帳號:guest(3.144.252.196)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:劉懿萱
作者(英文):Yi-Xuan Liu
論文名稱:公司策略對避稅和盈餘管理的影響
論文名稱(英文):Corporate Strategy, Tax Avoidance and Earnings Management
指導教授:池祥萱
指導教授(英文):Hsiang-Hsuan Chih
口試委員:陳嬿如
翁培師
口試委員(英文):Yenn-Ru Chen
Pei-Shih Weng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學號:610836008
出版年(民國):109
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:75
關鍵詞:公司策略避稅盈餘管理財務績效
關鍵詞(英文):corporate strategytax avoidanceearnings managementfinancial performance
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:10
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:1
  • 收藏收藏:0
本文使用Miles and Snow (1978, 2003)所建構的公司策略理論框架,來研究不同的公司策略對於從事避稅活動和盈餘管理活動的影響,並根據此關聯更進一步探討與公司財務績效的關係。本文的研究結果如下:第一,我們使用有效稅率來衡量企業的避稅活動,我們發現平均而言,攻擊者比起防守者與分析者,更顯著會從事避稅活動。第二,我們使用裁量性應計項與盈餘平穩來衡量企業的盈餘管理活動,平均而言,防守者比起攻擊者與分析者,不論是使用裁量性應計項或是盈餘平穩的方式,防守者都更顯著會從事盈餘管理活動。第三,根據以上結果,我們再深入探討不同策略選擇避稅或是盈餘管理活動時,對下一期財務績效的影響。結果顯示,攻擊者從事避稅活動,比起防守者與分析者從事避稅活動,攻擊者下一期的ROA顯著較低;防守者使用盈餘平穩進行盈餘管理,比起攻擊者與分析者,下一期的ROA沒有顯著較高。而防守者使用裁量性應計項進行盈餘管理,比起攻擊者與分析者,下一期的ROA會顯著較高。
This paper uses the corporate strategy theoretical framework constructed by Miles and Snow (1978, 2003) to find the impact of different corporate strategies on tax avoidance activities and earnings management activities, and further explores the relationship with corporate financial performance based on this association. The results of this study are as follows: First, we use effective tax rates to measure tax avoidance activities of firms. We find that on average, prospectors are more likely to engage in tax avoidance activities than defenders and analysts. Second, we use discretionary accruals and earnings smoothing to measure the firms' earnings management activities. On average, defenders compare to prospectors and analysts, whether they use discretionary accruals or earnings smoothing. Defenders are more likely to engage in earnings management activities. Third, based on the above results, we will further discuss the impact of different strategies on tax avoidance or earnings management activities on the corporate financial performance. The results show that the prospectors are engaged in tax avoidance activities. Compared with the defenders and analysts engaged in tax avoidance activities, the ROA of prospectors in the next period is significantly lower; the defenders use earnings smoothing for earnings management, the ROA of the next period is not significantly higher than others. The defender uses discretionary accruals for earnings management. Compared with attackers and analysts, the ROA of the next period will be significantly higher.
第一章 前言 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究架構與流程 6
第二章 文獻回顧與假說發展 7
第一節 公司策略的發展 7
第二節 公司策略與避稅 8
第三節 公司策略與盈餘管理 10
第三章 研究方法 13
第一節 資料來源與樣本選取 13
第二節 公司策略衡量 13
第三節 避稅程度衡量 15
第四節 盈餘管理衡量 16
第五節 控制變數衡量 18
第六節 研究模型設計 19
第四章 實證結果與分析 25
第一節 樣本分布 25
第二節 敘述統計與相關分析 25
第三節 公司策略對避稅的影響 27
第四節 公司策略對盈餘管理的影響 28
第五節 公司策略、避稅和盈餘管理對財務績效的影響 31
第五章 結論 35
參考文獻 37
孫健、王百強、曹豐、劉向強,「公司策略影響盈餘管理嗎?」,管理世界,2016年第3期,160–166頁。
黃美祝、汪瑞芝,「企業避稅對負債水準之影響」,會計審計論叢,第5卷第2期,2015 年 12 月,1–32頁。
Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C. and Sharp, N. Y. (2013). Business strategy, audit fees and financial reporting irregularities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30 (2), 780–817.
Bowen, R. M., Rajgopal, S., and Venkatachalam, M. (2008). Accounting discretion, corporate governance and firm performance, Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (2), 351– 405.
Brav, A., Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., and Michaely, R. (2005). Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 77 (3), 483–527.
Burgstahlera, D., and Dichevb, Ilia. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99–126.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., and Shevlin T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non–family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95 (1), 41–61.
Chen, K. P., and C. Y. C. Chu. 2005. Internal control versus external manipulation: A model of corporate income tax evasion. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (1), 151-164.
Christie, A. A., and Zimmerman, J. L. (1994). Efficient and opportunistic choices of accounting procedures: Corporate control contests. The Accounting Review, 69 (4), 539–566.
De Waegenaere, A., Sansing, R. C., and Wielhouwer, J. (2015). Financial accounting measures of tax aggressiveness: Contracting and Measurement. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32 (1), 223–41.

DeAngelo, H., and Masulis, R. W. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (1), 3–29.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1986). Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: a study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review, 61 (3), 400–420.
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., and Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 70 (2), 193–225.
DeFond, M. L., and Park, C.W. (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23 (2), 115–139.
Demerjian, P., Lev, B., and McVay, S. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58 (7), 1229–1248.
Demerjian, P., Lewis–Western, M., and McVay. S. (2020). How does intentional earnings smoothing vary with managerial ability? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 35(2), 406–437.
Dent, J. F. (1990). Strategy, Organization and Control: Some Possibilities for Accounting Research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1)–(2), 3–25.
Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., and Maydew, E. (2008). Long–run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83 (1), 61–82.
Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., and Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 31 (1–3), 255–307
Fee, C. E., and Hadlock, C. J. (2003). Raids, rewards, and reputations in the market for managerial talent. Review of Financial Studies, 16 (4), 1315–1357.
Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J. (1995). A theory of income and dividend smoothing based on incumbency rents. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 75–93.
Gupta, S., and Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal study. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16 (1), 1–34.
Hanlon, M., and Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93 (1–2), 126–141.
Higgins, D., Omer, T. C., and Phillips, J. D. (2015). The influence of firm’s business strategy on its tax aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32 (2), 674–702.
Holthausen, R. W., Larcker, D. F., and Sloan R. G. (1995). Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19 (1), 29–74.
Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F. and Rajan, M. V. (1997). The Choice of Performance Measures in Annual Bonus Contracts. The Accounting Review, 72 (2), 231–255.
Jiraporn, P., Kim, Y., and Mathur, I. (2008). Does corporate diversification exacerbate or mitigate earnings management? : An empirical analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(5), 1087–1109.
Jiraporn, P., Miller, G., Yoon, S., and Kim, Y. (2008). Is earnings management opportunistic or beneficial? An agency theory perspective. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(3), 622–634.
Lanis, R., and Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30 (1), 50–70.
Lanis, R., and Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31 (1), 86–108.
Lambert, R. A. (2001). Contracting theory and accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32 (1–3), 3–87.
Michelson, S. E., Jordan–Wagner, J., and Wootton, C. W. (2000). The relationship between the smoothing of reported income and risk–adjusted returns. Journal of Economic and Finance, 24 (2), 141–159.
Miles, R. E., and Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Miles, R. E., and Snow, C. C. (2003). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Phillips, J. (2003). Corporate tax–planning effectiveness: The role of compensation–based incentives. The Accounting Review, 78 (3), 847–874.
Robinson, J., Sikes, S., and Weaver, C. (2010). The impact of evaluating the tax department as a profit center on effective tax rates. The Accounting Review, 85 (3), 1035–64.
Ronen, J., and Sadan, S. (1981). Smoothing income numbers: Objectives and implications. Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA (1981)
Sartori, N. (2009) Effects of strategic tax behaviors on corporate governance. Working paper: University of Michigan School of Law.
Schipper, K. (1989). Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons, 3 (4), 91–102.
Sweeney, A. P. (1994). Debt–covenant violations and managers' accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17 (3), 281–308.
(此全文20250630後開放外部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *