帳號:guest(18.220.107.56)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:韓怡安
作者(英文):Yi-An Han
論文名稱:公司治理評鑑與公司相對股價表現
論文名稱(英文):Corporate governance evaluation and firms' relative stock performance
指導教授:羅德謙
指導教授(英文):Te-Chien Lo
口試委員:池祥萱
蔡維哲
口試委員(英文):Hsiang-Hsuan Chih
Wei-Jhe Cai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學號:610736012
出版年(民國):109
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:44
關鍵詞:企業社會責任公司治理評鑑股價日報酬率
關鍵詞(英文):Corporate Social ResponsibilityCorporate Governance EvaluationDaily Stock Return
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
自我國成立公司治理中心以來,發布公司治理評鑑一直是其主要事務,公司 治理評鑑之評鑑標準與企業社會責任(CSR)息息相關,而企業社會責任與公司 財務績效之相關議題亦為大眾持續關注之焦點,兩者之間的關係不論是正相關、 不相關或負相關,皆有其支持者及支持論點。本篇利用各企業於公司治理評鑑上 之排名,取得兩相異組別,一為公司治理佳之組別,一為公司治理不佳之組別, 持續觀察其三年之報酬率績效。以確認是否符合本篇之假說:公司治理評鑑表現 優良之企業相較於表現不佳者會有較好之財務績效。本篇之研究結果表示,的確 公司治理佳之組別相對於公司治理不佳之組別會有較好的報酬率績效。由此可知, 公司治理評鑑在台灣投資市場內具有一定的可信度,不論是對投資者或企業本身 其皆有相當大的參考價值。
Since the government started to actively develop corporate governance culture, corporate governance evaluation has played a key role. The evaluation criteria of corporate governance evaluation are closely related to corporate social responsibility (CSR), and the issues related to CSR and corporate financial performance are also concerned. As the focus of the public's attention, whether the relationship between the CSR and corporate financial performance is positive, irrelevant, or negative, have their supporters and supporting arguments, respectively. This article uses the rankings of companies in the corporate governance evaluation to obtain two distinct groups, one for good corporate governance and one for poor corporate governance, and continuously observes theirs’ three-year return performances. I would like to confirm whether the results meet the hypothesis of this article: “Companies with good corporate governance evaluation have better financial performance than those with poor performance”. The results show that the group with good corporate governance has better return performance than the group with poor corporate governance. It indicates that the corporate governance assessment has a certain degree of credibility in Taiwan investment market, and no matter investors or enterprises have considerable reference value on it.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 論文架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 企業社會責任與公司財務績效之正向關係 5
第二節 企業社會責任與公司財務績效之關係不顯著與負向關係 6
第三章 研究資料與方法 7
第一節 研究資料 7
第二節 研究方法 8
第四章 研究結果 15
第五章 結論與建議 21
Cochran, P. L. and R. A. Wood (1984). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.
Tsoutsoura, M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Working paper.
McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification. Strategic Management Journal 21:603- 609.
Becchetti, L., R. Cicirettiand, and I. Hasan. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder’s value: An event study analysis. Working Paper.
Cardebat, J. M. and N. Sirven (2010). “What Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Adds to Financial Return?”. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2(2), 20- 27.
Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, No. 3, 425-442.
Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statics, 47, 13-37.
Black, F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. Journal of Business, 45, 444-445.
Fama, E. & French, K. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, No 2, 427-465.
Fama, E. and French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 3-56.
Jegadeesh, N & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers. Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. Journal of Finance, Vol.48, 65–91.
Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 52, No. 1, 57-82.
Preston, L. E. and O'Bannon, D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business and Society, Vol. 36, No. 1, 419- 429.
Barnea, A. and Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 97, No. 1, 71-86.
Malmendier, U. and Tate, G. (2005). CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, No. 6, 2661-2700.
McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., and Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, 854-872.
Waddock, S. A. and Graves, S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, 303-319.
Goss, A. and Roberts, G. S. (2011). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1794-1810.
Kempf, A. and Osthoff, P. (2007). The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing on Portfolio Performance, European Financial Management, Vol. 13, No. 5, 908-922.
Poddi, L. and Vergalli, S. (2009). “Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Performance of Firms?”. Working Paper, University of Ferrara.
Preston, L. E. and O'Bannon, D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business and Society, Vol. 36, No. 1, 419- 429.
Malmendier, U. and Tate, G. (2005). CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, No. 6, 2661-2700.
Schuler, D. A. and Cording, M. (2006). A Corporate Social Performance-Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, 540-558.
(此全文20250719後開放外部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *