帳號:guest(3.145.63.158)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:Dong Hai Ly
作者(英文):Dong Hai Ly
論文名稱:THE EVALUATION OF VIETNAM LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDER SELECTIONS VIA FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS METHODOLOGY (FAHP)
論文名稱(英文):THE EVALUATION OF VIETNAM LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDER SELECTIONS VIA FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS METHODOLOGY (FAHP)
指導教授:陳正杰
指導教授(英文):Cheng-Chieh (Frank) Chen
口試委員:黃郁文
蔡豐明
口試委員(英文):Juhwen Hwang
Feng-Ming Tsai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:運籌管理研究所
學號:610937011
出版年(民國):111
畢業學年度:110
語文別:英文
論文頁數:74
關鍵詞(英文):logistics service providers (LSPs)decision-makingFuzzy AHP
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:29
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:4
  • 收藏收藏:0
It is critical for decision makers in today's competitive corporate environment to have access to decision support tools in order to make rapid, correct, and accurate judgments. The selection of logistics service providers is one of these decisionmaking areas. The selection of a logistics service provider is a multi-criteria decision-making process that involves balancing competing objectives such as quality, cost, and delivery time. This would be a complicated and time-consuming operation if it is not supported by a system.
Despite the fact that the term "logistics service provider selection" is frequently used in the literature, and various approaches and models have been developed to assist decision makers, little attempts have been made to construct a system based on any of these methods.
In this thesis, a decision support system for logistics service provider selection is developed, which is based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique, which is often used for multi-criteria decision-making issues. Because fuzzy concepts and the use of empirical data are thought to increase the capabilities of any modeling technique, including them into a model will result in a more powerful system. A case study at an example firm was done to validate the choice of the Fuzzy AHP model as well as the conceptual design of the logistics service provider selection decision support system.
As a result, this study uses a FAHP approach to identify the factors that have an impact on the capacity of Vietnam's logistics firms while also examining the results in relation to those aspects. By doing this, domestic businesses may operate more effectively while also being more competitive.
ABSTRACT.................................................................I
ACKNOWLEGDEMENTS ........................................................ II
CONTENTS..................................................................III
FIGURES CATALOGUE...........................................................V
TABLES CATALOGUE........................................................... VI
I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................1
1.1 Background.............................................................1
1.2 Research Objective.....................................................2
1.3 Research framework.....................................................3
1.4 Research Scope.........................................................4
1.5 Organization .........................................................5
II. LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................7
2.1 Relevant Logistics theories ...........................................7
2.1.1 Logistics definitions.................................................7
2.1.2 Main type of Logistics services ......................................9
2.1.3 Logistics classifications ...........................................10
2.2 Overview of Vietnam’s logistics industry...............................12
2.2.1 Transportation .......................................................12
2.2.2 Forwarding ...........................................................12
2.2.3 Warehousing ..........................................................13
2.3 Impact of the Covid 19 pandemic on Vietnam’s logistics industry............14
2.3.1 Impact on import and export..........................................14
2.3.2 Impact on transport activities.......................................15
2.3.3 The impact on labor and employment-cuts..............................15
2.4 Evaluation system of the logistics supplier selection..................17
2.4.1 Tangibility and Technology...........................................17
2.4.2 Capabilities.........................................................19
2.4.3 Price................................................................21
2.4.4 Brand image ........................................................22
2.4.5 Development potential ...............................................22
III. METHODLOGY ...........................................................25
3.1 Analytical Hierarchy Process Method (AHP)..............................25
3.2 Fuzzy number ...........................................................28
3.3 Triangle fuzzy number (TFN) ...........................................28
3.4 Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method (FAHP).......................30
3.5 Structuring Selection Model............................................33
3.6 Data collection and Questionnaire design...............................34
3.7 Integration of decision-makers' responds and data input.............35
3.7.1 The fuzzy evaluation matrix with second level-indicator..............35
3.7.2 Evaluation of second-level indicators regard to “Tangibility Technology” (C1) ...40
3.7.3 Evaluation of second-level indicators regard to “Capabilities” (C2) ...41
3.7.4 Evaluation of second-level indicators regard to “Price” (C3) ..............43
3.7.5 Evaluation of second-level indicators regard to “Brand image” (C4)..44
3.7.6 Evaluation of second-level indicators regard to “Development potential
(B2B)” (C5) ..............................................................45
IV. RESULTS ...............................................................47
V. CONCLUSION .............................................................51
5.1 Discussion.............................................................51
5.2 Recommendation and Future work.........................................52
5.3 Suggest Strategies in Future ........................................53
REFRENCES .................................................................55
APPENDIX .................................................................58
Arsova, M. (2020). The importance of location in transport - logistics companies. Journal of Economics, 5, 31-38.
Banomyong, R. and Supatn, N. (2011). Selecting logistics providers in Thailand: a shippers’ perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 45(3),419-437
Bienstock, C.C., Mentzer, J.T., and Bird, M.M. (1997). Measuring physical distribution service quality. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 25(1), 31-44.
Bradley, P. (1994). Contract logistics: it’s all about costs. Purchasing, 117(6), 56.
Calza, F., and Passaro, R. (1997). EDI network and logistics management at Unilever‐
Sagit. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2(4), 158-170.
Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.
Chen, I.S., Fung, P.K., and Yuen, S.S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities of logistics service providers: Antecedents and performance implications. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(4), 1058-1075.
Deng, H., (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair wise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21 (3), 215-231.
Chan, F.T., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M.K., Lau, H.C., and Choy, K. (2008). Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(14), 3825-3857.
General Statistics Office (GSO). (2020). Monthly socio-economic information. General Statistics Office Publishing.
General Statistics Office. (2020a). Labor survey report for Quarter 2, 2020. Available at: https://www.gso.gov.vn/Default.aspx?tabid=512.
Ghoumrassi, A. and Tigu, G, (2018). The impact of the logistics management in customer satisfaction, 12(1), 407-415.
Goldsby, T.J., & Martichenko, R. (2005). Lean Six Sigma Logistics. Boca, FL, USA: J. Ross Publishing.
Gronroos, C. (1984) A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, 8, 36-44.
Guoyi, X. and Chen, X., (2012). The Third-Party Logistics Supplier Selection and Evaluation. Journal of Software, 7(8), 1783-1790.
Knellinger, N. (2020). How Location Makes Supply Chain Management More Efficient and Effective.
Kong, R. and Mayo, M. (1993), Measuring Service Quality in the Business-to-Business Context. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 8 (2), 5-15.
Le, V.H. (2020). The impact of the covid-19 pandemic to logistics activities in Vietnam, 142- 152.
Le, Q.L. (2015). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến quyết định lựa chọn nhà cung cấp dịch vụ logistics
tại tỉnh Bình Dương.
Lieb, R., and Brooks A.B. (2005). The Use of Third-Party Logistics Services by Large American Manufacturers: The 2004 Survey. Transportation Journal, 44(2), 5-15.
Lynch C.F., (2000). Logistics outsourcing: a management guide. Illinois, USA: Council of Logistics Management Publications.
Ma X.F., Lewis Y., Sun S.D. (2003). Supply Chain Management Third Party Logistics
Enterprises Evaluation and Selection. Computer Engineering and Applications, (2), 45- 67.
Maltz, A.B. (1995). Why you outsource dictates how. Transportation & Distribution, 36(3),73-80.
Ministry of Industry and Trade. (2020). Vietnam Logistics Report. Report summarizing work in 2020 and 5 years 2016 - 2020, implementing tasks in 2021 of Industry and Trade. Hanoi: Industry and Trade Publishing House.
Ministry of Industry and Trade. (2019). Vietnam Logistics Report: Logistics increases the value of agricultural products. Hanoi: Industry and Trade Publishing House.
Nikbin, D., Ismail, I., Marimuthu, M., and Abu-Jarad, I.Y. (2011). The impact of firm reputation on customers’ responses to service failure: the role of failure attributions. Business Strategy Series, 12, 19-29.
Parola, F. and Veenstra, Albert W., (2008). The spatial coverage of shipping lines and container terminal operators. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(4), 292-299.
Ruston A., Croucher P., and Baker P. (2008). The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management 2008, 3th Ed. Philadelphia, U.S.A: Kogan Page.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saez, S. (2010). Directions in Development: Trade in Services Negotiations: A Guide for Developing Countries. World Bank Publications.
Soltani, A. and Marandi, E.Z. (2011). Hospital site selection using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making process. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, 5(1), 32-43.
Stank, T.P. and Daugherty, P.J.. (1997). The impact of operating environment on the formation of cooperative logistics relationships. Logistics and Transportation Review, 33(1), 53-65.
Stank, T.P. and Daugherty, P.J. (1997). The impact of operating environment on the formation of cooperative logistics relationships. Logistics and Transportation Review, 33(1), 53-65.
Tam, M.C.Y. and Tummala, V.M.R. (2001). An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29(2), 171-182.
The Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VCCI). (2020). Report on Implementation results of Resolution 35/NQ-CP in May, 2020.
Thompson, T. J. (1996). An analysis of third party logistics and implications for USAF logistics. Ohio: Air Force Institute of Technology.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UCTAD). (2006). Trade And Development Aspects Of Logistics Services. UCTAD.
Vietnam Industry Research and Consultancy (VIRAC). (2021). Vietnam Logistics Market Report.
Vietnam Logistics Business Association (VLA). (2020). 15% of businesses lost 50% of their revenue, 50% of businesses sharply reduced the number of services over the same period.
World Bank. (2020). World Development Report 2020. World Bank Publications – Books
(此全文限內部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *