe 4: 207-254.
Li, S. 2010. Does mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards in the European Union reduce the cost of equity capital? The
Accounting Review 85: 607–636.
Morley, J. 2016. Internal lobbying at the IASB. Journal Accounting Public Policy
35: 224–255.
Paananen, M., and N. Parmar. 2008. The Adoption of IFRS in the UK. Working
paper.
Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1987. Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor
Choice in the Market for Unseasoned New Issues. The Canadian Certified
General Accountants Research Foundation.
Stigler, G. 1964. A Theory of Oligopoly. The Journal of Political Economy 72:
44–61.

Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the
determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53: 112–134.
Young, J. J. 2014. Separating the political and technical: Accounting standard-
setting and purification. Contemporary Accounting Research 31: 713–747.
Zeff, S. A. 2002. ‘‘Political” lobbying on proposed standards: A challenge to the
IASB. Accounting Horizons 16: 43–54.
Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons
3: 91–102.
Zweigert, K., and H. Kotz. 1988. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford
 University Press.
(此全文未開放授權)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *