This study investigated honorary teachers' personality traits and subjective well-being within four dependent variables: gender, age, duration of teaching, and education level. This study applied the quantitative method analysis where the data were from the mean, p, and r of the statistic survey's collections with 82 honorary teachers in Kualuh Leidong Sub District, Indonesia. The statistical analysis was Pearson product-moment correlation (PPMCC) were employed. In order to examine the personality and subjective well-being of independent sample One-Way ANOVA analysis, Linear Regression correlation analysis to analyze the correlation between the five dimensions, descriptive statistic method to obtain the sequence influence of the personality traits and subjective well-being.
The results showed that (1) the highest personality trait of honorary teachers was conscientiousness (M=4.01, SD=0.30) and the lowest personality was neuroticism (M=3.71, SD=0.43); (2) the highest subjective well-being variable was an achievement at work (M=3.78, SD=0.85), and the lowest was the satisfaction of material needs (M=3.49, SD=0.79); (3) correlation between personality traits and subjective well-being with (r= 0.424) ;(4) age (p=0.046) and education (p=0.044) have a significant relationship toward personality traits (neuroticism and agreeableness) whereas the duration of teaching and gender there was no significant correlation; (5) age, gender and duration teaching were not significant influence on subjective well-being; however, education (p=0.039)level were significant relationships toward subjective well-being (achievement at work). The result of an interview was that the honorary teacher felt happy as an honorary teacher and have some challenges during the covid-19 to teach students, such as internet connection, time to teach, and income.

Keywords: Personality traits, subjective well-being, honorary teachers, elementary public schools, Indonesia.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT i
ABSTRACT….. iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS v
LIST OF TABLES vii
LIST OF FIGURES ix
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and motivation of research 1
1.2 Purpose of the research 7
1.3 Research questions 7
1.4 The terminology 8
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 11
2.1 Definition of teacher in Indonesia. 11
2.1.1 Honorary teacher in Indonesia 11
2.1.2 The challenges of honorary teachers in Indonesia 12
2.2 The review of personality 14
2.2.1 Approaching personality traits theory 20
2.2.2 Personality trait five factors theory definition 25
2.3 The review of subjective well-being. 31
2.3.1 Components of subjective well-being 34
2.3.2 Predictors of subjective well-being 34
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 39
3.1 Research design 39
3.2 The participants 42
3.2.1. Populations 42
3.2.1. Research site 42
3.2.2. Participants 48
3.3 Tools of research 49
3.3.1 Background characteristics 50
3.3.2 Personality questionnaire 51
3.3.2.4 Subjective well-being 52
3.3.2.5 Interview guidance 55
3.4 Research procedures 55
3.5 Data collections and analysis 57
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 59
4.1 Descriptive statistics for personality traits degree 59
4.2 Descriptive statistics for subjective well-being degree. 65
4.3 The Relationship between personality and subjective well-being. 69
4.4 The difference between socio-demographic factors and personality traits 73
4.5 The differences between socio-demographic factors and subjective well-being 76
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 85
5.1 Conclusion of the study 85
5.2 Suggestions for the future study 88
REFERENCE 91
APPENDIX A English Questionnaire Version 103
English Questionnaire Version 103
APPENDIX B Kuesioner Versi Indonesia 111

English
Ahmad, I., Said, H., Zeb, A., Sihatullah., & Rehman, K. (2013). Effects of professional attitude of teachers on their teaching performance: Case of government secondary school teachers in Malakand Region, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Educational and Social Research,3(1), 25-31.
Aliga, M., & Gunderson, B. (2002). Interactive statistic. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Anjali, S & Mamata, M. (2020). Subjective well-being at workplace: A review on its implications. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 2394-5125.
Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.
Argyle, M. M., & Lu, L. (1995). The measurement of happiness. In S. Sarason & S.L. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and Emotion, (14), 101-117. New York: Sage.
Argyle, M. M., & Lu. L. (1990). The Happiness of extraverts. Personality and Individual Differences,11, 1011-1017.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C.K. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Mason, OH: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18(4), 359–372.
Barrick, M. R., Parks, L., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Self-monitoring as a moderator of the relationships between personality traits and performance. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 745-767.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43-51.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386
Bryson, A., Forth, J., & Stokes, L. (2017). Does employees' subjective well-being affect workplace performance? Human Relations, 70(8), 1017-1037.
Buchanan, T., Johnson, J. A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). Implementing a five-factor personality inventory for use on the internet. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 115–127.
Buela, S., & Joseph, M. (2015). Relationship between personality and teacher effectiveness of high school teachers. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(1), 57-70.
Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264.
Cameron, P. (1975). Mood as an indicate of happiness: Age, sex, social class, and situational differences. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 216-224.
Cameron, P., Titus, D. G., Kostin, J., & Kostin, M. (1973). The life satisfaction of non-normal persons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41(2), 207-214.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1996). Perspectives on personality (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Cattell, R. B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore, MD.: Penguin Books.
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, H. E. (1995). Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16pf. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(6), 926-937.
Chen, J. (2017). The study of personality traits and teacher efficacy of the gifted classes in the elementary school [Unpublished Thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University. Taipei. Taiwan.
Chiang., H-H., Lin, L., & Lee, T. (2015). Psychometric integrity of the Chinese Happiness Inventory among retired older people in Taiwan. Geriatrics & Gerontology International. 16. 10.1111/ggi.12568.
Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.
Costa P. T., & McCrae R. R. (1985). The neo personality inventory manual. Psychological assessment resources, Odessa. Fl: Psychological assessment resource.
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R, R., Zonderman, A, B., Barbano, H, E., Lebowitz, B., & Larson, D, M. (1986). Cross-sectional studies of personality in a national sample: Stability in neuroticism, extraversion, and openness. Psychology and Aging, 1(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.1.2.144
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (2008). The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r). The Sage Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, (29)2, 179-198.
Cunado, J., & de Gracia, F. P. (2012). Does Education Affect Happiness? Evidence for Spain. Social Indicator Research, 108, 185–196.
De Vries, R. E., Den-Hoof, H, B, V., & De-Rider, J. A. (2006). Explaining knowledge sharing the role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs. Communication Research, 33(2), 115-135.
Deniz, M, E., & Ahmet, S, S., (2017). The relationships between big five personality traits and subjective vitality. Anales de Psicologia, 33(2), 218-224.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Diener, E., Lucas, R, E., & Oishi, S. (2005). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder., & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 463–73). New York: Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. New York: Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology.
Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 25–41.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Eysenck, S. B., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29.
Freud, S. (1985). The complete letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904. J. M. Masson (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Furnham, A. (1996), “The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality”. Personality and Individual Differences,2 (2), 303-307. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00033-5.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.
Hayes, N., & Joseph, S. (2003). Big five correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4). 723-727.
Helson, R., & Kwan, V., & John, O., & Jones, C. (2002). The growing evidence of personality change in adulthood: Findings from research with personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 287-306.
Johnson, J. A. (1997). Units of analysis for the description and explanation of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs, (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp.767-793). New York: Academic Press.
Judge, T, A., Higgins, C, A., Thoresen, C, J., & Barrick, M, R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621–652.
Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Vintage Books.
Kim, H. J., Shin, K. H., & Swanger, N. (2009). Burnout and Engagement: A comparative analysis using the big five personality dimensions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 96–104.
LePine, J, A., & Dyne, L, V. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326-36. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326.
Lu, L. (1995). The relationship between subjective well-being and psychosocial variables in Taiwan. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135(3), 351–357. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9713964.
Lu, L., & Lin, Y. (1998). Family roles and happiness in adulthood. Pers Individ Dif, 25, 195–207.
Lu, L., & Shih, J.B. (1997). Personality and happiness: Is mental health a mediator? Pers Individ Dif, 22(2), 249-256.
Lu, L., & Shih, J.B. (1997). Sources of happiness: A qualitative approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 181-187. 10.1080/00224549709595429.
Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Müller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. A. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(3), 301-313.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. J. (1985). Updating Norman's "adequate taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. J. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
McCrae, R., Antonio, T., Sánchez-Bernardos, M. L., Dragana, D, J., & Halim, M. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547-561.
Mechinda, P., & Patterson, P, G. (2011). The impact of service climate and service provider personality on employees' customer-oriented behavior in a high-contact setting. Journal of Services Marketing, 25 (2), 101 – 113.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1998). Five reasons why the “big five” article has been frequently cited. Personnel Psychology, 51(4), 849-857. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570. 1998.tb00743. x.
Mroczek, DK., Spiro, A., & Griffin, PW. (2006) Personality and aging. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. editors (6th ed.). New York; Academic Press.
Mullins, L.J. (2005). Management and organizational behavior. England; Pearson Education Limited.
Murray, R., Barrick., Michael, K., Mount., &Strauss, P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal Applied Psychology, 78(5), 715-22.
Ones, D, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F, L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703.
Oreopoulos, P. (2007). Do dropouts drop out too soon? Wealth, health and happiness from compulsory schooling. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2213–2229.
Patel, A. (2013). Person of issue: Sigmund Freud (1856-1939). The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 1 (1), 1-8.
Pervin, L. A., Cevone, D., & John, O. P. (2005). Personality: Theory and research. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Rivera-Vazquez, J. C., Ortiz-Fournier, L. V., & Flores, F. R. (2009). Overcoming cultural barriers for innovation and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(5), 257-270.
Rolland, J-P., & Fruyt, F. D. (2002). The five-factor model of personality across cultures. New York: University Paris X Nanterre.
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 122–135. doi: org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.122.
Salgado, J.F. (1997). The five-factor model of personality a job performance in the European community. The Journal of Applied Psychology 82(1). 30-43. 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2001). Theories of personality (7th ed.). Australia: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Smallwood, J., Andrews-Hanna., & Jessica, R. (2013). Not all minds that wander are lost: The importance of a balanced perspective on the mind-wandering state. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (441), 1-6.
Srivastava, S, John, O.P, Gosling, S.D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.
Sulaiman, A, P. (2019). The impact of education across different subjective well-being domains. Thesis. The University of Tokyo. Tokyo, Japan
Summers, J, D., & Shuffler, M, L. (2018). Using the five factors model to study personality convergence on student engineering design teams. International Design Conference – Design. University Texas of Dallas.
Teh, P.-L., Yong, C.-C., Chong, C.-W., & Yew, S.-Y. (2011). Do the big five personality factors affect knowledge sharing behavior? A study of Malaysian universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 47-62).
Theory of Social Behaviour, 46, 475-501.
Uher, J. (2016a). What is behaviour? And (when) is language behaviour? Journal for the
Uher, J., & Visalberghi, E. (2016). Observation versus assessment of personality: A five method multi-species study reveals numerous biases in ratings and methodological limitations of standardized assessment. Journal Research in Personality, 61, 61-79.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Netherlands, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 10.1007/978-94-009-6432-7.
Wang, C.-C., & Yang, Y.-J. (2007). Personality and intention to share knowledge: An empirical study of scientists in an R&D laboratory. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(10), 1427-1436.
Wang, S., Noe, R. A., & Wang, Z.-M. (2014). Motivating knowledge sharing in knowledge management systems a quasi–field experiment. Journal of Management, 40(4), 978-1009.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Mis Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294–306.
Yakovlev, P., & Leguizamon, S. (2012). Ignorance is not bliss: On the role of education in subjective wellbeing. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 806–815.
Indonesian
Alynudin, S., & Rawinarno, T (2018). Kajian revisi undang-undang no. 5 tahun 2014 tentang aparatur sipil negara. Journal of Government, 3(12), 168-182.
Diponegoro, A. M. (2008). Psikologi konseling islami dan psikologi positif. Yogyakarta: UAD Press.
Fitriana, S. (2019). Peran kepribadian guru dalam proses belajar mengajar (analisis kritiskonstruktif atas pemikiran zakiah daradjat. Journal Muslim Heritage, 4(2), 281-300.
Gunawan, L. R., & Hendriani, W. (2009). Psychological well-being pada guru honorer di Indonesia: A literature review. Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi, 4(1), 105-113.
Hanifa. Muslihudin, M., & Sri Hartati, S. (2016). Sistem pendukung keputusan menentukan besar gaji untuk guru honorer di kabupaten pesawaran menggunakan metode fuzzy saw. Jurnal Teknologi, 9(1), 83-88.
Law. R. I (2011). Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional republik Indonesia. Indonesian law. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/arsip/permen_tahun2011_nomor07.pdf.
Law. R. I. (2005). Tentang guru dan dosen. 14-Th-2005.doc (wordpress.com).
Law. R. I. (2005). Tentang guru dan dosen. 48-Th-2005.doc (wordpress.com).
Ngabiyanto. (2018). Politik guru honorer (sebuah kajian tentang kebijakan terhadap guru honorer dikota Semarang). Forum Ilmu Sosial 45 (2), 143-151.
Setiawan, H. (2014). Psychological well-being pada guru honorer sekolah dasar di kecamatan wonotunggal kabupaten batang. Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Subrata, P. (2015). Hubungan antara Penyesuaian Pernikahan dengan Kepuasan Pernikahan pada Suami Istri Beda Agama. [Skripsi tidak diterbitkan]. Jakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Mercu Buana.
Sunandar., & Asep. (2014). Sistem rekrukmen dan manajerial kompentesi guru. Universitas Negeri Malang. Malang.
Surat, E, M, K. (2019. Surat edaran Menteri ketenagaan kerja. Jakarta
Suryabrata, S. (2002). Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Chinese
呂佳霖（2010）。國小教師組織溝通與教學效能關係之研究 (未出版碩士論文）。檢自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。（系統編號：094NCUE5284028) 。
洪光遠、鄭慧玲(1995) 。人格心理學。臺北市：桂冠。