帳號:guest(18.217.243.182)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:黃上晉
作者(英文):Shang-Chin Huang
論文名稱:環保支出與碳排放對企業財務績效的影響性: 以環境法規為中介變數
論文名稱(英文):The impact of environmental expenditures and carbon emissions on corporate financial performance: The mediating variable of environmental regulations.
指導教授:洪新民
指導教授(英文):Hsin-Min Hung
口試委員:林達榮
許志堅
口試委員(英文):Tyrone T. Lin
Jyh-Jian Sheu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學號:611033003
出版年(民國):112
畢業學年度:111
語文別:中文
論文頁數:65
關鍵詞:環保支出碳排放環境法規財務績效高汙染產業
關鍵詞(英文):Environmental protection expendituresCarbon emissionsEnvironmental regulationsCorporate financial performance,High-pollution industries
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:27
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:31
  • 收藏收藏:0
隨著永續議題漸受重視,政府制定環境法規以減緩企業活動對環境造成的傷害。若企業欲將汙染排放量降低至規定標準,必須對環境投入資源,例如: 環保支出改善污染之情況。依過往研究觀點,企業的永續行為如: 環保支出與減碳措施有利於長期財務績效,對短期財務績效則有正、反不同結果。而相關研究樣本多以歐美市場與中國等相對完整或嚴苛的環境法規地區為對象。本研究依此推論,環境法規之約束能力,引導企業因此提升永續項目的投入意願。因此,本研究依過往研究及上述觀點提出五項假說探討環保支出和減碳措施對財務績效之關聯性,同時檢驗環境法規之中介效果,並另外分析高汙染產業之相關情形。
本研究以2019~2020年台灣上市(櫃)企業為研究樣本,資料來源取自臺灣經濟新報資料庫 (Taiwan Economic Journal, TEJ)、公開資訊觀測站(MOPS)與各公司年度CSR報告,經篩選後之最終樣本共1049筆觀察值,416家臺灣上市(櫃)公司。本研究先以敘述性統計說明與相關性分析樣本分布情形。後以迴歸分析(Regression)驗證本研究之假說。結果發現,環保支出對長期財務績效為顯著正相關,短期財務績效為正相關,未達顯著;碳排變化率則對財務績效為正相關,未達顯著;環境法規對短期財務績效則顯著為負相關。本研究與過往研究實證僅部份支持,研究發現環境法規相對歐盟等寬鬆的台灣,企業環保支出對財務績效仍為正相關,且高汙染產業更為顯著,企業環保支出意願不完全因法規約束受限。本研究之發現供未來研究新觀點,提供企業投入永續行為層面與政府制定環境法規上之參考價值。
With the increasing attention to sustainability issues, governments have been implementing environmental regulations to mitigate the harm caused by business activities to the environment. In order to reduce pollutant emissions to the prescribed standards, companies must allocate resources to environmental efforts, such as investing in pollution control measures. According to previous research, sustainable practices by companies, such as environmental expenditures and carbon reduction measures, are beneficial for long-term financial performance, but the results vary for short-term financial performance. Most of the related studies have focused on the European and American markets or regions with relatively comprehensive or stringent environmental regulations, such as China. Based on this inference, the binding power of environmental regulations encourages companies to increase their investment in sustainable initiatives. Therefore, this study proposes five hypotheses based on previous research and the aforementioned viewpoints to explore the relationship between environmental expenditures, carbon reduction measures, and financial performance. It also examines the mediating effect of environmental regulations and analyzes the situation in high-pollution industries separately.
This study uses data from Taiwan-listed companies from 2019 to 2020 as the research sample. The data is sourced from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) database, the Market Observation Post System (MOPS), and annual CSR reports of various companies. After screening, the final sample consists of 1,049 observations from 416 Taiwan-listed companies. The study begins with descriptive statistics and correlation analysis to illustrate the sample distribution. Then, regression analysis is conducted to test the hypotheses. The results show that environmental expenditures have a significantly positive correlation with long-term financial performance and a positive correlation with short-term financial performance, but not significant. Carbon emission changes have a positive correlation with financial performance, but not significant. Environmental regulations have a significant negative correlation with short-term financial performance. The empirical findings of this study partially support previous research. The study finds that in Taiwan, where environmental regulations are relatively lenient compared to the European Union, environmental expenditures by companies still have a positive correlation with financial performance, particularly in high-pollution industries. The willingness of companies to invest in environmental efforts is not solely restricted by regulatory constraints. The findings of this study provide new perspectives for future research and offer valuable insights for companies engaging in sustainable practices and governments formulating environmental regulations.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 5
第二章 文獻回顧與假說發展 9
第一節 企業社會責任 9
第二節 環保支出 11
第三節 碳排放 13
第四節 環境法規 18
第五節 假說發展 20
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究架構 27
第二節 研究樣本與資料來源 27
第三節 研究變數與衡量 28
第四節 研究分析方法 32
第四章 實證結果與討論 33
第一節 研究樣本 33
第二節 敘述性統計 34
第三節 相關性分析 35
第三節 迴歸分析與假說驗證 40
第四節 研究結果之討論 49
第五章 研究結論與建議 53
第一節 研究結論 53
第二節 研究貢獻 54
第三節 研究限制與建議 56
參考文獻 57
中文部分 57
英文部分 57




中文部分

高明瑞、劉常勇、黃義俊與張乃仁(2010)。企業綠色管理,、環境績效與競爭優勢關聯性之研究。管理與系統,17(2),255-278。

朱博湧 (2012)。綠金企業-從IT 到ET, 開創新藍海。天下遠見。

朱博湧、林裕凌與吳宗沛 (2015)。歐美企業綠色績效與經營績效之關聯性研究。商略學報,7(3),171-186。

呂冠霖與李育明 (2020)。企業溫室氣體管理績效碳討與盤查標準改版研析。臺灣能源期刊,7(2),181-195。

張育琳 (2016)。碳排放量、綠化投資策略與公司續效。管理與系統,23 (2),197- 222。

英文部分

Adams, C.A. & Kuasirikun, N. (2000). A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies. European Accounting Review, 9, 53–79.

Aguilera-Caracuel, J & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2013). Green innovation and financial performance: an institutional approach. Organization & Environment, 26(4), 365–385.

Akbar, A., Xinfeng Jiang., Qureshi, M, A., Akbar, M. (2021). Does corporate environmental investment impede financial performance of Chinese enterprises? The moderating role of financial constraints. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 58007–58017.

Alam, M, S., Muhammad, A., Chu, C, C., Ugur, S. (2019). Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries. Energy Economics, 78, 401-411.

Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.

Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., Hasan, I., Kobeissi, N. (2012). Journal of Business Research, 65, 1628–1635.

Beccaria, C. (2009). On crimes and punishments and other writings. University of Toronto Press.

Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Brothers.

Busch, T., Bassen, A., Lewandowski, S., & Sump, F. (2020). Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance Revisited. Organization & Environment, 35(1), 154–171.

Busch T., Hoffmann VH. (2011). How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Business & Society, 50(2), 233–265.

Brouwers, R., Schoubben, F., Van Hulle, C. (2018). The influence of carbon cost pass through on the link between carbon emission and corporate financial performance in the context of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1422-1436.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), 497-505.

Chen, L. H., Zhuo, Y., Xu, Z., Xu, X., Gao, X. (2019). Is Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emission an Important Factor Affecting Healthcare Expenditure? Evidence from China, 2005–2016. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 3995.

Cho, C. H., Freedman, M., Patten, D. M. (2012). Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures: A test of alternative theories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25, 486–507.

Clemens, B. (2006). Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green? Journal of Business Research, 59, 492 – 500.

Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 42-56.

Cordova, C., Zorio-Grima, A., & Merello, P. (2021). Contextual and corporate governance effects on carbon accounting and carbon performance in emerging economies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 536-550.

Cortez, M.C., Andrade, N., Silva, F. (2022). The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence. Ecological Economics, 197, 107427.

Darnall, N., Henriques, I., Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size: Environmental Strategy, Stakeholders, and Size. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1072–1094.

Delmas, M. A., Nairn-Birch, N., & Lim, J. (2015). Dynamics of environmental and financial performance: The case of greenhouse gas emissions. Organization & Environment, 28 (4), 374-393.

Du, M., Chai, S, L., Li, S., Sun, Z, J. (2022). How Environmental Regulation Affects Green Investment of Heavily Polluting Enterprises: Evidence from Steel and Chemical Industries in China. Sustainability, 14, 11971.

Elsayih, J., Datt, R., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate governance and carbon emissions performance: empirical evidence from Australia. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 28 (4), 433-459.

Filbeck, G & Gorman, R. F. (2004). The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 29, 137–157.

Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A. and Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85– 106.

Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2, 54-61.

Friede, G., Busch, T., Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210–233.

Gallego-Alvarez, I., Segura, L., Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2014). Carbon emission reduction: The impact on the financial and operational performance of international companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, xxx, 1-11.

Griffiths A, Haigh N, Rassias J. 2007. A framework for understanding institutional governance systems and climate change: The case of Australia. European Management Journal, 25(6), 415–427.

Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J., Koedijk, K. (2011). The economic value of corporate ecoefficiency. European Financial Management, 17(4), 679–704 .

Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 198-113.

Haque, Faizul; Ntim, Collins G. (2022). Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, Chichester, 31(7), 3318-3334.

Hart, S. L & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30–37.

Hassel, L., Nilsson, H., Nyquist, S. (2005). The value relevance of environmental performance. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 41-61.

Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (1), 87-99.

Jacobs, B. W., Singhal, V. R., Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 430–441.

Jaggi, B & Freedman, M. (1992). An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19(5), 697-713.

Jaggi, B., Allini, A., Macchioni, R., & Zampella, A. (2018). Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 50, 1031-1056.

Jiang, K., & Teng, Y. (2014). Analysis of the Impact of China’s Environmental Regulation on Industrial Technology Innovation——Based on Panel Data Analysis of China’s 20 Pollution-intensive Industries [J]. Ecological Economy, 30(6), 90-93.

Johnson, H. L. (1971). Business in contemporary society: Framework and issues. (No Title).

Kedia, S., Koh, K., & Rajgopal, S. (2015). Evidence on contagion in earnings management. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2337-2373.

Konar, S & Cohen, M, A. (2001). Does the Market Value Environmental Performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 281–289.

Lewandowski, S. (2017). Corporate carbon and financial performance: The role of emission reductions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26 (8), 1196-1211.

Liao, L., Du, M., Chen, Z. (2021). Air pollution, health care use and medical costs: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 95, 105132.

Liu, L., Zhao, Z., Zhang, M., Zhou, C., Zhou, D. (2021). The effects of environmental regulation on outward foreign direct investment’s reverse green technology spillover: Crowding out or facilitation? Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, 124689.

Ma, M. (2017). Economic links and the spillover effect of earnings quality on market risk. The Accounting Review, 92(6), 213-245.

McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Misani, N & Pogutz, S. (2015). Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: A non-linear approach. Ecological Economics, 109, 150–160.

Muganyi, T., Yan, L., Sun, H, P. (2021). Green finance, fintech and environmental protection: Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 7, 100-107.

Porter, M. E., Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

Porter, M. E. & Linde, C. V. D. (1999). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Journal of business administration and policy analysis, 215.

Qian, W., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 365–379.

Rassier, D. G., & Earnhart, D. (2010). Does the porter hypothesis explain expected future financial performance? The effect of clean water regulation on chemical manufacturing firms. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 353-377.

Rout, C., Paul, A., Kumar, R. S., Chakraborty, D., & Goswami, A. (2020). Cooperative sustainable supply chain for deteriorating item and imperfect production under different carbon emission regulations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122-170.

Sariannidis, N., Zafeiriou, E., Giannarakis, G., & Arabatzis, G. (2013). CO2 Emissions and Financial Performance of Socially Responsible Firms: An Empirical Survey. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 109–120.

Shimshack, J. P., & Ward, M. B. (2008). Enforcement and over-compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(1), 90-105.

Silva-Gao, L. (2012). The Disclosure of Environmental Capital Expenditures: Evidence from the Electric Utility Sector in the USA. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 240-252.

Song H, Zhao C, Zeng J. (2017). Can environmental management improve financial performance: an empirical study of A-shares listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1051-1056.

Surroca, J., Tribó, JA., Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 463–490.

Tang, Y., Yue, S., Ma, W., Zhang, L. (2022). How do environmental protection expenditure and green technology innovation affect synergistically the nancial performance of heavy polluting enterprises: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 89597–89613.

Van Emous, R., Krušinskas, R., Westerman, W. (2021). Carbon Emissions Reduction and Corporate Financial Performance: The Influence of Country-Level Characteristics. Energies, 14(19), 6029.

Walton, C. C. (1967). Corporate social responsibilities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Wang, L., Li, S., Gao, S. (2014). Do Greenhouse Gas Emissions Affect Financial Performance? – an Empirical Examination of Australian Public Firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 505–519.

Wang, Y., Li, Y., Ma, Z., & Song, J. (2019). The deterrence effect of a penalty for environmental violation. Sustainability, 11(15), 4226.

Wang, T & Chen, Y. (2022). Environmental legislation and capitalization of corporate environmental expenditure: Evidence from China. PLoS ONE, 17(11).

Wang, R., Wijen, F., & Heugens, P. P. (2018). Government's green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 403-428.

Wright, C & Nyberg, D (2017). An Inconvenient Truth: How Organizations Translate Climate Change into Business as Usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1633–1661.

Xu, Q., Lei, Y., Ge, J., Ma, X. (2017). Did investment become green in China? Evidence from a sectoral panel analysis from 2003 to 2012. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 500–506.

Yang, M., Bento, P., Akbar, A. (2019). Does CSR influence firm performance indicators? Evidence from Chinese pharmaceutical enterprises. Sustainability, 11, 5656.

Yeow, K. E., & Ng, S.-H. (2021). The impact of green bonds on corporate environmental and financial performance. Managerial Finance, 47 (10).

Yu, W & Zheng, Y. (2020). The disclosure of corporate social responsibility reports and sales performance in China. Accounting & finance, 60(2), 1239-1270.

Zhang, S., Lundgren, T., & Zhou, W. (2015). Environmental investment and firm performance: A panel VAR approach. Available at SSRN, 2687978.

Ziegler, A., Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2009). Corporate responses to climate change and financial performance: The impact of climate policy. CER-ETH-Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich, Working paper, (09/105).

Zhang, Q., Yu, Z., Kong, D. (2019). The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98, 102254.

Zhao, H. (2007). The impact of environmental regulations on China's industrial technological innovation. Economic Management, 21, 57-61.

Zhou, H., & Yin, H. (2018). Stock market reactions to environmental disclosures: new evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters, 25(13), 910-913.

Zhou, B., Wu, J., Guo, S., Hu, M., & Wang, J. (2020). Environmental regulation and financial performance of Chinese listed companies. PLoS One, 15(12), e0244083.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *