帳號:guest(3.145.104.137)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:蔡伊庭
作者(英文):E-Ting Tsai
論文名稱:反資本弱化條款與公司關係人融資決策之關聯
論文名稱(英文):The Association between Anti-Thin Capitalization Rule and Corporate Financing Decisions through Related Parties
指導教授:黃德芬
指導教授(英文):De-Fen Huang
口試委員:王肇蘭
簡雪芳
口試委員(英文):Chao-Lan Wang
Hsueh-Fang Chien
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學號:611034002
出版年(民國):111
畢業學年度:110
語文別:中文
論文頁數:60
關鍵詞:反資本弱化融資決策法定稅率關係人負債
關鍵詞(英文):Anti-Thin Capitalizationfinancing decisionstatutory tax ratesrelated party debt
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:9
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:1
  • 收藏收藏:0
我國於2011年正式增訂所得稅法第43-2條,即反資本弱化條款,目的為防止企業使用過多之關係人舉債融資獲取利息產生之稅盾效果進而規避稅賦。條款實施至今已逾10年,本文研究反資本弱化條款與公司關係人融資決策之關聯,並加以探討法定稅率對公司關係人融資決策之影響。研究結果顯示法定稅率對關係人負債占股東權益比率有正向顯著之影響,反資本弱化條款及法定稅率與反資本弱化條款之交乘項對關係人負債占股東權益比率則無顯著影響,實證結果支持本研究預期。換言之,反資本弱化條款之實施對關係人舉債融資決策無實質效果,其原因在於條款規定之比例限制可能過於寬鬆且不容易違背門檻,顯示反資本弱化條款可能要制定更為嚴格才能發揮影響。
In 2011, Taiwan officially updated Article 43-2 of the Income Tax Law, which is called the Anti-Thin Capitalization rule in this article. The purpose of this rule is to prevent enterprises from using excessive debt financing of related parties to obtain the tax shield effect of interest and tax avoidance. This rule has been implemented for more than 10 years. Therefore, this paper investigates the association between Anti-Thin capitalization rule and corporate financing decisions through related parties, and to explore the association between statutory tax rates and corporate financing decisions through related parties. Empirical results show that the statutory tax rate has a positive and significant impact on the ratio of related party's debt to shareholders' equity. The Anti-Thin Capitalization rule and the interaction of statutory tax rate and anti-thin capitalization rule has no significant impact on the ratio of related party’s debt to shareholders’ equity. The empirical results support the expectations of this study. In summary, The implementation of the Anti-Thin Capitalization rule has no obvious effect on the ratio of related party's debt to shareholders' equity. The reason is that the proportion restrictions stipulated in the terms may be too loose and it is not easy to reach the threshold, indicating that the anti-thin capitalization rule may have to be formulated more rigorously to provide a greater effect on corporate financing decisions through related parties.
摘要 I
Abstract II
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 台灣營利事業所得稅法 5
第二節 反資本弱化 8
第三節 資本結構理論 16
第三章 研究假說與研究設計 21
第一節 研究假說 21
第二節 實證模型 24
第三節 資料來源及樣本選取 29
第四章 實證結果與分析 31
第一節 敘述性統計 31
第二節 相關係數分析 37
第三節 實證結果分析 40
第四節 敏感性分析 46
第五章 結論與建議 53
第一節 研究結論及貢獻 53
第二節 研究限制 54
第二節 研究建議 54
參考文獻 57
一、中文文獻 57
二、英文文獻 58

一、中文文獻
尤瓊婉,2009,我國企業從事資本弱化避稅行為之實證研究,東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
王雅琴,2009,企業資本結構與融資行為之關聯性,成功大學企業管理學系博士班論文。
李顯峰與蘇建榮,2007,我國建立稀釋資本課稅制度之研究,財政部賦稅署96年度委託研究計畫。
汪瑞芝,2013,中國反資本弱化條款對臺商融資決策之影響,會計審計論叢,第 3 卷第 2 期,81-125。
汪瑞芝與陳明進,2007,兩稅合一前後上市公司融資決策之實證研究,交大管理學報,第27卷,第1期,221-246。
張婷盈,2012,比較多國籍與本國公司之資本結構決定因素-以臺灣與南韓為例,逢甲大學國際貿易所碩士論文。
陳威辰,2015,我國實施資本弱化條款對關聯企業內部融資決策影響之實證分析-以上市、上櫃及興櫃公司為例,東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
陳寶盛,2015,台灣企業低度財務槓桿決定因素研究,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
黃美祝與汪瑞芝,2015,企業避稅對負債水準之影響,會計審計論叢,第5卷第2期(12月):1-32。
溫嘉琪,2010,跨國企業資本弱化與企業價值關係之研究-以高科技產業為例,逢甲大學會計研究所碩士論文。
詹錦宏與張文榮,2009,有拗折點的融資順位模型--台灣地區上市公司資本結構之實證研究,會計學報,第1卷第2期,37-61。
劉維琪,劉玉珍,1989,融資順位理論之發展與實證,管理評論,第八卷,7-22。
鄭明輝,2004,企業資本結構影響因素與公司價值關係之實證研究-以臺灣上市公司為例,成功大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文。
二、英文文獻
Allen, D. E., and H. Mizuno. 1989. The determinants of corporate capital structure: Japanese evidence. Applied Economics 21 (5): 569-585.
Bhaduri, S. 2002 Determinants of Capital Structure Choice: A Study of the Indian Corporate Sector. Applied Financial Economics 12, 655-665.
Booth, L., V. Aivazian, A. Demirguc-Kunt, and V. Maksimovic. 2001. Capital structures in developing countries. The Journal of Finance 56 (1): 87-130.
Brocke, K., and E. Perez. 2009. Group financing: From thin capitalization to interest deduction limitation rules. International Transfer Pricing Journal 16 (1): 29-35.
Buettner, T., M. Overesch, U. Schreiber, and G. Wamser. 2009. Taxation and capital structure choice—Evidence from a panel of German multinationals. Economics Letters, 105(3), 309-311.
Buettner, T., M. Overesch, U. Schreiber, and G. Wamser. 2012. The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the capital structure of multinational firms. Journal of Public Economics 96 (11-12): 930-938.
Burman, L., K. Clausing, and J. O’Hare. 1994. Tax reform and realizations of capital gains in 1986.National Tax Journal 47 (1): 1-18.
Chan, C. 2004. Testing Static Tradeoff Against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure in Taiwan. The Annuals of Japanese Society for the Economics Studies of Securities 39: 1-17.
Chang, R. P., and S. G. Rhee. 1990. The impact of personal taxes on corporate dividend policy and capital structure decisions. Financial Management 19 (2): 21-31.
DeAngelo, H., and R. W. Masulis. 1980. Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics 8 (1): 3-29.
Desai, M., C. Foley, and J. Hines Jr. 2004. A multinational perspective on capital structure choice and internal capital markets. The Journal of Finance 59 (6): 2451-2487.
Froot, K. A., and J. R. Hines Jr. 1995. Interest allocation rules, financing patterns, and the operation ofU.S. multinationals. In The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations, 277-307. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fuest, C., and T. Hemmelgarn. 2005. Corporate tax policy, foreign firm ownership and thin capitalization. Regional Science and Urban Economics 35 (5): 508-526.
Graham, John R. 2000. How big are the tax benefits of debt? The Journal of Finance 55 (5):1901-1941.
Grubert, H. 1998. Taxes and the division of foreign operating income among royalties, interest, dividends and retained earnings. Journal of Public Economics 68 (2): 269-290.
Hines, Jr. J. R., and R. G. Hubbard. 1990. Coming home to America: Dividend repatriations by U.S. multinationals. In Taxation in the Global Economy, edited by A. Razin, and J. Slemrod, 161-200.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Masulis, R. W. 1980. The Effects of Capital Structure Change on Security Prices: A Study of Exchange Offers. Journal of Financial Economics 8(2):139-178.
Miller, M. H. 1977. Debt and taxes. The Journal of Finance 32 (2): 261-275.
Mintz, J., and A. Weichenrieder. 2005. Taxation and the financial structure of German outbound FDI. CESifo Working paper 1612, Munich.
Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review 48 (3): 261-297.
Myers, S. C. 1984. The Capital Structure Puzzle. Journal of Finance 39(3):575-592.
OECD. 1987. Thin-capitalization and taxation of entertainers, artistes and sportsmen. Committee on Fiscal Affairs. Issues in International Taxation No.2, Paris.
OECD. 2013a. Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD. 2013b. Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Omer, T. C., and W. D. Terando. 1999. The effect of risk and tax differences on corporate and limited partnership capital structure. National Tax Journal 52 (4): 699-715.
Overesch, M., and G. Wamser. 2006. German inbound investment, corporate tax planning, and thin-capitalization rules: A difference-in-differences approach. Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 06-075.
Richardson, G., and R. Lanis. 2007. Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26 (6):689-704.
Rutterford, J. 1996. Discussion of convertible debt financing: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 23 (2): 335-338.
Sanjay, G.,and K. Newberry. 1997. Determinants of the variability on corporate effective tax rates: evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16 (1):1-34.
Schulman, C. T., D. W. Thomas, K. F. Sellers, and D. B. Kennedy. 1996. Effects of tax integration and capital gains tax on corporate leverage. National Tax Journal 49 (1): 31-54.
Scott, Jr., D. F. 1972. Evidence on the importance of financial structure. Financial Management 1 (2):45-50.
Shieh, W. S., J. N. Ou, and J. C. Wang. 2014. The Impact of Anti-Thin Capitalization Rules on Capital Structure in Taiwan. International Journal of Economics and Finance 6(11):142-159.
Stiglitz, J. 1972. Some aspects of the pure theory of corporate finance: Bankruptcies and take-overs. Bell Journal of Economics 3 (2): 458-482.
Titman, S. 1984. The effect of capital structure on a firm’s liquidation decision. Journal of Financial Economics 13 (1): 137-151.
Titman, S., and R. Wessels. 1988. The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance 43.
Wakara, N., Jumanne, M., and M. A. Chibona. 2020. The Effect of Financing Decision on Firm Performance (A Case of Tanzania). International Journal of African and Asian Studies 60(1):35-42.
Wald, J. K. 1999. How firm characteristics affect capital structure: An international comparison. The Journal of Financial Research 22 (2): 161-187.
(此全文20250607後開放外部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *