帳號:guest(3.145.191.187)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:林妤儒
作者(英文):Yu-Ju Lin
論文名稱:碳價與氣候變遷績效對海外直接投資影響之研究:污染天堂假說與波特假說觀點
論文名稱(英文):The Impacts of Carbon Price and Climate Change Performance on Foreign Direct Investment: The Perspectives of Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Porter Hypothesis
指導教授:楊國彬
指導教授(英文):Kuo-Pin Yang
口試委員:王廷升
駱少康
口試委員(英文):Timothy-Tingson Wang
Shao-Kang Lo
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學號:611033002
出版年(民國):112
畢業學年度:111
語文別:中文
論文頁數:71
關鍵詞:污染天堂假說波特假說碳價(稅)海外直接投資氣候變遷績效
關鍵詞(英文):Pollution Haven HypothesisPorter HypothesisCarbon PriceForeign Direct InvestmentClimate Change Performance
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:32
  • 收藏收藏:0
近年來為因應全球二氧化碳排放量不斷攀升的課題,課徵碳稅及碳交易兩種制度已成為世界各國控制碳排放及推動減碳的重要方式。伴隨著各國嚴厲的環境政策,世界各大企業都正面臨或將面臨碳排成本及環境標準問題,全球環境議題改變了國際競爭環境,影響海外直接投資國際資本的流向,使全球經濟結構產生重大的轉變。環境制度及成本究竟是促進還是抑制產業發展上在過去文獻中持不同的立場,污染天堂假說觀點主張廠商會逃離環境制度較嚴格的地方;波特假說則主張環境制度趨於嚴格有利於技術創新及提升競爭力,因而吸引廠商進入。基於此,本研究擬從污染天堂假說觀點及波特假說觀點,探討在碳排世代下一國碳價與氣候變遷績效對其海外直接投資之流入與流出之影響為何?同時探討兩項假說觀點之間是否存在交互作用的可能性?
本研究以2015年至2021年間作為研究期間,研究對象為已實施碳稅制度及碳交易機制之國家,最終樣本篩選出43個國家,共301筆觀察值,研究方法採用Panel Data縱橫資料迴歸分析驗證本研究之假說。結果顯示,一國碳價(稅)與該國海外直接投資流入 (Inward FDI) 呈顯著負向關係,一國氣候變遷績效與該國海外直接投資流入 (Inward FDI) 呈顯著正向關係,本研究在污染天堂假說與波特假說觀點下的碳價及氣候變遷績效與FDI之關係僅得到部分支持。一國氣候變遷績效不會弱化碳價(稅)與該國海外直接投資之關係,因此污染天堂假說與波特假說交互作用在本研究未得到支持。本研究結果具有重要理論貢獻及減碳管理的實務意涵。

關鍵詞:污染天堂假說、波特假說、碳價(稅)、海外直接投資、氣候變遷績效
In recent years, in response to rising global carbon dioxide emissions, carbon taxes and carbon trading have become two important mechanisms for controlling carbon emissions and promoting decarbonization. With the stringent environmental policies of various countries, major corporations around the world are facing or will face challenges arising from carbon costs and environmental standards. The global environmental agenda has altered the international competitive landscape, influencing the flow of international capital in FDI and leading to significant transformations in the global economic structure. Previous literature has presented different perspectives on whether environmental regulations and costs promote or hinder industrial development. The Pollution Haven Hypothesis (PHH) argues that companies are inclined to relocate away from areas with more stringent environmental regulations. The Porter Hypothesis (PH), however, asserts that stringent environmental regulations can benefit technological innovation and enhance competitiveness. Based on the two hypotheses, this study intends to test the impacts of carbon price and climate change performance on the FDI from the perspectives of the PHH and PH, in the era of emission reductions. Meanwhile, this study also tests the possible interaction between the perspectives of PHH and PH.
The timeframe of this study covers the period from 2015 to 2021 and focuses on countries that have implemented carbon taxes and carbon trading mechanisms. A total of 43 countries were selected as the final sample, resulting in 301 observations. The research methodology involves using panel data regression analysis to test the hypotheses proposed. The results indicate a significant negative relationship between carbon pricing and Inward FDI, consistent with PHH perspectives, and a significant positive relationship between climate change performance and Inward FDI, consistent with PH perspectives. Additionally, the climate change performance of a country does not weaken the relationship between carbon pricing and Inward FDI. Therefore, the interaction between PHH and PH is not supported in this study. The results of this study contribute to theory and have practical implications for carbon management.

Keywords: Pollution Haven Hypothesis, Porter Hypothesis, Carbon Price, Foreign Direct Investment, Climate Change Performance 
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 4
第三節 研究架構與流程 7
第貳章 文獻探討與假說推論 9
第一節 理論與文獻探討 9
第二節 假說推論 24
第參章 研究方法 33
第一節 研究架構 33
第二節 資料來源與研究樣本 34
第三節 變數與衡量 34
第四節 資料分析方法 40
第肆章 實證結果與討論 41
第一節 樣本描述 41
第二節 敘述統計 42
第三節 假說檢定結果 45
第四節 統計分析結果與討論 50
第伍章 研究結論與建議 53
第一節 研究結論 53
第二節 理論貢獻 54
第三節 管理意涵 56
第四節 研究限制與建議 58
參考文獻
中文部分
梁啟源,2009。因應節能減碳需求台灣需要能源多元化政策。核能簡訊,117,1-4。
陳曉紅、曾翔宇、王富強,2016。碳交易機制下碳交易價格對供應鏈碳排放的影響。系統工程理論與實踐,36(10),2562-2571。
魏國棟,2003。氣候變遷與因應經濟政策工具:文獻回顧。經濟研究,39(1),27-69。
顧瑩華、楊舒菲、盧鈺雯,2022。全球經濟情勢變遷對外人直接投資布局的影響分析。經濟部投資審議委員會。

英文部分
Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209-226.
Alliance for American Manufacturing (2008). Shedding Light on Energy Subsidies in China: An Analysis of China’s Steel Industry from 2000-2007. Washington, DC: The Alliance for American Manufacturing.
Alliance for American Manufacturing (2009). An Assessment of Environmental Regulation of the Steel Industry in China. Washington, DC: The Alliance for American Manufacturing.
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2-22.
Arimura, T., Hibiki, A., & Johnstone, N. (2007). An empirical study of environmental R&D: what encourages facilities to be environmentally innovative. Environmental Policy and Corporate Behaviour, 142-173.
Baranzini, A., Van den Bergh, J. C., Carattini, S., Howarth, R. B., Padilla, E., & Roca, J. (2017). Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(4), e462.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Blanco, L., Gonzalez, F., & Ruiz, I. (2013). The impact of FDI on CO2 emissions in Latin America. Oxford Development Studies, 41(1), 104-121.
Blomstrom, M., Lipsey, R. E., & Kulchycky, K. (1988). US and Swedish direct investment and exports. Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis, 257-302. University of Chicago Press.
Boitan, I. A., & Marchewka-Bartkowiak, K. (2022). Climate change and the pricing of sovereign debt: Insights from European markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101685.
Bongaarts, J. (1992). Population growth and global warming. Population and Development Review, 299-319.
Buckley , P. J.,& Casson , M. (1976) A Long-run Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, 32-65. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Burck, J., Hagen, U., Bals, C., Höhne, N., & Nascimento, L. (2020). CCPI Climate Change Performance Index 2021. Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute & Climate Action Network.
Camargo, J., Barcena, I., Soares, P. M., Schmidt, L., & Andaluz, J. (2020). Mind the climate policy gaps: climate change public policy and reality in Portugal, Spain and Morocco. Climatic Change, 161(1), 151-169.
Cheng, L. K., & Kwan, Y. K. (2000). What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience. Journal of International Economics, 51(2), 379-400.
Chen, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, F. (2021). Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120744.
Christainsen, G. B., & Tietenberg, T. H. (1985). Distributional and macroeconomic aspects of environmental policy. In Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, 1,345-393.
Chung, S. (2014). Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Development Economics, 108, 222-236
Chong, S. H., Tun, Y. L., & Shah, S. Z. (2022). Re-assessing pollution haven hypothesis (PHH): Corruption, FDI and CO2 emission. IOP Conference Series : Earth and Environmental Science, 1102(1), 012060
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (1994). North-South trade and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 755-787.
Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research policy, 41(1), 132-153.
D’Agostino, L. M. (2015). How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis. Economia Politica, 32, 245-269.
Dean, J. M., Lovely, M. E., & Wang, H. (2009). Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 1-13.
De Vries, F. P., & Withagen, C. (2005). Innovation and environmental stringency: the case of sulfur dioxide abatement. CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2005-18.
Denny, E., & O’Malley, M. (2009). The impact of carbon prices on generation-cycling costs. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1204-1212.
Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175-179.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147-160.
Disdier, A. C., & Mayer, T. (2004). How different is Eastern Europe? Structure and determinants of location choices by French firms in Eastern and Western Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(2), 280-296.
Dunning, J. H. (1979). Explaining changing patterns of international production: in defence of the eclectic theory. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4), 269-295.
Dunning, J. H., & Narula, R. (1995). The R&D activities of foreign firms in the United States. International Studies of Management & Organization, 25(1-2), 39-74.
Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 1-23.
Ethier, W.J. (1982). National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. The American Economic Review, 72(3), 389-405.
Franco, C., & Marin, G. (2017). The effect of within-sector, upstream and downstream environmental taxes on innovation and productivity. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(2), 261-291.
Friedlingstein, P., O'sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Gregor, L., Hauck, J., & Zheng, B. (2022). Global carbon budget 2022. Earth System Science Data, 14(11), 4811-4900.
Garsous, G., Kozluk, T., & Dlugosch, D. (2020). Do energy prices drive outward FDI? Evidence from a sample of listed firms. The Energy Journal, 41(3).
Gill, F. L., Viswanathan, K. K., & Karim, M. Z. A. (2018). The critical review of the pollution haven hypothesis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(1), 167-174.
Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. (1993). Environmental regulation and manufacturing productivity at the plant level. NBER Working Paper, 4321.
Grimes, P., & Kentor, J. (2003). Exporting the greenhouse: Foreign capital penetration and CO? Emissions 1980-1996. Journal of World-Systems Research, 9(2), 261-275.
Green, J. F. (2021). Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 043004.
Hamamoto, M. (2006). Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 28(4), 299-312.
Hasseldine, J., Salama, A. I., & Toms, J. S. (2005). Quantity versus quality: the impact of environmental disclosures on the reputations of UK Plcs. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 231-248.
Helpman, E. (1984). A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. The Journal of Political Economy, 93, 451-471.
Hu, Y., Ren, S., Wang, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China. Energy Economics, 85, 104590.
Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., & Popp, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 133-155.
Kentor, J., & Grimes, P. (2006). Foreign investment dependence and the environment: A global perspective. Globalization and the Environment, 61-77.
Kim, P., & Bae, H. (2022). Do firms respond differently to the carbon pricing by industrial sector? How and why? A comparison between manufacturing and electricity generation sectors using firm-level panel data in Korea. Energy Policy, 162, 112773.
Kneller, R., & Manderson, E. (2012). Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(2), 211-235.
Kojima, K. (1973). A macroeconomic approach to foreign direct investment. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 14(1), 1-21.
Landefeld, J. S. (2000). GDP: One of the Great Inventions of the 20th Century. Survey of Current Business, 80(1), 6-14.
Latif, N. (2022). Comprehensive environmental performance index (CEPI): an intuitive indicator to evaluate the environmental quality over time. Environmental Research Communications, 4(7), 075016.
Lee, J., Veloso, F. M., & Hounshell, D. A. (2011). Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: Evidence from patenting in the US auto industry. Research Policy, 40(9), 1240-1252.
Lim, S., & Prakash, A. (2023). Does carbon pricing spur climate innovation? A panel study, 1986-2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136459.
Luo, Y., Li, X., Qi, X., & Zhao, D. (2021). The impact of emission trading schemes on firm competitiveness: Evidence of the mediating effects of firm behaviors from the guangdong ETS. Journal of Environmental Management, 290, 112633.
Luo, Y., Guo, C., Ali, A., & Zhang, J. (2022). A dynamic analysis of the impact of FDI, on economic growth and carbon emission, evidence from China, India and Singapore. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(54), 82256-82270.
MacKellar, F. L., Lutz, W., Prinz, C., & Goujon, A. (1995). Population, households, and CO2 emissions. Population and Development Review, 849-865.
Mahadevan, R., & Sun, Y. (2020). Effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions: Evidence from China and its Belt and Road countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 276, 111321.
Markusen, J.R. (1984). Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade. Journal of International Economics, 16(3), 205-226.
Markusen, J. R., Venables, A., Konan, D. E., & Zhang, K. H. (1996). A unified treatment of horizontal direct investment, vertical direct investment, and the pattern of trade in goods and services. NBER Working Paper No. 5696.
Mandal, S. K. (2010). Do undesirable output and environmental regulation matter in energy efficiency analysis? Evidence from Indian cement industry. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6076-6083.
Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Wagner, U. J. (2016). The impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on regulated firms: what is the evidence after ten years?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 129-148.
Meyerson, F. A. (1998). Population, carbon emmissions, and global warming: The forgotten relationship at Kyoto. Population and Development Review, 115-130.
Nielsen, B. B., Asmussen, C. G., & Weatherall, C. D. (2017). The location choice of foreign direct investments: Empirical evidence and methodological challenges. Journal of World Business, 52(1), 62-82.
Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119-132.
Parent, M., Gallupe, R. B., Salisbury, W. D., & Handelman, J. M. (2000). Knowledge creation in focus groups: can group technologies help? Information & Management, 38(1), 47-58.
Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2009). Transnational linkages and the spillover of environment-efficiency into developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 375-383.
Porter, M. E. (1991). America's green strategy. Scientific American, 168.
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Qi, S., Cheng, S., & Cui, J. (2021). Environmental and economic effects of China’s carbon market pilots: Empirical evidence based on a DID model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123720.
Rassier, D. G., & Earnhart, D. (2015). Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability. Ecological Economics, 112, 129-140.
Rivers, N., & Schaufele, B. (2015). Salience of carbon taxes in the gasoline market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 74, 23-36.
Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288-300.
Scott, W. R. (1984). Environmental linkages and organizational complexity: Public and private schools. Stanford University Press.
Shadbegian, R. J., & Gray, W. B. (2003). What determines environmental performance at paper mills? The roles of abatement spending, regulation, and efficiency. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), 114.
Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106-168.
Simpson, R. D., & Bradford III, R. L. (1996). Taxing variable cost: Environmental regulation as industrial policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 282-300.
Solarin, S. A., Al-Mulali, U., Musah, I., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy, 124, 706-719.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
Stavropoulos, S., Wall, R., & Xu, Y. (2018). Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1378-1394.
Sunghoon Chung (2013). Environmental Regulation and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Development Economics, 108, 222-236.
Sylwester, K. (2001). R&D and economic growth. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 13(4), 71-84.
Tan, X., Sun, Q., Wang, M., Cheong, T. S., Shum, W. Y., & Huang, J. (2022). Assessing the effects of emissions trading systems on energy consumption and energy mix. Applied Energy, 310, 118583.
Terzi, H., & PATA, U. (2020). Is the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) valid for Turkey? Panoeconomicus, 67(1).
The World Bank (2021). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2021. World Bank.
The World Bank (2022). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022. World Bank.
Thursby, M., & Thursby, J. (2006). Here or There?: A Survey of Factors in Multinational R&D Location-Report to the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable. National Academies Press.
Van Leeuwen, G., & Mohnen, P. (2017). Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: an empirical analysis of green innovation for the Netherlands. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1-2), 63-77.
Vernon, R. (1966). International trade and international investment in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190-207.
Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Reader in Business and the Environment, 36(81), 4.
Walter, I., & Ugelow, J. L. (1979). Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio, 102-109.
Wang, Z., Zhang, B., & Zeng, H. (2016). The effect of environmental regulation on external trade: empirical evidences from Chinese economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 55-61.
Wagner, U. J., & Timmins, C. D. (2009). Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 43, 231-256.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.
Xing, Y., & Kolstad, C. D. (2002). Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment? Environmental and Resource Economics, 21, 1-22.
Yang, C. H., Tseng, Y. H., & Chen, C. P. (2012). Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(4), 514-532.
Zhang, Q., & Jiang, Y. (2016). On the relationship between foreign trade and regional disparity in China in the post-reform era. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 6(3), 50-62.
Zhou, P., Poh, K. L., & Ang, B. W. (2007). A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(1), 1-9.
Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2013). Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy policy, 57, 43.
Zhou, Z., Zhang, T., Wen, K., Zeng, H., & Chen, X. (2018). Carbon risk, cost of debt financing and the moderation effect of media attention: Evidence from Chinese companies operating in high‐carbon industries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1131-1144.











 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *