本研究旨在辨析影響臺灣後期中等教育階段技職教育吸引力的相關因素，探討不同背景變項下，技術型高中學生、教師對於技職教育吸引力觀點的差異，並嘗試建立技職教育吸引力框架。爲達研究目的，透過文本分析闡述臺灣中等技職教育發展沿革脈絡，並參照其他主要國家中等技職教育體系概況，以對現狀獲得更廣泛認識；並就相關文獻理論歸結出技職教育吸引力影響因素的相關向度及具體指標。
　　隨後據以發展「高級中等技職教育之吸引力調查問卷」，對2,154位學生進行調查；並訪談共30位技術型高中學生及教師，深刻詮釋學生觀點，亦結合教師意見，與文本分析結果互相印證，藉此探討技職教育吸引力之內涵及意義，並得以提供後續研究及辦理中等技職技育之參考。研究主要發現如下：
一、辨析出影響臺灣地區技職教育對於技術型高中學生吸引力的因素，可分為「對技職教育進路的期待」、「社會大眾印象」、「家人支持」、「技職學校品質」、「就學滿意程度」、「終身學習意願」六項因素。
二、確定不同背景變項下技職教育吸引力呈現的顯著差異，其中東部地區學生較關注技職教育的將來職涯發展；動力機械群學生亦著重技職教育務實致用的特色。
三、察覺技術型高中學生隱含兩種特殊印象，一為忽略專業學科的重要，稱「專業的假象」；二為輕視共同科目價值，稱「偏向的取捨」，陷入唯技術獨尊的迷思。
四、迴歸及路徑分析發現「就學滿意程度」可使用其他五項因素進行有效解釋及預測。
五、基於研究結果，建立得以解釋及預測技職教育吸引力影響因素之可能模型。

　This study aims to analyze the factors affecting the attractiveness of technological and vocational education in the upper secondary education stage in Taiwan, and to explore the views of skill-based senior high school students and teachers on the attractiveness of technological and vocational education under different background variable. Try to establish a framework that can effectively explain and predict the attractiveness of technological and vocational education. In order to achieve the purpose of research, this study elaborated the context of the development of secondary technological and vocational education in Taiwan through textual analysis, and refer to the overview of the secondary technological and vocational education system in other major countries in order to have a broader understanding the current status; moreover, summarizes the relevant dimensions and explicit index affecting the attractiveness of technological and vocational education in the upper secondary education stage in Taiwan according to the relevant literature theory.
　Subsequently, according to the development of the "Technological and Vocational Education Attractiveness Questionnaire", 2,154 students were surveyed; and a total of 30 skill-based senior high school students and teachers were interviewed to deeply interpre their views. It also combines the opinions of teachers and the results of textual analysis to verify each other, to explore the connotation and significance of the attractiveness of technological and vocational education, and to provide follow-up research and reference for secondary technological and vocational education. The findings of this study are as follows:
1.The six factors affecting the attractiveness of secondary technological and vocational education in Taiwan to skill-based senior high school students can be divided into “The expectation of the technological and vocational education approach”, “The impression of the public”, “Family support”, “Quality of technological and vocational school”, “Satisfaction at skill-based senior high school”, and “willingness for lifelong learning”.
2.The significant differences in the attractiveness of technological and vocational education under different background variables are determined. Among them, students in the eastern region pay more attention to the future career development of technological and vocational education; the students of the Power Mechanical Engineering Group also emphasize the characteristics of practical.
3.It is obvious that skill-based senior high school students imply two special impressions, one is to ignore the importance of professional disciplines, called "professional illusion"; the second is to despise the value of common subjects, called "biased choice", and fall into the myth that only focuses on skills.
4.Regression and path analysis found that "study satisfaction" can be effectively explained and predicted using five other factors.
5.Based on the research results, establish a possible model to explain and predict the factors affecting the attractiveness of technological and vocational education.

第壹章 緒論　1
第一節 研究動機　1
第二節 研究背景　2
第三節 研究目的及問題　6
第四節 重要名詞解釋　7
第五節 研究範圍與限制　11
第貳章 文獻探討　13
第一節 技職教育吸引力的定義與內涵　13
第二節 影響技職教育吸引力的因素　19
第三節 主要國家技職教育概況　27
第四節 我國技職教育發展與沿革　48
第五節 技職教育吸引力的向度與具體指標　55
第參章 實徵研究設計與實施　59
第一節 研究方法與步驟　59
第二節 訪談實施部分　62
第三節 訪談資料分析方式　67
第四節 問卷調查部分　72
第五節 調查問卷考驗分析　77
第肆章 研究結果分析與討論　93
第一節 正式問卷施測分析　93
第二節 綜合分析與研究發現正式問卷施測分析　117
第三節 「就學滿意程度」之逐步多元迴歸分析　148
第伍章 結論與建議　153
第一節 結論　153
第二節 建議　163
參考文獻 　167
附錄　181

王俊明（1999）。問卷與量表的編製及分析方法。載於張至滿、王俊明（主編），體育測驗與評價（139-158頁）。台北市：中華民國體育學會。
石政言、蔣佳玲（2016）。進修學校學生之職業認同與對進修學校功能之看法。教育實踐與研究，29（1），67-96。
石政言（2014）。高職進修教育學生對於進修教育功能的看法。收錄於中華民國科學教育學會主編，第30屆科學教育學術研討會 (2014) 論文彙編（頁127-131）。台北：國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
安維複（2002）。走向社會建構主義:海德格爾、哈貝馬斯和芬伯格的技術理念。科學技術與辯證法，19（6），33-38。
朱春豔（2008）。費恩伯格的技術批判理論的內涵。東北大學學報（社會科學版），10（5），382-386。
吳明烈（2015）。終身學習：理念與實踐（頁12-13）。台北：五南圖書。
吳明振、林雅幸、陳培基（2014）。技職教育再造的挑戰與展望。中等教育，65（2），6-20。
吳明隆（2000）。SPSS統計應用實務。臺北市：松崗。
吳清山、高家斌（2007）。臺灣中等教育改革分析：1994-2007年。教育資料集刊，34，1-24。
吸引力（無日期）。教育部重編國語辭典修訂本。取自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cbdic/ gsweb.cgi
李玉靜、陳衍（2009）。增強技職教育吸引力歐洲的政策，理念與實踐。職業技術教育，12，24-37。
李隆盛、賴春金（2007）。技職教育現況及其未來發展。國家菁英季刊，3（1），35-45。
邱皓政（2010）。量化硏究與統計分析：SPSS（PASW）資料分析範例（頁6-11 - 6-16）。台北：五南圖書。
周玉秀（2016）。追求品質的奧地利職業教育。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（2），153-155。
周晶、萬興亞（2013）。制度變遷理論視域下增強技職教育吸引力的兩個維度。現代教育管理，8，83-87。
孟景舟（2010）。我國技職教育吸引力的歷史透視。教育發展研究，7，54-57。
易正義（2007）。晚清實業教育制度的建立與實業學堂之創辦。亞東學報，27，193-204。
林大森（1999）。臺灣地區家庭背景對中等教育分流的影響：[高中/高職]與[公立/私立]差異的探討。東吳社會學報，8，35-77。
林大森（2002）。高中/高職的公立/私立分流對地位取得之影響。教育與心理研究，25（1），35-62。
林大森（2006）。技術學院與科技大學新生主修科系轉換之分析。教育與社會研究，10，93-124。
林俊彥、王姿涵（2011）。美國與臺灣技職教育制度比較。教育資料集刊，51，51-68。
南海、白漢剛（2010）。對“增強職業教育吸引力”的分析。教育發展研究，7，50-53。
姚清煇（2015）。當前技職教育的問題及改進。商業技職教育，137，23-28。
胡幼慧（2013）。質性研究：理論，方法及本土女性研究實例（二版）（頁125-129）。台北：巨流。
胡茹萍（2010）。韓國的職業教育。臺灣國際研究季刊，6（4），71-92。
胡茹萍（2015）。自技職學術化成因省思技職教育教師之培訓。臺灣教育評論月刊，4（11），24-26。
唐智彬、石偉平（2009）。國際比較視野中的技職教育吸引力問題。教育科學，6，62-67。
涂金堂（2009）。教育測驗與評量。臺北市：三民。
涂金堂（2012）。量表編製與SPSS。臺北市：五南。
秦夢群（2014）。我國後期中等教育畢業進路問題之初探。教育人力與專業發展，31（4），18-22。
高海青（2015）。時代思潮中的技術批判理論—安德魯·芬伯格教授訪談錄。自然辯證法研究，31（3），27-31。
高級中等以下學校及幼兒園教師資格檢定辦法（2014年8月29日修正）。
高級中等教育法（2013年7月10日公告頒佈）。
陳文化、沈健、胡桂香（2001）。關於技術哲學研究的再思考—從美國哲學界圍繞技術問題的一場爭論談起。哲學研究，8，60-66。
陳向明（2004）。社會科學質的研究（三版）。台北：五南圖書。
陳志福（2015）。從高職淺談建構技職教育完善體系。商業技職教育，137，29-32。
陳怡靖（2001）。臺灣地區高中∕技職分流與教育機會不均等性之變遷。教育研究集刊，47，253-282。
國家教育研究院（編）（2012）。教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/。
張仁家、游宗達（2014）。德國雙軌技職教育對我國技職教育之啟示。臺灣國際研究季刊，10（3），173-188。
張春興（1995）。現代心理學。台北：東華書局。
張紅華（2010）。增強技職教育吸引力的研究。中國教育技術裝備，6，18-19。
張國保、李寶琳（2014）。我國技職人材培育的問題與前瞻。教育資料與研究，112，53-76。
張清溪、吳惠林（1996）。教育應以經濟發展為目的？。台北市：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育技術型高級中等學校群科課程綱要─動力機械群。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001824
教育部（2016）。技術及職業教育政策綱領（2017年3月16日公告）。
教育部（2015）。技術及技職教育法（2015年1月14日公告）。
教育部（2009）。技職教育再造方案-培育專業優質人力。台北市：教育部。
教育部統計處（2015）。103學年度高級中等學校應屆畢業生升學就業概況調查【原始數據】。未出版之統計數據。取自http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/investigate/high_graduate/103 /103_Graduate.pdf
教育部統計處（2017）。105學年度高級中等學校專業群科（高職）應屆畢業生流向概況【原始數據】。未出版之統計數據。取自http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/高級中等學校專業群科（高職）應屆畢業生流向概況.pdf
教育部統計處（2019a）。各級學校資料（高中職）【原始數據】。未出版之統計數據。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/
教育部統計處（2019b）。各級學校專任教師數（高中職）【原始數據】。未出版之統計數據。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/
教育部統計處（2019c）。普通科學生及畢業生數、職業類科學生及畢業生數【原始數據】。未出版之統計數據。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/
梁忠銘（2001）。日本教育特質的研究。高雄市：復文。
梁福鎮（2009）。當前歐盟教育政策之探究。教育科學期刊，8（2），37-53。
章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志（1996）。教育分流與社會經濟地位：兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。台北市：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
黃怡雯（2007）。面對少子化現象學校行銷的涵義與因應策略。學校行政，49， 272-287。
黃俊傑（2007）。二十一世紀的大學專業教育與通識教育：互動與融合。通識學刊：理念與實務，1（2），1-27。
黃信洋、馬藹萱（2011）。向左走，向右走：從生命史探討教育及職業選擇之發展曲線與社會影響。社會科學論叢，5（1），139-200。
黃政傑（2000）。技職教育的發展與前瞻。台北：師大書苑。
黃能堂（2011）。我國技職教育之變革及其影響因素分析。載於溫明麗（主編），我國百年教育回顧與展望（頁53-66）。新北市：國家教育研究院。
湯維玲、顏慶祥（2002）。教育百科辭典。台北：五南圖書。
楊惟雯（2014年11月18日）。現代學徒制11：新加坡工藝教育學院【線上論壇】。取自http://nmart.pixnet. net/blog/post/59328124。
楊朝祥（2011）。美國技職教育發展的沿革，現況與展望。教育資料集刊，47，135-164。
楊瑞明（2014）。臺灣高職教育應有的變革與調準。新北市教育，11，15-22。
實業學校令（無日期）。國家教育研究院教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/
1313067/?index=2
廖年淼（2002）。臺灣高職學校就業導向教育目標之檢驗：高職與高中畢業生就業表現之比較研究。教育學刊，19，137-159。
廖年淼（2006）。我國高職教育發展之比較分析論文集（頁1-22）。台北市：秀威出版。
趙志揚、吳金蓮、陳高生（2013）。日本技職教育體系人力供給之現況及其義蘊。教育資料集刊，59，27-62。
鄭光甫、韋端（2003）。抽樣方法-理論與實務。台北：三民。
鄭慶民、陳雪鳳、陳寶琳（2014）。 十二年國教下高職學校之發展與定位。新北市教育，11，23-27。
鄭慶民、劉怡萍（2011）。我國建教合作教育執行成效與檢討。收錄於國立臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所主編，2011技職教育永續發展學術研討會論文集（頁37-47）。臺北：國立臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所。
蔡瑞明、林大森（2000）。教育與勞動市場的連結：以臺灣分流教育為例。載於劉兆佳（主編），市場、階級與政治：變遷中的華人社會（頁143-190）。香港：香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。
劉光斌（2012）。技術合理性的社會批判：從瑪律庫塞，哈貝馬斯到芬伯格。東北大學學報（社會科學版），14（2），107-112。
賴振昌（2015）。翻轉臺灣教育，重建臺灣生機：釐清技職教育定位，強化其功能。商業技職教育，137，2-6。
賴曉黎（2013）。技術之本質-海德格<技術的追問>再思考。東吳哲學學報，27，33-72。
穆佩芬（1996）。現象學研究法。護理研究，4（2），195-202。
謝小芩、張晉芬、黃淑玲（1996）。教改叢刊AB11-技職教育改革與職業學校的運作。臺北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
職訓局（無日期）。勞動力發展辭典。取自http://laborpedia.evta.gov.tw/link1.asp?did=E019&
result =yes
嚴璿（2010）。提升職業教育吸引力的歐盟模式：內涵，政策與問題。教育與職業，11，17-19。
蘇敏（2009）。從企業角度談技職教育的吸引力。中國職業技術教育，34，31-33。
龔雅雯、王泓翔、張素惠（2015）。新加坡職業教育及訓練發展現況與策略之探討。技術及職業教育學報，6（2），17-42。
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Allchin, D. (2000). Thinking about Technology and the Technology of 'Thinking about'. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 1(5), 1-4.
Archan, S., & Mayr, T. (2006). Vocational education and training in Austria Short description. Luxembourg: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.
Attractiveness (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attractiveness
Attractiveness (n.d.). In Oxford learners dictionaries. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordlearnerdictionaries.com/definition/english/attractiveness?q=attractiveness
Auernheimer, Georg. (2006). The German Education System: Dysfunctional for an Immigration Society. European Education, 37(4), 75-89.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Balsamo, M., Lauriola, M., & Saggino, A. (2013). Work values and college major choice. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 110-116.
Ben-Israel, A., & Greville, T. N. (2003). Generalized inverses: theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
Berg, B. L., Lune, H., & Lune, H. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Borgmann, A. (2009). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3), 253-271.
Brown, A. (1998). Qualifications for employment and higher education: a collaborative investigation across Europe (Report No. 18).Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. (3rd ed.) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Choi, J., Misko, J., Phan, O., & Kang, K. J. (2001). Linkages between vocational education and training providers and industry. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET).
Coleman, J. (1968). The concept of equality of educational opportunity. Harvard Educational Review, 38(1), 7-22.
Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-Analytic Methods of Scale Development in Personality and Clinical Psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 754-61.
Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational research methods, 6(2), 147-168.
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
Cutcliffe, J. R., & McKenna, H. P. (2002). When do we know that we know? Considering the truth of research findings and the craft of qualitative research. International Journal of nursing studies, 39(6), 611-618.
Danney, G. (2004). Learning to Earn : A History of Career and Technology Education in Oklahoma. Oklahoma, OK: Department of Career and Technology Education.
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., & Vlaev, I. (2010). Mindspace: Institute for Government. London, England: Cabinet Office.
Dunkel, T., Le Mouillour, I., & Teichler, U. (2009). Through the looking-glass Diversification and differentiation in vocational education and training and higher education.　In: CEDEFOP (ed.) Modernising vocational education and training Fourth report on vocational education and training research in Europe: background report Volume 2(pp. 239-264). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Enzmann, D. (1997). RanEigen: A program to determine the parallel analysis criterion for the number of principal components. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(3), 232.
European Communities (2002a, November 20). The Copenhagen Declaration [Press releases database]. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/pdf/doc125_en.pdf.
European Commission (2002b, November 20). European Commission Proposes 5 European Benchmark for Education and Training Systems in Europe[Press releases database]. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/02/1710&format=HTML&
aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
European Communities (2004, December 14). Maastricht Communiqué [Press releases database]. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/vocational/
maastricht_en.pdf
European Communities (2006, December 5). Helsinki Communiqué [Press releases database]. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/vocational/
helsinki_en.pdf
European Communities (2008, November 26). Bordeaux Communiqué [Press releases database]. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/vocational/
bordeaux_en.pdf.
European Communities (2010, December 7). Bruges Communiqué [Press releases database]. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/vocational/
bruges_en.pdf
European Communities (2011, April 19). Vocational Education and Training (VET) Europe: A Policy Overview. Retrieved from http://www.euroguidance.nl/uploads/VET_Publicatie_
web_def.p_2011042 609260.pdf
Feenberg A. (2012).Questioning technology. London: Routledge.
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (pp. 311-348). Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
Foster, P. N. (1997). Lessons from history: Industrial arts/technology education as a case. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 13(2), 1.
Fuchs, Hans. W., & Lutz, R. Reuter. (2004). Education and Schooling in East Germany. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(5), 529-37.
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
Great Britain. HM Government. (2015). Reviewing post-16 education and training institutions. London, England: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A global perspective. NJ: Person Prentice Hall.
Hansen, J. S. (1994). Preparing for the Workplace: Charting a Course for Federal Postupper Training Policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Hempel, D. J. (1977). Consumer satisfaction with the home buying process: Conceptualization and measurement. Marketing Science Institute, 6, 7-21.
Hoover Institution Archives (2000). Preliminary inventory to the Sidney Percy Marland Papers, 1943-1991. Box 3. Career Education. Retrieved from http://www.oac.cdlib.org/data/13030/
tn/tf467n99tn/files/tf 467n99tn.pdf
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185.
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychological methods, 14(1), 6-23.
Jarvie, I. C., & Skolimowski, H. (1966). The social character of technological problems: comments on Skolimowski's paper. Technology and Culture, 7(3), 384-390.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Kuczera, M., Kis, V., & Wurzburg, G. (2009). Learning for Jobs OECDReviews of Vocational Education and Training for Korea. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/53/49/
42689417.pdf
Laanan, F. S., Compton, J. I., & Friedel, J. N. (2006). The role of career and technical education in Iowa community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30, 293-310.
Laska, J. A. (1976). Schooling and education: basic concepts and problems. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Lasonen, J., & Gordon, J. (2008). Improving the attractiveness and image of VET. In: CEDEFOP (ed.) Modernising vocational education and training Fourth report on vocational education and training research in Europe: background report Volume 3(pp. 15-88). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Lasonen, J., & Young, M. (1998). Strategies for achieving parity of esteem in European upper upper education, Institute for Educational Research. Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.
Lee, Jung-Pyo and Jung, Tae-Hwa. (2005). Vocational Education for NationalCompetitiveness. In Jang-Ho Kim (Eds.), New Paradigm of Human ResourcesDevelopment (pp. 61-78). Seoul, South Korea: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET).
Lee, Young-Hyun. (2000). Technical and Vocational Education and Training in Korea.Seoul, South Korea: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET).
Leney, T. et al. (2004). Achieving the Lisbon goal: the contribution of VET: final report to the European Commission. London: QCA – Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
Lester, P. E., Inman, D., & Bishop, L. K. (2014). Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Levesque, K., Laird, J., Hensley, E., Choy, S. P., Cataldi, E. F., & Hudson, L. (2008). Career and technical education in the United States: 1990 to 2005 (NCES 2008-035). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Levin, H. M. (1976). Educational opportunity and social inequality in Western Europe. Social Problems, 24(2), 148-172.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E. G.(1985). Naturalistic inquiry (pp. 289-331). Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
Luetkemeyer, J. F. (1987). The Snedden/Prosser Social Efficiency Paradigm of Vocational Education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 25(1), 31-43.
Lynch, R. (2000). High school career and technical education for the first decade of the twenty-first century. Journal of Vocational Education, 25, 155-198.
Manning, S. (1996). Qualifications with a Dual Orientation towards Employment and Higher Education. A Comparative Investigation of Innovative Schemes in Seven European Countries (INTEQUAL Report I.). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED407508.pdf
Manning, S. (1997). Qualifications with a Dual Orientation towards Employment and Higher Education. A Comparative Investigation of Innovative Schemes in Seven European Countries (INTEQUAL Report II.). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED416397.pdf
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan [MEXT] (2009). Guidelines for high schools. Tokyo, Japan: Author.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan [MEXT] (2013a). 2007 White paper of the MEXT. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/
hpab200701/002/002.htm
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan [MEXT] (2013b). A synopsis of basic requirements for establishing a special school. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shougai/senshuu/06082502.htm
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan [MEXT] (2013c). About junior colleges. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/tandai/index.htm
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST). (2008). Major Policies andPlans for 2009. Retrieved from http://english.mest.go.kr/main.jsp?idx=0301010101
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST). (2009). Major Policies andPlans for 2010. Retrieved from http://english.mest.go.kr/main.jsp?idx=0301010101
Molm, L. D. (2015). Homans’s Vision of Social Exchange. In A. Javier Treviño (Eds.), George C. Homans: History, Theory, and Method(pp. 135-167). New York, NY: Routledge.
Moodie, G. (2002). Identifying vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54(2), 249-266.
Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and extension of the SVR theory of dyadic pairing. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49(4), 929-933.
Myers, J. L., Well, A. D., & Lorch Jr, R. F. (2013). Research Design and Statistical Analysis(pp. 193-195). New York, NY: Routledge.
Na, S. I. (2009). The Present State and the Future Challenges of Vocational Education in the Republic of Korea. Bulletin of Educational Resources and Research, 43, 167-98.
Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural equation modeling, 10(4), 622-647.
OECD (2012). The Cinderella of tertiary education: postupper vocational education and training. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/50305415.pdf
OECD (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/eag2013%20(eng)--FINAL%2020%20June%202013.pdf
Oliver, R. (1981). Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Process in Retail Settings. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 25-48.
Parsons, D. J., Hughes, J., Allinson, C., & Walsh, K. (2009). The training and development of VET teachers and trainers in Europe. In: CEDEFOP (ed.) Modernising vocational education and training Fourth report on vocational education and training research in Europe: background report Volume 2(pp. 67-141). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Pitt, J. C. (2000) Thinking about technology: foundations of the philosophy of technology (pp. 30-31). New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Rauner, F., & Maclean, R. (2008). 3.3.3.4 Historical research in vocational edcation, In F. Rauner & R. Maclean (Eds.), Handbook of technical and vocational education and training research (p. 279). Bremen and Bonn: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008.
Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological assessment, 12(3), 287-297.
Seng, L. S. (2012). Case Study on ‘National Policies Linking TVET with Economic Expansion: Lessons from Singapore’ (EFA Report No. 34). Retrieved from The EFA Global Monitoring Report. UNESCO, Germany.
Siikaniemi, L. (2005). Magnetic metal: towards a model for satisfaction of education and career in vocational upper upper education and training of machinery and metal technology in the Lahti region. (unpublished dissertation). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
Skolimowski, H. (1966). The Structure of Thinking in Technology. Technology and Culture, 7(3), 371.
Stasz, C., Drabble, S., Castle-Clarke, S., Ertl, H., Holmes, C., & Villalba van Dijk, L. (2014). Attractiveness of Initial Vocational Education and Training: identifying what matters (Cedefop Research Paper no. 5539). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Super, D. E. (1990). Career and life development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (2nd ed., pp. 197-261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tchibozo, G. (2009). Improving attractiveness of initial vocational education and training: some observations on the EU experience. The Conference Lifelong learning revisited: what next?University of Stirling, Scotland.
Trant, A., Branson, J., Frangos, C., Geaney, F., Lawton, D., Makinen, R., ... & Walsh, P. (1999). Reconciling liberal and vocational education. Dublin, Ireland: Curriculum Development Unit.
Tse, D. & Wilton P. (1988). Models of Consumer Satisfaction: An Extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 204-212.
UNESCO (2012). The 3nd international congress of technical and vocational education and training, UNESCO conclusions. Paris：UNESCO.
Watters, E. (2009). Making IVET more attractive for learners: results of the work undertaken by the thematic group on making VET more attractive. Dublin: ENQA-VET, European Network for Quality Assurance.
Wolf, A. (2011). Review of Vocational Education (DFE Report 00031). Retrieved from Department for Education (U.K.): https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_
data/file/1805 04/DFE-00031-2011.pdf