帳號:guest(18.226.163.229)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者:吳伯龍
作者(英文):Bo-Long Wu
論文名稱:體育課三向度教師自主支持量表中文化與信效度檢驗
論文名稱(英文):Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of Multi-Dimensional Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Physical Education Setting
指導教授:徐偉庭
指導教授(英文):Wei-Ting Hsu
口試委員:葉允棋
尚憶薇
口試委員(英文):Yun-Ci Ye
I-Wei Shang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:體育與運動科學系
學號:611189003
出版年(民國):112
畢業學年度:111
語文別:中文
論文頁數:76
關鍵詞:自我決定理論自主支持體育課學生
關鍵詞(英文):self-determination theoryautonomy supportPE students
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:6
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:4
  • 收藏收藏:0
教師自主支持是提升學生內在動機的重要條件之一 (Reeve, 2009) ,教師該怎麼做才能有效提高體育課學生的自主動機,是大家所關注的議題。然而,過去的教師自主支持研究工具僅能檢測出認知性自主支持構面,根據Stefanou等 (2004) 的說法,教師自主支持包含認知性、程序性與組織性自主支持,後續Tilga, Hein與Koka (2017) 以此為架構開發了體育課三向度教師自主支持量表 (MD-PASS-PE) 。目的:以Tilga等 (2017) 所開發的MD-PASS-PE為基礎,檢測中文化MD-PASS-PE是否具有理想的信度與效度。方法:本研究分成三階段進行,階段一進行中文化專家效度檢驗;階段二以346名國高中生 (平均年齡14.94±1.42) 為研究對象,進行量表模型檢驗;階段三以291名國高中生 (平均年齡15.66±1.46) 為研究對象,進行恆等性與效標檢驗。結果:第一階段通過專家內容效度檢驗;第二階段通過內部一致性、驗證性因素分析、聚斂效度與區別效度;第三階段重複檢驗了量表模型,兩階段樣本間具有不變性,但是性別不變性未通過標準,中文化MD-PASS-PE與基本心理需求滿足以及努力的各構面間皆具有顯著正相關。結論:中文化MD-PASS-PE具有理想的信度與效度,可用於量測學生對於教師自主支持行為的感受,未來教師可根據量表檢驗結果設計具體化的教學策略,增進學生自主動機及營造正向課堂體驗;未來研究方面,應再針對量表進行複核效度檢驗,亦可檢驗此量表於不同年齡或是不同情境的適用性。
It is proven that teachers' autonomy support can enhance students' intrinsic motivation (Reeve, 2009). and how teachers can effectively improve students' autonomous motivation in physical education has been one of the heated topics. The existing scales for teachers' autonomy support can only measure cognitive autonomy support Stefanou et al., (2004) suggested, that teachers’ autonomy support can be categorized as cognitive autonomy support, organizational autonomy support, and procedural autonomy support. The Multi-Dimensional Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Physical Education (MD-PASS-PE) based on cognitive autonomy support, organizational autonomy support, and procedural autonomy support was developed by Tilga et al., (2017). Purpose: This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Chinese MD-PASS-PE. Methods: The study was carried out in three phases. In phase 1, expert validity was established. In phase 2, the model of Chinese MD-PASS-PE was examined with a sample of 346 secondary school students (M age = 14.94, SD age = 1.42). In phase 3, measurement equivalence and criterion-related validity were examined with a sample of 291 secondary school students (M age = 15.66, SD age = 1.46). Results: Expert validity, internal consistency reliability, confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were established in the first two phases. The model of Chinese MD-PASS-PE is deemed fit and passed measurement invariance across the different samples, while gender invariance didn’t meet the criteria. Positive correlations exist among students’ perceived autonomous support, basic psychological needs, and efforts. Conclusions: The Chinese MD-PASS-PE is valid and reliable, and can be used to measure students' perceptions of teachers' autonomous support behaviors. The measuring results of Chinese MD-PASS-PE can serve as a reference for developing autonomous supportive teaching strategies. Cross-validation is suggested in the future for different ages or contexts.
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 III
表次 VII
圖次 VIII
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的、研究問題與流程 6
第三節 研究範圍 7
第四節 名詞解釋 8
第貳章 文獻探討 10
第一節 自我決定理論 10
第二節 自我決定理論在體育課之應用 15
第三節 教師自主支持在體育課之應用 25
第四節 三向度自主支持量表 30
第參章 研究方法 34
第一節 研究架構 34
第二節 研究流程 35
第三節 研究對象 36
第四節 研究程序 36
第五節 研究步驟 37
第六節 研究工具 40
第七節 資料分析與處理 42
第肆章 結果與討論 44
第一節 階段一:專家效度 44
第二節 階段二:體育課三向度教師自主支持量表模型檢驗 45
第三節 階段三:多群組分析與效標關聯效度檢驗 51
第伍章 結論與建議 61
第一節 結論 61
第二節 建議 62
參考文獻 64
附錄一 體育課三向度教師自主支持量表中文、英文版題項 75
附錄二 中文版基本心理需求量表 (需求滿足構面) 77
附錄三 體育課學生責任量表 (努力構面) 78
附錄四 階段二之量表 79
附錄五 階段三之量表 81
中文文獻
王文宜、陳宥宜、戴育宏、吳志銘 (2017)。體育課介入不同教師自主支持環境對學童體育課情境動機之差異。臺灣運動教育學報,12(1),39-55。
李茂能 (2006)。結構方程模式軟體 AMOS 之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北:心理出版社。
林季燕、馮家榆 (2008)。以自我決定理論預測大專體育課學生動機、興趣及努力之研究。臺中教育大學體育學系系刊,(3), 1-8。
邱皓政 (2011)。結構方程式:LISREL 的理論、技術與運用 (第二版)。台北:雙葉。
徐偉庭、周宏室與潘義祥 (2014)。以自我決定理論為架構檢驗體育課學生的責任行為。體育學報,47(3),425-436。
陳志忠 (2013)。專科女學生體育課基本心理需求對知覺自主性支持預測主觀活力之中介效果。臺灣運動教育學報,8(2),33-50。
陳美芳 (2012)。大專體育課學生調節動機和知覺教師自主支持對於課後正向情緒與持續努力的影響。休閒運動期刊,11,81-92。
陳欽雨、蔡宜雯 (2016)。服務業員工自我概念、正向態度與專業契合對升遷機會之影響。人力資源管理學報,16(2),81-114。
張偉豪 (2011)。論文寫作SEM不求人。高雄市:三星統計。
黃芳銘 (2007)。結構方程模式理論與應用(五版)。台北:五南。
葉素汝、陳美華 (2017)。社會體型焦慮、基本心理需求與體育課動機關係之研究-以有氧舞蹈課為例。臺灣體育學術研究,63,95-110。
劉兆達、許玫琇與張均富 (2019)。體育課學生知覺教師教學行為與運動幸福感之研究-以基本心理需求為中介效果。臺灣體育學術研究,66,75-95。
鍾伯光 (2010)。自我決定理論在教練工作上的應用。運動教練科學,20,1-9。
謝明憲(2008)。焦慮疾患的診斷與治療。中華民國內膜異位症婦女協會會刊,15(9)。
蘇美如、黃英哲 (2009)。 國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係-應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報,14,33-50。

英文文獻
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261-278.
Assor, A., Feinberg, O., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2017). Reducing violence in non-controlling ways: A change program based on self-determination theory. The Journal of Experimental Education.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413.
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Weil-Being in Two Work Settings. J. Appl. Soc. Pyschol, 34, 2045-2068.
Bagozzi, R. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 16, 74-94.
Barkoukis, V., Hagger, M. S., Lambropoulos, G., & Torbatzoudis, H. (2010). Extending the trans- contextual model in physical education and leisure-time contexts: Examining the role of basic psychological need satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 647-670.
Berghe, V. D., L., Vansteenkiste, M., Cardon, G., Kirk, D. & Haerens, L. (2014). Research on self-determination in physical education: Key findings and proposals for future research. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1, 97-121.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit.136-162.
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E.L., Kaap-Deeder, J.V., … Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion volume, 39, 216-236.
Cheng, W. N. K., Hardy, L., & Markland, D. (2009). Toward a three-dimensional conceptualization of performance anxiety: Rationale and initial measurement development. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(2), 271-278.
Cheng, W. N. K., Hardy, L., & Markland, D. (2011). Cross-cultural validation of a three-dimensional measurement model of performance anxiety in the context of Chinese sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 42, 417-435.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
Cox, A., & Williams, L. (2008). The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 222-239.
Cuevas-Campos R, Fernández-Bustos J G, González-Cutre D & Hernández-Martínez A (2020). Need Satisfaction and Need Thwarting in Physical Education and Intention to be Physically Active. Sustainability, 12, 7312.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in
human behaviour. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Deci (2001). The sport climate questionnaire. Center for self-determination theory.
Fin, G., Murcia, J. A. M., León, J., Baretta E., & Nodari-Junior, R. J. (2019). Interpersonal autonomy support style and its consequences in physical education classes. PLoS ONE, 14(5).
Fisher, C. D. (1978). The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 273-288.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388.
Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2007). Self-determination theory and the theory of planned behavior: An integrative approach toward a more complete model of motivation. Psychology of motivation, 83-98.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N., Barkoukis, V.,Wang, C. K. J. & Baranowski, J.
(2005). Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 376-390.
Hagger, M., Chatzisarantis, N.L.D., Barkoukis V., Wang, J. C. K., & Baranowski, J. C. (2005). Perceived Autonomy Support in Physical Education and Leisure-Time Physical Activity: A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Trans-Contextual Model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 376.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soós, I., & Karsai, I. (2007). The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people. Psychol. Sport Exerc, 8, 632-653.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall.
Hein, V. & Caune, A. (2014). Relationships between perceived teacher’s autonomy support, effort and physical self-esteem. Kinesiology, 46(2), 218-226.
Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, 158-176.
Hsu, W., Pan, Y., Chou, H., Lee, W., & Lu, J. H. F. (2014). Measuring students’ responsibility in physical education: Instrument development and validation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45(5), 487-503.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453.
Jackson, D. S., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6-23.
Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 798-811.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016). A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students’ preferred ways. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(4), 686-701.
Jankauskienė, R., Urmanavicius, D., & Baceviciene, M. (2022). Associations between Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support, Self-Determined Motivation, Physical Activity Habits and Non-Participation in Physical Education in a Sample of Lithuanian Adolescents. Behavioral Sciences, 12(9), 314.
Kalajas-Tilga, H., Koka, A., Hein, V., Tilga, H., & Raudsepp, L. (2020). Motivational processes in physical education and objectively measured physical activity among adolescents. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 9(5), 462-471.
Kalajas-Tilga, H., Hein, V., Koka, A, Tilga, H., Raudsepp, L. & Hagger. M. (2022). Application of the Trans-Contextual Model to Predict Change in Leisure Time Physical Activity. Psychology and Health, 37(1), 62-86.
Kaplan, H., & Assor, A. (2012). Enhancing autonomy-supportive I-Thou dialogue in schools: Conceptualization and socio-emotional effects of an intervention program. Social Psychology of Education.
Kaplan, H., Assor, A., El-Sayed, H., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2014). The unique contribution of autonomy support and autonomy frustration to predicting an optimal learning experience in Bedouin students: Testing self-determination theory in a collectivistic society. Dapim Journal for Studies and Research in Education, 58, 41-77.
Koka, A. (2014). The relative roles of teachers and peers on students' motivation in physical education and its relationship to self-esteem and health-related quality of life. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45, 187-213.
Koka, A., Tilga, H., Hein, V., Kalajas-Tilga, H., & Raudsepp, L. (2021). A Multidimensional Approach to Perceived Teachers' Autonomy Support and its Relationship with Intrinsic Motivation of Students in Physical Education. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 52(3), 266-286.
Koka, A., Tilga, H., Kalajas-Tilga, H., Hein, V., & Raudsepp, L. (2020). Detrimental Effect of Perceived Controlling Behavior from Physical Education Teachers on Students’ Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intentions and Behavior: An Application of the Trans-Contextual Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 5939.
Langdon, J., Webster, C., Hall, T., & Monsma, E. (2014). A self-determination theory perspective of student performance at the end of a volleyball unit in compulsory high school physical education. Sport Scientific and Practical Aspects, 11(1), 5-16.
Li, C.,Wang, C. K. J.,Pyun, D. Y.,Kee, Y. H. (2013). Burnout and its relations with basic psychological needs and motivation among athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 14, 692-700.
Lim B. S. & Wang C. K. J. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioral regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 52-60.
Maldonado, E., Zamarripa, J., Ruiz-Juan, F. Pacheco R., & Delgado, M. (2019). Teacher Autonomy Support in Physical Education Classes as a Predictor of Motivation and Concentration in Mexican Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2834.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological methods, 7, 64-82.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self‐determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 225 - 242.
Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A Prospective Study of Participation in Optional School Physical Education Using a Self-Determination Theory Framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 444-453.
Ntoumanis, N. (2002). Motivational clusters in a sample of British physical education classes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(3), 177-194.
Rafael, B., Macarro-Moreno, J., & Medina-Casaubón, J. (2020). Psychometry of the Multidimensional Perceived Autonomy Support Scale in Physical Education With Spanish Secondary School Students. SAGE journals.
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175.
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-Determination Theory: A Dialectical Framework for Understanding Socio-Cultural Influences on Student Motivation. Big Theories Revisited, 31-60.
Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing Students' Engagement by Increasing Teachers' Autonomy Support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 3-33.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 654-678.
Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin J., & Fahlman M. (2009). Effects of Teacher Autonomy Support and Students' Autonomous Motivation on Learning in Physical Education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(1), 44-53.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L. & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97-110.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2006). Students' Motivational Processes and Their Relationship to Teacher Ratings in School Physical Education: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. March 2006 Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77(1), 100-10.
Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39, 97-110.
Sun, H.,Li, W., & Shen, B. (2017). Learning in physical education: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(3), 277-291.
Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., Standage M., & Spray C. M. (2010). Motivational Predictors of Physical Education Students’ Effort, Exercise Intentions, and Leisure-Time Physical Activity: A Multilevel Linear Growth Analysis. February 2010 Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(1), 99-120.
Tilga, H. Hein, V. & Koka. A. (2017). Measuring the Perception of the Teachers’ Autonomy-Supportive Behaviour in Physical Education: Development and Initial Validation of a Multidimensional Instrument. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science.
Tilga, H., Hein, V., Koka, A., & Hagger, M. (2020). How Physical Education Teachers’ Interpersonal Behaviour is Related to Students’ Health-Related Quality of Life. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(5), 661-676.
Tilga, H., Kalajas-Tilga, H., Hein, V., Raudsepp. L., & Koka, A. (2020). How does perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling behaviour in physical education relate to adolescents’ leisure-time physical activity participation? Kinesiology 52(2), 265-272.
Tilga, H., Kalajas-Tilga, H., H., Hein, V., Raudsepp. L., & Koka, A. (2020). Effects of a brief one-day autonomy-supportive intervention on improving basic psychological needs, motivation, and behaviours of physical activity among middle-school students: A multidimensional approach. International Journal of Sport Psychology.
Tilga, H.; Kalajas-Tilga, H.; Hein, V.; Raudsepp, L.; Koka, A. (2021). Perceived Autonomy Support from Peers, Parents, and Physical Education Teachers as Predictors of Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life among Adolescents - A One-Year Longitudinal Study. Educ Sci, 11, 457.
Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P., Hilland, T., & Cinelli, R. L. (2019). Self-Determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. October 2019Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7).
Vandenberg, R. J. and Lance, C.E. (2000). A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
Vlachopoulos, S. P., Katartzi, E. S., & Kontou, M. G. (2011). The Basic Psychological Needs in Physical Education Scale. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(3), 263-280.
Wang, C. K. J., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Spray, C. M., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2010). Achievement goal profiles in school physical education: Differences in self-determination, sport ability beliefs, and physical activity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 433-445.
Wang, C.J., & Biddle, S.J. (2001). Young people’s motivational profiles in physical activity: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 23(1), 1-22.
Williams, G.C.; Deci, E.L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 70, 767-779.
Zhang, T., Solmon, M. A., Kosma, M., Carson, R. L., & Gu, X. (2011). Need Support, Need Satisfaction, Intrinsic Motivation, and Physical Activity Participation among Middle School Students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(1), 51-68.
Zimmermann J, Tilga H, Bachner J & Demetriou Y, (2020). The German Multi-Dimensional Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Physical Education: Adaption and Validation in a Sample of Lower Track Secondary School Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(19), 7353.
Zimmermann J, Tilga H, Bachner J, Demetriou Y, (2021). The Effect of Teacher Autonomy Support on Leisure-Time Physical Activity via Cognitive Appraisals and Achievement Emotions: A Mediation Analysis Based on the Control-Value Theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(8), 3987.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *