帳號:guest(18.117.230.81)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:陳思羽
作者(英文):Su-Yu Chen
論文名稱:高階經理人與非主管階級員工間薪酬差距對公司績效之影響
論文名稱(英文):The Impact of the Compensation Gap between Executives and Non-Managerial Employees on Firm Performance
指導教授:林穎芬
指導教授(英文):Ying-Fen Lin
口試委員:汪志勇
姚維仁
口試委員(英文):Chih-Yung Wang
Wei-Ren Yao
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學號:610834012
出版年(民國):110
畢業學年度:109
語文別:中文
論文頁數:50
關鍵詞:競賽理論非主管階級員工公司治理薪酬差距
關鍵詞(英文):Tournament TheoryNon-Managerial EmployeesCorporate GovernanceCompensation Gap
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:202
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:1
  • 收藏收藏:0
競賽理論認為薪酬差距的增長幅度會影響員工的積極性,而員工行為則會反映在公司績效上,並指出薪酬差距對公司績效有良好之影響。先前相關研究皆圍繞在高階經理人上,近年來非主管階級員工也逐漸受到重視,因此本論文主要探討高階經理人與非主管階級員工間薪酬差距是否會影響公司績效。為了了解公司治理是否能扮演好監督之角色,能否對競賽理論產生作用,因此本論文以董事會及薪酬委員會衡量公司治理之有效性,探討公司治理如何對競賽理論產生效果。
本論文使用2018年及2019年台灣上市上櫃公司,共2,484個觀察值進行分析。結果發現,競賽理論亦適用在高階經理人與非主管階級員工之關係,兩者薪酬差距越大,將使公司績效越好。除此之外,研究結果表明,高階經理人與非主管階級員工間薪酬差距與公司績效之關係取決於公司治理之效果。表示擁有良好公司治理之環境,能夠增強競賽理論作用。
Tournament theory believes that the increase in the compensation gap will affect the enthusiasm of employees, and employee behavior will be reflected to firm performance, and shows that the compensation gap has a good impact on firm performance. Previous researches on tournament theory have investigated the compensation of executives. In recent years, non-managerial employees have gradually gained recognition. Therefore, this paper mainly discusses whether the compensation gap between executives and non-managerial employees affect firm performance. In order to realize whether corporate governance can play a good role in supervision and whether it can have an effect on tournament theory, this paper uses the board of directors and compensation committee to measure the effectiveness of corporate governance, and investigates how corporate governance has an effect on tournament theory.
Based on 2,484 firm-years observations for Taiwanese listed firms during 2018-2019. Results show that the tournament theory is also suitable for the relationship between executives and non-managerial employees. The greater the compensation gap between executives and non-managerial employees, the better the firm performance become. In addition, Results show that the compensation gap between executives and non-managerial employees and firm performance depends on the effect of corporate governance. It means that having a good corporate governance environment can enhance the role of tournament theory.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究架構及流程 5
第二章 文獻探討及假說建立 9
第一節 競賽理論模型 9
第二節 高階經理人間薪酬差距與公司績效 11
第三節 高階經理人與非主管階級員工間薪酬差距與公司績效 13
第四節 公司治理對薪酬差距與公司績效之影響 15
第三章 研究設計 19
第一節 研究樣本、研究期間及資料來源 19
第二節 變數定義 22
第三節 實證模型 26
第四章 實證結果 29
第一節 敘述性統計 29
第二節 相關係數分析 33
第三節 實證結果分析 35
第五章 討論與結論 43
第一節 討論 43
第二節 結論 45
第三節 管理意涵 46

王定傳 (2021)。涉掏空蘋果西打母公司 前總經理孫幼英被判董事職務解任。自由時報。取自:https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3457308
吳幸蓁、謝佳純、梁書瑋 (2014)。薪酬委員會之設置及其品質對高階經理人薪酬績效敏感性之影響。中華會計學刊,10(2),135-188。
徐怡、邱世熒 (2010)。資本支出、企業規模與研發投資對企業績效之影響。數據分析,5(3),1-21。
Abdul Gafoor, C. P., Mariappan, V., & Thyagarajan, S. (2018). Board characteristics and bank performance in India. IIMB Management Review, 30(2), 160-167.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
Ahmed Sheikh, N., Wang, Z., & Khan, S. (2013). The impact of internal attributes of corporate governance on firm performance: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(1), 38-55.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
Ali, S., Zhang, J., Usman, M., Khan, M. K., Khan, F. U., & Siddique, M. A. (2020). Do tournament incentives motivate chief executive officers to be socially responsible? Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(5), 597-619.
Anabtawi, I. (2005). Explaining pay without performance: The tournament alternative. Emory Law Journal, 54, 1557-1602.
Andonova, V., & Ruíz-Pava, G. (2016). The role of industry factors and intangible assets in company performance in Colombia. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4377-4384.
Ang, J. S., Hauser, S., & Lauterbach, B. (1998). Contestability and pay differential in the executive suites. European Financial Management, 4(3), 335-360.
Baik, B., Evans, J. H., Kim, K., & Yanadori, Y. (2016). White collar incentives. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 53, 34-49.
Bathula, H. (2008). Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from New Zealand. Auckland University of Technology.
Beatty, R. P., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 313-335.
Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1992). The Incentive Effects of Tournament Compensation Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), 336-350.
Benkraiem, R., Hamrouni, A., Lakhal, F., & Toumi, N. (2017). Board independence, gender diversity and CEO compensation. Corporate Governance, 17(5), 845-860.
Bloom, M. (1999). The Performance Effects of Pay Dispersion on Individuals and Organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 22-40.
Breza, E., Kaur, S., & Shamdasani, Y. (2018). The Morale Effects of Pay Inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2), 611–663.
Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2004). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. SSRN.
Buachoom, W. (2017). Simultaneous relationship between performance and executive compensation of Thai non-financial firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(3), 404-423.
Buchdadi, A. D., & Chou, T. K. (2017). Could independent board, board meeting, audit committee, and risk committee improve the asset quality and operational performance a study of listed banks in Indonesia. Pressacademia, 4(3), 247-254.
Buchdadi, A., Ulupui, I., Dalimunthe, S., Pamungkas, B., and Fauziyyah, Y. (2019). Board of Director Meeting and Firm Performance. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(2), 1-7.
Burns, N., Minnick, K., & Starks, L. (2017). CEO Tournaments: A Cross-Country Analysis of Causes, Cultural Influences, and Consequences. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), 519-551.
Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2002). Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 23, 367-375.
Chen, J., Ezzamel, M., & Cai, Z. (2011). Managerial power theory, tournament theory, and executive pay in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4). 1176-1199.
Connelly, B. L., Tihanyi, L., Crook, T. R., & Gangloff, K. A. (2014). Tournament Theory: Thirty Years of Contests and Competitions. Journal of Management, 40(1), 16-47.
Conyon, M. J., & Peck, S. I. (1998). Board control, remuneration committees, and management compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 135–145.
Ding, D. Z., Akhtar, S., & Ge, G. L. (2009). Effects of inter- and intra-hierarchy wage dispersions on firm performance in Chinese enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 2370–2381.
Downes, P. E., & Choi, D. (2014). Employee reactions to pay dispersion: A typology of existing research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 53-66.
Ederhof, M. (2011). Incentive Compensation and Promotion-Based Incentives of Mid-Level Managers: Evidence from a Multinational Corporation. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 131–153.
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Bognanno, M. L. (1990). The Incentive Effects of Tournaments Revisited: Evidence from the European PGA Tour. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 43(3), 74-88.
Elsayed, K. (2007). Does CEO Duality Really Affect Corporate Performance? Corporate governance: an international review, 15(6), 1203-1214.
Eluyela, D. F., Akintimehin, O. O., Okere, W., Ozordi, E., Osuma, G. O., Ilogho, S. O., & Oladipo, O. A. (2018). Board meeting frequency and firm performance: Examining the nexus in Nigerian deposit money banks. Heliyon, 4(10).
Gilsdorfa, K. F., & Sukhatme, V. A. (2008). Tournament incentives and match outcomes in women’s professional tennis. Applied Economics, 40(18), 2405-2412.
Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Institutional investors and executive compensation. Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2351–2374.
Heyman, F. (2005). Pay inequality and firm performance: evidence from matched employer–employee data. Applied Economics, 37(11), 1313-1327.
Hunnes, A. (2009). Internal wage dispersion and firm performance: White-collar evidence. International Journal of Manpower, 30(8), 776-796.
Ikäheimo, S., Kallunki, J. P., Moilanen, S., & Schiehll, E. (2018). Do White-Collar Employee Incentives Improve Firm Profitability? Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 95–115.
Iwu-Egwuonwu, R. C. (2010). Some Empirical Literatures Evidence on the Effects of Independent Directors on Firm Performance. Journal of economics and International finance, 2(9), 190-198.
Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2009). Self-selection, endogeneity, and the relationship between CEO duality and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10), 1092-1112.
Jaafar, A., Hodgkinson, L., & Kao, M. F. (2019). Ownership Structure, Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance, 19(1), 189-216.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Judge, W. Q., Naoumova, I., & Koutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: an empirical study. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 385-396.
Kanapathippillai, S., Gula, F., Mihretb, D., & Muttakina, M. B. (2019). Compensation committees, CEO pay and firm performance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 101187.
Kato, T., & Long, C. (2011). Tournaments and managerial incentives in China's listed firms: New evidence. China Economic Review, 22(1), 1-10.
Lallemand, T., Plasman, R., & Rycx, F. (2003). Intra-firm wage dispersion and fîrm performance: a review and empirical tests on Belgian data. Brussels Economic Review, 46(4), 5-30.
Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 843-864.
Lee, K. W., Lev, B., & Yeo, G. H. (2007). Executive pay dispersion, corporate governance, and firm performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 30(3), 315-338.
Lee, S. and Chen, H. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value as determinants of CEO compensation in Taiwan: 2SLS for panel data model. Management Research Review, 34(3), 252-265.
Leonard, J. S. (1990). Executive Pay and Firm Performance. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 43(3), 13-29.
Lin, B. X., & Lu, R. (2009). Managerial power, compensation gap and firm performance — Evidence from Chinese public listed companies. Global Finance Journal, 20(2), 153-164.
Lin, C. J. (2011). An Examination of Board and Firm Performance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 5(4), 17-34.
Lin, Y. F., Yeh, Y. M. C., & Shih, Y. T. (2013). Tournament theory's perspective of executive pay gaps. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 585-592.
Liu, P., Hosain, M. S., & Li, L. (2019). Does the compensation gap between executives and staffs influence future firm performance? The moderating roles of managerial power and overconfidence. International Journal of Management and Economics, 55(4), 287-318.
Nieken, P., & Sliwka, D. (2010). Risk-taking tournaments: Theory and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 254-268.
O'Shaughnessy, K. C. (1998). The Structure of White-Collar Compensation and Organizational Performance. Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 53(3), 458-485.
Pervan, M., & Višić, J. (2012). Influence of firm size on its business success. Croatian Operational Research Review, 3(1), 213-223.
Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 382-407.
Rashid, A. (2010). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from a developing country. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8(1), 163-175.
Reguera-Alvarado, N., & Bravo, F. (2017). The effect of independent directors’ characteristics on firm performance: Tenure and multiple directorships. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 590-599.
Rodriguez-Fernandez, M., Fernandez-Alonso, S., & Rodriguez-Rodriguez, J. (2014). Board characteristics and firm performance in Spain. Corporate Governance, 14(4), 485-503.
Sanchez-Marin, G., & Baixauli-Soler, J. S. (2015). TMT pay dispersion and firm performance: the moderating role of organizational governance effectiveness. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(4), 436-459.
Strydom, M., & Rankin, M. (2012). Promotion Incentives, CEO Appointments and Firm Performance. 25th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference 2012, SSRN.
Sun, J., & Cahan, S. (2009). The Effect of Compensation Committee Quality on the Association between CEO Cash Compensation and Accounting Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 193-207.
Talavera, O., Yin, S., & Zhang, M. (2018). Tournament incentives, age diversity and firm performance: Evidence from China. SSRN.
Vieito, J. P. T. (2012). Gender, Top Management Compensation Gap, and Company Performance: Tournament versus Behavioral Theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(1), 46-63.
Wahba, H. (2013). Debt and financial performance of SMEs: the missing role of debt maturity structure. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(3), 266-277.
Yang, H., & Klaas, B. S. (2011). Pay dispersion and the financial performance of the firm: evidence from Korea. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(10), 2147-2166.
Yang, J. D., Xie, T., & Lian, H. P. (2019). The relationship between internal pay gap and performance of listed companies in high-tech industry. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 346, 499-507.
Yang, L. W., Yang, Y. F., & Su, W. H. (2015). Salary gap and operating performance: perspective of tournament theory. Global Journal of Business Research, 9(1), 15-26.
Zabel, A., & Roe, B. (2009). Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 126-134.
(此全文20260713後開放外部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *