帳號:guest(18.224.63.189)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:陳麒宇
作者(英文):Chi-Yu Chen
論文名稱:論投票行為與交易決策之關聯性
論文名稱(英文):Relationship between Voting Behavior and Trading Decision
指導教授:翁培師
指導教授(英文):Pei-Shih Weng
口試委員:蔡明宏
翁胤哲
口試委員(英文):Min-Hung Tsay
Yin-Che Weng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學號:610736001
出版年(民國):109
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:69
關鍵詞:政治偏好散戶投資人股票市場
關鍵詞(英文):Political preferenceIndividual investorsStock market
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:10
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
本篇研究論文檢驗投資人投票行為是否與其交易決策具有關聯性,我們假設若某縣(市)區域政黨偏好屬於國民黨,其區域內投資人傾向買入較多的中概股。本篇研究論文使用券商分行交易資料,並且將其由分行級別轉為城市級別。經由實證分析,我們發現偏好國民黨的區域,投資人確實於選舉前顯著買入和賣出更多的中概股。除此之外,若某縣(市)區域發生政黨輪替,由民進黨轉為國民黨執政,亦會於選舉後顯著買入和賣出更多的中概股。我們也發現偏好國民黨的區域,投資人於選舉前交易中概股的績效具有顯著相對的額外損失。另外,此次交易績效無論獲利或損失,皆不影響投資人於下次選舉的投票行為。
This paper examines whether investors’ voting behaviors relate with their trading decisions. We suppose that the investors live in KMT-dominated regions are prone to buy more China concepts stocks. This paper utilizes detailed transaction data transformed from branch-level to city-level of every brokerage branch in Taiwan, and we find support for our conjecture, that is, investors live in KMT-dominated regions buy and sell more China concepts stocks significantly before the election. In addition, if there is any party alternation in counties (cities), for instance DPP incumbent is replaced by KMT challenger, investors live in these kind of regions buy and sell more China concepts stocks significantly after the election. We demonstrate that the performance of trading China concepts stocks before the election is significantly additional loss for those investors live in KMT-dominated regions. However, the above loss won’t change their voting behaviors in the next election.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目標 1
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第三章 樣本資料 7
第一節 交易資料 7
第二節 選舉資料 9
第三節 敘述性統計量 9
第四章 實證分析 11
第一節 圖表實證 11
第二節 投票行為與中概股交易 12
第三節 政黨輪替與選舉後中概股交易 15
第四節 投票行為與中概股績效 16
第五節 下次選舉投票行為與中概股績效 17
第五章 附加性檢測 19
第一節 替代選舉資料與中概股交易 19
第二節 替代選舉資料與中概股績效 20
第六章 結論 23
參考文獻 25
Barber, B. M., Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J., & Odean, T. (2009). Just how much do individual investors lose by trading?. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 609-632.

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 773-806.

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.

Bhattacharya, U., Kuo, W. Y., Lin, T. C., & Zhao, J. (2018). Do superstitious traders lose money?. Management Science, 64(8), 3772-3791.

Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Bonaparte, Y., & Kumar, A. (2013). Political activism, information costs, and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3), 760-786.

Bonaparte, Y., Kumar, A., & Page, J. K. (2017). Political climate, optimism, and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Markets, 34, 69-94.

Bui, D. G., Lin, C. Y., & Lin, T. C. (2018). Tradin’in the Rain: Attention Allocation and Investment Performance. Working Paper.

Di Giuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 158-180.

Elnahas, A. M., & Kim, D. (2017). CEO political ideology and mergers and acquisitions decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 162-175.

Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., Sun, X., & Wu, Q. (2016). CEO political preference and corporate tax sheltering. Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 37-53.

Hirshleifer, D., Jian, M., & Zhang, H. (2018). Superstition and financial decision making. Management Science, 64(1), 235-252.

Hirshleifer, D., & Shumway, T. (2003). Good day sunshine: Stock returns and the weather. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1009-1032.

Hong, H., & Kostovetsky, L. (2012). Red and blue investing: Values and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 1-19.

Hutton, I., Jiang, D., & Kumar, A. (2014). Corporate policies of Republican managers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(5-6), 1279-1310.

Jiang, D., Kumar, A., & Law, K. K. (2016). Political contributions and analyst behavior. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(1), 37-88.

Kaustia, M., & Torstila, S. (2011). Stock market aversion? Political preferences and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 98-112.

Kuo, W. Y., & Lin, T. C. (2013). Overconfident individual day traders: Evidence from the Taiwan futures market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3548-3561.

Levy, O., & Galili, I. (2008). Stock purchase and the weather: Individual differences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(3-4), 755-767.

Merikas, A. A., Merikas, A. G., Vozikis, G. S., & Prasad, D. (2004). Economic factors and individual investor behavior: The case of the Greek stock exchange. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 20(4), 93-98.

Rubin, A. (2008). Political views and corporate decision making: The case of corporate social responsibility. Financial Review, 43(3), 337-360.

Timpone, R. J. (1998). Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 145-158.

Vaaler, P. M., Schrage, B. N., & Block, S. A. (2005). Counting the investor vote: Political business cycle effects on sovereign bond spreads in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 62-88.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.

Wintoki, M. B., & Xi, Y. (2017). Political partisan bias in mutual fund portfolios, Working Paper, University of Kansas.

Wolfinger, R. E., Rosenstone, S. J., & McIntosh, R. A. (1981). Presidential and congressional voters compared. American Politics Quarterly, 9(2), 245-256.
(此全文20250811後開放外部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *