帳號:guest(3.142.133.226)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:葉念祖
作者(英文):Nian-Zu Ye
論文名稱:PCAOB檢查、銀行聯貸結構、債務契約條款
論文名稱(英文):PCAOB Inspection, Loan Syndicated Structure, and Bank Loan Contractual Terms
指導教授:姚維仁
指導教授(英文):Wei-Ren Yao
口試委員:李佳玲
曾家璿
陳家慧
口試委員(英文):Chia-Ling Lee
Chia-Hsuan Tseng
Chia-Hui Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:會計與財務碩士學位學程
學號:610738010
出版年(民國):109
畢業學年度:108
語文別:英文
論文頁數:41
關鍵詞:PCAOBPCAOB檢查銀行聯貸結構資訊不對稱債務契約條款
關鍵詞(英文):PCAOBPCAOB inspectionLoan syndicated structureInformation asymmetryBank loan contractual terms
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:17
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:6
  • 收藏收藏:0
過去文獻指出PCAOB檢查將會提升審計品質(DeFond 2010; Fung, Raman and Zhu 2017)。鮮少有文獻探討PCOAB檢查對資本市場之實質經濟效果,故本研究檢測PCAOB檢查對銀行聯貸市場之影響,並假設PCAOB檢查會降低債權人所面臨之資訊風險,從而帶來聯貸市場債權結構與債務契約條款之改變。本研究以美國聯貸市場於2001至2010年PCAOB實行檢查後會計師事務所之借款客戶為測試樣本。本文之實證結果發現如下,首先,於會計師事務所之品質控管改採PCAOB檢查後,債權人將會給予債務人較低的貸款利率。再者,若會計師事務所於檢查報告中被開具缺失於“Part I Findings” and “Part II Findings”,債務人於債務契約簽訂中,將會顯著減少以會計數字為基準之財務條款,並且其被要求擔保品抵押之可能將顯著上升。本文之實證結果表明債務人將改變聯貸市場之債權結構與債務契約條款以回應PCAOB檢查之效果。
Prior studies provide empirical evidence that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspection can improve audit quality (DeFond 2010; Fung, Raman, and Zhu 2017). However, there has limited research to examine the real economic effect of PCAOB inspections. Thus, this paper uses the U.S. syndicated loan data during periods from 2001 to 2010 as a setting. The results are summarized as follows. The regression results show that after auditors adopt PCAOB inspection, there is a significant decrease in spread. Second, when auditors get “Part I Findings” and “Part II Findings” in their inspection report, there is a significant reduction in the number of accounting-based financial covenants and the likelihood of requiring secured. Together, these findings indicate that lenders change in bank loan structure and contractual terms in response to the PCAOB inspection.
1. Introduction 1
2. Background and hypothesis development 7
2.1 Background 7
2.2 Hypothesis development 10
3. Research design and sample selection 15
3.1 Research design 15
3.2 Sample selection 18
4. Empiric results 19
4.1. Sample distribution and descriptive statistics 19
4.2. Changes in the retained rate of lead arranger(s) after audit firms adopt PCAOB inspection 20
4.3. Changes in price and non-price contractual terms after audit firms adopt PCAOB inspection 21
4.4. Changes in price and non-price contractual terms when auditors get “Part_ I_Findings” and “Part_ II_Findings” in their inspection report 23
5. Summary and conclusion 25
6. Reference 27
7. Appendix A 31
Abott, L. J., K. A. Gunny, and T. C. Zhang. 2013. When the PCAOB talks,who listens? Evidence from stakeholder reaction to GAAP-deficient PCAOB inspection reports of small auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32: 1-31
Anantharaman, D. 2012. Comparingself-regulationand statutory regulation: evidence from the accounting profession. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37:55-77.
Ball, R. T., R. M. Bushman, and F. P. Vasvari. 2008. The debt-contracting value of accounting information and loan syndicate structure. Journal of Accounting Research 46: 247-287.
Bharath, S. T., J. Sunder, and S. Sunder. 2008. Accounting quality and debt contracting. The Accounting Review 83: 1-28.
Bulter, H. N., and L. E. Ribstein. 2006. The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting. Journal of Financial Economics 79: 35-67.
Carcello, J. V., C. Holliingsworth, and S. A. Mastrolia. 2011. The effect of PCAOB inspection on big4 audit quality. Research in Accounting Regulation 23:85-96.
Church, B. K.,and L. B. Shefchik.2012. PCAOB inspection and large accounting firms. Accounting Horizons 26:43-63.
Costello, A. M. and R. Wittenberg-Moerman. 2011. The impact of financial reporting quality on debt contracting: evidence from internal control weakness reports. Journal of Accounting Research 49: 97-136.
Dee, C., A. Lulseged and T. Zhang. 2011. Client stock market reaction to PCAOB sanctions against a Big 4 auditor. Contemporary Accounting Research 28:231-246.
Dennis, S., and D. J. Mullineaux. 2000. Syndicated loans. Journal of Financial Intermediation 9: 404-426.
DeFond, M. L., and C. S. Lennox. 2017. Do PCAOB inspection improve the quality of internal control audits? Journal of Accounting Research 55: 591-627
DeFond, M. L. 2010. How should the auditors be audited? Comparing the PCAOB inspections with the AICPA peer reviews. Journal of Accounting and Economics 49: 104-108.
Diamond, D. W., and R. E. Verrecchia. 1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance 46: 1325-1359
Doty, J. 2011. The reliability, role and relevance of the audit: A turning point. Baruch College, NewYork,NY(May5).<http://pcaobus.org/News/Speech/Pages/05052011_KeynoteAddress.
aspx>.
Dowling, C., W. R. Knechel, and R. Moroney. 2015. Public oversight of audit firms: the slippery slope of enforcing regulation. Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney 54: 353-380.
Easley, D., S. Hvidkjaer and M. O’Hara. 2002. Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? Journal of Finance 57: 2185–2210.
Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance 59: 1553-1583.
George, S. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics 2: 3-21
Glover, S. M., D. F. Prawitt, and M. H. Taylor. 2009. Audit standard setting and inspection for U.S. public companies: a critical assessment and recommendations for fundamental change.
Accounting Horizons 23: 221-237.
Gipper, B., C. Leuz, and M. Maffett. 2019. Public oversight and reporting credibility: evidence from the PCAOB audit inspection regime. The Review of Financial Studies: Accepted.
Glover, S., D, Prawitt, and M. Taylor. 2009. Audit standard-setting and inspection for U.S. public 28 companies: a critical assessment and recommendations for fundamental change. Accounting
Horizons 23: 221-237
Graham, J.R., S. Li, and J. Qiu. 2008. Corporate misreporting and bank loan contracting. Journal of Financial Economics 89: 4-61.
Gramling, A. A., J. Krishnan, and Y. Zhang. 2011. Are PCAOB identified audit deficiencies associated with a change in reporting decisions of triennially inspected audit firms?
Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory 30:59-79
Gunny, K, and T. C. Zhang. 2012. PCAOB inspection reports and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32:136-160
Hail, L., A. Tahoun, and C. Wang. 2018. Corporate scandals and regulation. Journal of Accounting Research 56: 617-671.
Hermanson, D. R., R. W. Houston, and J. C. Rice. 2007. PCAOB inspections of smaller CPA firms: initial evidence from inspection reports. Accounting Horizons 21: 137-152.
Hilary, G., and C. S. Lennox. 2005. The credibility of self-regulation: evidence from the accounting profession’s peer review program. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40:211-229
Houston, R. W, and C. M. Stefaniak. 2013. Audit partner perceptions of post-audit review mechanisms:anexamination of internal quality reviews and PCAOB inspections. Accounting
Horizons 27:23-49.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360.
Johnson, L. M., M. B. Keune, and J. Winchel. 2019. U.S. auditors’perceptions of the PCAOB inspection process: a behavioral examination. Contemporary Accounting Research 36: 1540-1574.
Kim, O.,and R. E. Verrecchia. 1991. Trading volume and price reactions to public announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 29:302-321
Landis, M., S. Jerris, and M. Braswell. 2011. Auditing the auditors: Evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms. Journal of Accounting Economics 49:
84-103.
Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R. E. Verrecchia. 2007. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45: 385-420.
Lennox, C. S., and J. A. Pittman. 2009. Auditing the auditors: evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms. Journal of Accounting Economics s49:84-103.
Leftwich, R. 1983. Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements. The Accounting Review 58: 23–42.
Mansi, S. A., W. F. Maxwell, and D. P. Miller. 2004. Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research 42: 755-793.
Minnis, M. 2011. The value of financial statement verification in debt financing: evidence from private U.S. firms. Journal of Accounting Research 49: 457-506.
Nikolaev, V. 2010. Debt covenants and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research 48: 137–175.
Peltzman, S. 1976. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19:211-240.
Pittman, J.A., and S. Fortin. 2004. Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 113-136.
Rajan, R.G. 1992. Insiders and outsiders: the choice between informed and arm’s-length debt. The Journal of Finance 47: 1367-1400.
Raja, R., and A. Winston. 1995. Covenants and collateral as incentives to monitor. Journal of Finance50: 1113–1146.
Romano, S. 2005. “The Sarbanes—Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governence.” Yale Law Journal 34:1-33
Shroff, N. 2019. Real effect of PCAOB international inspections. The Accounting Review: Accepted.
Sufi, A. 2007. Information asymmetry and financing arrangements: evidence from syndicated loans. The Journal of Finance 62: 629-668.
Watts, R. L., amd J. L. Zimmerman. 1983. Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: some evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics 26: 613-633
Zhang, J. 2008. The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 46: 27-54.
(此全文20250629後開放外部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *