帳號:guest(18.118.120.225)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:周昕彥
作者(英文):Shin-Yen Chou
論文名稱:公司治理對企業財務經營績效的影響-以0050、0056之成分股為例
論文名稱(英文):Corporate Governance and Firm Financial Performance-Evidence from Taiwan ETF 0050 and ETF 0056
指導教授:蔣念祖
指導教授(英文):Nien-Tsu Chiang
口試委員:侯介澤
方元沂
口試委員(英文):Chieh-Tse Hou
Yuan-Yi Fang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學號:611036012
出版年(民國):112
畢業學年度:111
語文別:中文
論文頁數:50
關鍵詞:公司治理企業財務經營績效ESG 永續報告書第三方驗證
關鍵詞(英文):Corporate GovernanceFirm Financial PerformanceESG reportThird-party verification
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
元大台灣卓越50證券投資信託基金(0050)及元大寶來台灣高股息基金(0056) 是近幾年來國人普遍投資及討論的兩檔ETF。本篇研究選擇以現今2023年6月為止 之0050及0056的成分股來當作案例探討,主要也是想看,因為這兩檔ETF所選定 的公司大多都是國內股票市值較大的企業,看這些大企業是否有作好目前我國「公司治理」相關規範的遵守。本研究以2012至2022年期間0050及0056所選定之 成分股扣除重複之選定公司(以2023年5月截止之成分股公司83間)為樣本,總樣本數913筆進行研究。以資產報酬率(ROA)、股東權益報酬率(ROE)、營業利潤率(ROS)、本益比(P/E Ratio)、托賓Q值(TOBIN’S Q)為應變數,以「公司治理」3.0-永續發展藍圖的五大主軸為自變數(獨立董事席次、董事會成員性別多元性、有第三方驗證、有英文版永續報告書、有揭露永續報告書以及強制揭露永續報告書)是否有正向影響。本文實證研究顯示:
1. 獨立董事席次對公司財務經營績效ROE、ROS、TOBIN’S Q呈現正向顯著關係,在P/E Ratio呈現負向顯著。
2. 女性董事比例與公司財務經營績效皆呈現負相關。
3. 取得第三方驗證皆呈現負相關尤其是對ROS呈顯著負相關
4. 編製英文版永續報告書對財務經營績效ROS呈顯著正向關係,對其他應變數為負相關。
5. 揭露永續報告書除對ROE為正相關外,其餘皆為負相關。
6. 強制揭露永續報告書對ROS呈正向顯著關係。
綜上,雖然「公司治理」3.0多數重要具體措施對企業財務經營績效多呈現負向表現,但仍應持續推動,讓公司相關資訊更加透明化,以提升投資人的信心。

關鍵字:公司治理;企業財務經營績效;ESG 永續報告書;第三方驗證
The Yuanta Taiwan Top 50 ETF (0050) and Yuanta BaoTaiwan High Dividend ETF
(0056) have been popular investment options and subjects of discussion among
Taiwanese investors in recent years. This study aims to explore the compliance of the
constituent companies in the 0050 and 0056 ETFs, which mainly consist of large
domestic companies, with the current corporate governance standards in Taiwan. The
study uses the constituents of the 0050 and 0056 ETFs as of June 2023 as the sample,
with a total of 913 observations obtained after excluding duplicate companies (83
companies in total) from the period of 2012 to 2022. The study examines the impact of
the five major dimensions of corporate governance 3.0 - the blueprint for sustainable
development - as independent variables on various dependent variables, including return
on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), return on sales (ROS), price-to-earnings ratio
(P/E Ratio), and Tobin's Q ratio (TOBIN'S Q). These dimensions include the presence
of independent directors, gender diversity on the board, third-party verification, the
availability of an English version of the sustainability report, the disclosure of the
sustainability report, and mandatory disclosure of the sustainability report..
The empirical findings of this study are as follows:
1.The presence of independent directors shows a positive and significant relationship
with financial performance indicators such as ROE, ROS, and TOBIN'S Q, but a
negative and significant relationship with P/E Ratio.
2.The proportion of female directors is negatively correlated with financial performance
indicators.
3.The presence of third-party verification is negatively correlated, particularly with
ROS.
4.The availability of an English version of the sustainability report shows a significant
positive relationship with ROS but a negative relationship with other variables.
5.The disclosure of the sustainability report, except for ROE, is negatively correlated
with the variables.
6.Mandatory disclosure of the sustainability report exhibits a positive and significant
relationship with ROS.
In summary, although many important measures of corporate governance 3.0 show a
negative impact on financial performance, it is crucial to continue promoting these
measures to enhance transparency and investor confidence in companies.

Keyword: Corporate Governance, Firm Financial Performance, ESG report, Third-party
verification
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究架構與流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 「公司治理」的定義 7
第二節 「公司治理」對企業財務績效的影響 10
第三章 研究假說與研究方法 15
第一節 假說建立 15
第二節 資料選取範圍及資料來源 18
第三節 研究變數定義 19
第四節 回歸模型建立 25
第四章 實證分析與結果 27
第一節 敘述性統計分析 27
第二節 相關性分析 31
第三節 數據分析結果 33
第五章 結論與建議 41
第一節 研究結論 41
第二節 研究限制與建議 42
參考文獻 45
中文部分 45
英文部分 46
網站部分 50
中文文獻:

沈中華、張元,(2008),企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎? -以英國 FTSE 社會責任指數為例,經濟論文,第 36 卷第 3 期:339-385。

李馨蘋、陳治豪、程心瑤,(2015),公司策略與公司績效之研究-公司治理之調節效果,中華管理評論國際學報,第 18 卷第 1 期:1-24。

李馨蘋、莊宗憲,(2007),公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究,東吳經濟商學學報,第 57 期:1-27。

林宛瑩、許崇源(2008)。台灣集團企業之控股型態及「公司治理」衡量指標之研究與建議。交大管理學報,28(1),269-312。

林俊傑、劉梧柏、黃華瑋 (2017)。公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討:以台灣上市櫃企業「公司治理」評鑑為例。商略學報,10(1),23- 46。

吳東憲、蕭子誼、曾彩薇,(2016),內部控制缺失對經營績效之影響:以公司治理為調節效果,會計與「公司治理」,第 11 卷第 1 期:1-25。

高蘭芬、盧正壽、黃冠智、陳安琳 (2012)。公司治理、公司績效與投資策略。中山管理評論,20(3),851-880。

陳美華、洪世炳(2005)。公司治理、股權結構與公司績效關係之實證研究。企業管理學報,65,129-153。

黃詩婷 (2022)。推動公司治理3.0-永續發展藍圖對企業經營績效之影響 -以台灣上市櫃電子業為例。淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。

葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩(2002)。公司治理與評等系統。商智文化。

張元、王筱瑩,(2016),董事會及高階管理階層的性別多樣性與企業社會責任的關聯,亞太經濟管理評論,第 20 卷第 1 期:1-44。

廖芝嫻、王大維 (2015)。再探公司治理對經營績效與財務報導品質之影響: 因素分析與類神經網路之應用。中華會計學刊,11(2),169-201。

龔邑達、魏乃捷、林明宏 (2021)。公司治理評鑑對資訊不對稱與經營績效 之影響-以台灣高科技產業上市櫃公司為例。政策與人力管理,12(1),31- 50。

英文文獻:

Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 31(3), 377-397.

Aguilera, R. V (2005) , “ Corporate Governance and Director Accountability: an Institutional Comparative Perspective ,” British Journal of anagement, Vol.16,No.1 pp.39-53.


Allen, F., Carletti, E., & Marquez, R. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism,
corporate governance and firm value. Univ.-Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main.

Berle, A. and Means, G.(1932) 《The Modern Corporation and Private
Property》

Black, B. (2001). The corporate governance behavior and market value of Russian firms. Emerging markets review, 2(2), 89-108.

Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

Campbell, K. and A. Mínguez-Vera. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 83: 435- 451.

Catalyst Inc. (2004). The Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity. New York, NY.

Chen, C. J., & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association between independent nonexecutive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(4-5), 285-310.

Chen, Y. R., and Ho, C. Y. (2009). The impact of family control and board characteristics on corporate policies, Journal of Management 26 (1): 1-16.

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The journal of finance, 57(6), 2741-2771.

Demsetz, M. and K. Lehn. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causesand consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 (6): 1155-1177.

Erhardt, N. L., J. D. Werbel, and C. B. Shrader. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Perspective 11: 102-111.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.

Forker, J. J. (1992).Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research, 22(86), 111-124.

Geoffrey, Algorithmic Transparency Institute, (2022). Three Shades of Green(washing)

Ghatak, A., & Tiwari, S. C. (2021). Evaluating the Impact of Corporate Governance Determinants on Risk and Profitability of Indian Firms. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 20(3), 44-75.

Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(1), 107-156.

Hitt, M. A. and D. L. Smart. (1994). Debt: A disciplining force for managers or a debilitating force for organizations? Journal of Management Inquiry 3: 144-152.

Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.

Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 640-655.

Joh, S. W. (2003). Corporate governance and firm profitability: evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of financial Economics, 68(2), 287-322.

KHANIFAH, K., HARDININGSIH, P., DARMARYANTIKO, A., IRYANTIK, I., & Udin, U. (2020). The effect of corporate governance disclosure on banking performance: Empirical evidence from Iran, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(3), 41-51.

Konrad, A. M., and V. W. Kramer. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review 84: 22.

Mahrani, M., & Soewarno, N. (2018). The effect of good corporate governance mechanism and corporate social responsibility on financial performance with earnings management as mediating variable. Asian Journal of Accounting Research.

McKinsey & Company,(2000). Investor Opinion Survey

Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial economics, 20, 293-315.

Nielsen, S., and M. Huse. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review 18: 136-148.

OECD (2004), OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris: OECD

Oncioiu, I., Popescu, D.-M., Aviana, A. E., Șerban, A., Rotaru, F., Petrescu, M., & Marin-Pantelescu, A. (2020). The role of environmental, social, and governance disclosure in financial transparency. Sustainability, 12(17), 6757.

Patton, A. and Baker, J. (1987). Why do not directors rock the boat?. Harvard Business Review, 65, 10-12.

Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74, 61–78.

Prakash, A. & Hart, J. A. (2000) , “ Indicators of economic integration ,”Global Governance, Vol.6, No.1, pp.95-114.

Rahayu, S. A. (2021). The Effect Of Good Corporate Governance On The Profitability Of Manufacturing Companies Listed On The Indonesia Stock Exchange 2016-2020. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(3). 2195-2207.

Rosener, J. B. (2003). Women on corporate boards make good business sense. Directorship 29: 7-11.

Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175-191.

Roudaki, J. (2018). Corporate governance structures and firm performance in large agriculture companies in New Zealand. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,18(5), 987-1006.

Ryan, L., Bechholtz, A. K. & Kolb, R. W. (2010) , “ New Directions in Corporate Governance and Finance: Implications for Business Ethics Research ,” Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 20, No.4, pp.673-694.

Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, Vol.52 No.2, pp. 737-783.

《The Investment Company Act of 1940》

Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. M. & Arenas, D. (2009). Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness, Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 57-69

Vintila, G. & Gherghina, S. C. (2012) , “An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Ratings and isted Companies’ Performance ,”International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 7, No.22, pp.46.

Xu, X., & Wang, Y. (1999). Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies. China economic Review, 10(1), 75-98

網站部分

公開資訊觀測站 - TWSE 臺灣證券交易所

元大投信 ETF 專區
(此全文20280715後開放外部瀏覽)
01.pdf
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *