|
• Abdul Rahman, F. B., Mustafa, Z., & Kharuddin, A. F. (2021). Employing Fuzzy
• Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. J Med Libr Assoc. 103(3), 152–153. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010.
• Adebola, S. O., Odejobi, O. A. and Koya, O. A. (2013). Design and implementation of a locally-sourced robotic arm. Africon, 1-4. doi: 10.1109/AFRCON.2013.6757721
• Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health (Eds.). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
• Aerospace Education Civil Air Patrol. (2011). Introduction to Robotics. A Product of Civil Air Patrol Aerospace Education, US.
• Ai, Yong-bao., Rui, Ting., Yang, Xiao-qiang., He, Jia-lin., Fu, Lei., Li, Jian-bin, & Liu, Ming. (2020). Visual SLAM in dynamic environments based on object detection. Defence Technology. doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.09.012
• Akalin, N., Uluer, P., Kose, H. & Ince, G. (2013). Humanoid robots communication with participants using sign language: An interaction-based sign language game. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), Tokyo, Japan, 7–9 November 2013.
• Akimov, A., & Malin, M. (2020). When old becomes new: a case study of oral examination as an online assessment tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1730301
• Akın, S., Yıldırım, A., & Goodwin, A. L. (2016). Classroom Management through the Eyes of Elementary Teachers in Turkey: A Phenomenological Study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(3), 771-797. DOI 10.12738/estp.2016.3.0376.
• Ala-Mutka, K. (2004). Problems in learning and teaching programming. Retrieved from https://www.cs.tut.fi/~edge/literature_study.pdf
• Allen, K. C. (2013). Robots bring math-powered ideas to life. Mathematic Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 340-347.
• Al-Othman, A. A. (2020). The Impact of Teaching Programming by using Scratch on Self-motivation towards Learning Programming for Primary School Students in Riyadh. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.24200/jeps.vol14iss1pp54-70
• Altakhayneh, B. (2020). The Impact of Using the LEGO Education Program on Mathematics Achievement of Different Levels of Elementary Students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 603 – 610. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujer.9.2.603
• Alzahrani, N., Vahid, F., Edgcomb, A., Nguyen, K. & Lysecky, R. (2018). Python Versus C++: An Analysis of Student Struggle on Small Coding Exercises in Introductory Programming Courses. SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3160586
• American Association of School Administrators. (1992). Anecdotal records: Learning points.
• Ameyaw, K.B., Ofori, K.N., Adjepong, B., Assem, H.D. (2018). Using Observational Techniques as Assessment Instruments to Improve Learners’ Performance at Nkawkaw, Ghana. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 8 (6), 87-96. DOI: 10.9790/7388-0806048796
• Amin, H. A., Shehata, M. H.K. & Ahmed, S, A. (2020). Step-by-step Guide to Create Competency-Based Assignments as an Alternative for Traditional Summative Assessment. MedEdPublish. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000120.1
• Anderson L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New YorkNY: Longmans. [Google Scholar]
• Andrade, H. L. (2019). A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment. Front. Educ. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
• Anwari, I., Yamada, S., Unno, M., Saito, T., Suwarma, I. R., Mutakinati, L., & Kumano, Y. (2015). Implementation of authentic learning and assessment through stem education approach to improve students’ metacognitive skills. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 123-136.
• Anyoha, R. (2017). The History of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/history-artificial-intelligence/
• Arabacıoğlu, C., Bülbül, H., & Filiz, A. (2007). A new approach to teaching computer programming. The Academic Computing Conference, the Kutahya, Turkey.
• Arduino. https://www.arduino.cc/
• Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s Taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved [2022 March, 8] from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/
• Arnold, W. F., & Carpenter, C. J. (1984, July). Robotic arm: A contribution to the curriculum. An Occasional Paper. London: Further Education Unit
• ARPDC Professional Development Resources. https://arpdcresources.ca/
• Arsenault, J., Godsoe, S., Holden, C. and Vetelino, J. (2005). Integration of sensors into secondary school classrooms. Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, S2F-33. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2005.1612237.
• Asimakopoulos, K., Zoulias, E., Saranteas, I., Makaris. I., Sandali, G. and Spiliou, T. (2018). Τhe eCraft2Learn project in 1st EPAL KORYDALLOS: integrating a FabLab in the school curriculum. Πρακτικά Εργασιών 11 ου Πανελλήνιου και Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου «Οι ΤΠΕ στην Εκπαίδευση», σ. χ-ψ ΑΠΘ – ΠΑΜΑΚ, Θεσσαλονίκη, 19-21 Οκτωβρίου 2018. Retrieved from https://project.ecraft2learn.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Asimakopoulos_et_al.pdf
• Asiyai, R. I. (2011). Effective Classroom Management Techniques for Secondary Schools. African Research Review, 5(1). DOI: 10.4314/afrrev.v5i1.64526
• Association for Advancing Automation (3A). (2011). NI LabVIEW for Education Software for High Schools. Retrieved from (2021 July, 13) https://www.automate.org/news/ni-labview-for-education-software-for-high-schools
• Asto Buditjahjanto, Gusti Putu., Ardi, P., Munoto, M & Samani, M. (2020). Evaluating and Analyzing of Robotic Arm as Learning Media Based on Partial Least Square Method. TEM Journal, 9(2), 672-679. DOI: 10.18421/TEM92-33.
• Auerbach, J. E., Concordel, A., Kornatowski, P. M. & Floreano, D. (2019). Inquiry-Based Learning with RoboGen: An Open-Source Software and Hardware Platform for Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies,12(3), 356-369. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2018.2833111.
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment, Reporting Authority. (2013). Draft Australian curriculum: Technologies. Retrieved from http://consultation.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Static/docs/Technologies/Draft%20Australian%20Curriculum%20Technologies%20-%20February%202013.pdf
• Avanzato, R. (2002). Mobile Robot Navigation Contest for Undergraduate Design and K-12 Outreach. 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2—10815.
• Avsec, S., Rihtarsic, D., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). A predictive study of learner attitudes toward open learning in a robotics class. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 692–704. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-014-9496-6
• Babadjanova, N. (2020). Effective classroom management techniques for curriculum of 21st century. Science and Education Scientific Journal, 1(7). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/effective-classroom-management-techniques-for-curriculum-of-21st-century/viewer
• Badeleh, A. (2021). The effects of robotics training on students’ creativity and learning in physics. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1353–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09972-6
• Bakker, P. & Kuniyoshi, Y. (2009). Robot see, robot do: An overview of robot imitation. In Proceedings of the AISB96 Workshop on Learning in Robots and Animals, Kobe, Japan, 3–11. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.27.292&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Balanskat, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2014). Computing our future: Computer programming and coding-Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. European Schoolnet. Retrieved from http://www.eun.org/resources/detail?publicationID=481
• Barak, M. (2010). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education. Int J Technol Des Educ, 20, 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9092-x
• Barak, M., & Albert, D. (2017). Fostering systematic inventive thinking (SIT) and self-regulated learning (SRL) in problem-solving and troubleshooting processes among engineering experts in industry. Australasian Journal of Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v4i1.45
• Barr, A. S. (1929). The Supervision of Classroom Instruction. Yearbook of the National Association of Secondary-School Principals. Journal of Educational Research, 13(25), 142–155. doi:10.1177/019263652901302518
• Barrón-Estrada, M.L., Zatarain-Cabada, R., Romero-Polo, J.A. et al. (2021). Patrony: A mobile application for pattern recognition learning. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10636-7
• Bartoletti, R. (2016). Learning through Design: MOOC Development as a Method for Exploring Teaching Methods. Current Issues in Emerging Learning, 3(1). https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol3/iss1/2
• Bates, C. C., Schenck, S.M. & Hoover, H. J. (2019). Anecdotal Records: Practical Strategies for Taking Meaningful Notes. YC Young Children, 74(3), 14-19. National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26788997
• Battista, G. A., & Manaugh, K. (2017). Using Embodied Videos of Walking Interviews in Walkability Assessment. Transportation Research Record, 2661(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.3141/2661-02
• Beckmann, J., & Weber, P. (2016). Cognitive presence in virtual collaborative learning: Assessing and improving critical thinking in online discussion forums. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(1), 52–70.
• Behrendt, M. & Franklin, T. (2014). A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education. International Society of Educational Research, 9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1031445.pdf
• Bell, C. A., Dobbelaer, M. J., Klette, K. & Visscher, A. (2019). Qualities of classroom observation systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014
• Bencheva, N. & Kostadinov, N. (2017). Teaching Hardware/Software Co-design of Embedded Systems – a Case Study. 27th EAEEIE Annual Conference (EAEEIE), 1-2. doi: 10.1109/EAEEIE.2017.8768584.
• Bendechache, M., Tal, I., Wall, P., Grehan, L., Clarke, E., O’ Driscoll, A., Van Der Haegen, L., Leong, B., Kearns, A. & Brennan, R. (2021). AI in My Life: AI, Ethics & Privacy Workshops for 15-16-Year-Olds. WebSci '21: 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462741.3466664
• Bengio Y. (2012). Practical Recommendations for Gradient-Based Training of Deep Architectures. In: Montavon G., Orr G.B., Müller KR. Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade (eds). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7700. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_26
• Bennet, J. (2017). Artificial Neural Nets For "Kids". Retrieved from (2021 July, 5) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321162382_Artificial_Neural_Nets_For_Kids
• Benson, N. F., Floyd, R. G., Kranzler, J.H., Eckert, T. L., Fefere, S. A. & Morgan, G. B. (2019). Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 National Survey. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004
• Billard, Aude. and Grollman, Daniel. (2013). Robot learning by demonstration. Scholarpedia, 8(12). Retrieved from (2021 December, 30) http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Robot_learning_by_demonstration
• Biswas, I. & Johnson, M. (2015). A Pedagogical Framework to Teach HW-SW Co-Design. Retrieved from http://ilin.asee.org/Conference2015/papers/Johnson.pdf
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., and Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning: Putting it Into Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Blancas, M., Valero, C., Mura, A., Vouloutsi, V & Verschure, Paul F. M. J. (2020). “ CREA ” : An Inquiry-Based Methodology to Teach Robotics to Children. Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. M. Merdan et al. (Eds.): RiE 2019, AISC 1023, 45 – 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_4
• Boberg, A. L., & Morris-Khoo, S. A. (1992). The Delphi method: A review of methodology and an application in the evaluation of a higher education program. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 7(1), 27-39.
• Borel, M.C.G., Lopes, R.O.P., Thofehrn, M.B., Nóbrega, M.M.L., Arreguy-Sena, C., & Brandão, M.A.G. (2021). Guideline for incorporating the Delphi method in the evaluation of nursing theories. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 29:e3387. DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.4157.3387
• Boudersa, (2016). The Importance of Teachers' Training Programs and Professional Development in the Algerian Educational Context: Toward Informed and Effective Teaching Practices. Expériences Pédagogiques, 1. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309430087_The_Importance_of_Teachers'_Training_Programs_and_Professional_Development_in_the_Algerian_Educational_Context_Toward_Informed_and_Effective_Teaching_Practices
• Boyd-Batstone, P. (2004). Focused Anecdotal Records Assessment: A Tool for Standards-Based, Authentic Assessment. The Reading Teacher, 58(3), 230-239. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20205471.pdf
• Bozkurt, F. (2020). Teacher Candidates’ Views on Self and Peer Assessment as A Tool for Student Development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1). Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol45/iss1/4
• Brennan, K. & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, 1–25. Retrieved from http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/ct/files/AERA2012.pdf
• Brinda, T., Puhlmann, H., Schulte, C. (2009). Bridging ICT and CS: Educational standards for computer science in lower secondary education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(3), 288–292.
• Broadbent E, Kumar V, Li X, Sollers J 3rd, Stafford RQ, MacDonald BA, et al. (2013). Robots with Display Screens: A Robot with a More Humanlike Face Display is Perceived to Have More Mind and a Better Personality. PLoS ONE, 8(8): e72589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072589
• Broadfoot, P. (1998). Preface. In Inman, S. Buck M. & Burke, H. (eds). Assessing personal and social development. London: Falmer Press.
• Brown, F. G. (1983). Principles of educational and psychological testing (3rd ed.). NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Brown, G. T. L., and Harris, L. R. (2013). Student Self-Assessment. In the SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. edited by J. McMillan. 367–393. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Buitrago Flórez, F., Casallas, R., Hernández, M., Reyes, A., Restrepo, S., Danies, G. (2017). Changing a generation’s way of thinking: Teaching computational thinking through programming. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 834–860.
• Cadence PCB Solutions Blog. (2019). What is Hardware Software Co-design and How Can it Benefit You or Your Business? Retrieved from (2021 July, 7) https://resources.pcb.cadence.com/blog/2019-what-is-hardware-software-co-design-and-how-can-it-benefit-you-or-your-business
• Calinon, Sylvain. (2018). Learning from Demonstration (Programming by Demonstration). Encyclopedia of Robotics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41610-1_27-1
• Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2021). Approaches to teaching and learning. Implementing the curriculum with Cambridge: A guide for school leaders, 40-47 Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/271333-approaches-to-teaching-and-learning.pdf
• Cao, Y., & Brizuela, B. M. (2016). High school students’ representations and understandings of electric fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020102.
• Carr, R. L., Bennett IV, L. D., & Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K‐12 STEM standards of the 50 US states: An analysis of presence and extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 539-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00061.x.
• Carro, G., Castro, M., Sancristobal, E., Diaz, G., Mur, F., Latorre, M., . . . Giller, D. (2014). The Color of The Light: A Remote Laboratory that uses A Smart Device that Connects Teachers and Students. Istanbul: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).
• Catala, A. Theune, M. Gijlers, H. & Heylen, D. (2017). Storytelling as a Creative Activity in the Classroom. C&C '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3078857
• Catlin, D. & ylvester, Robertson. (2012). Using educational robots to enhance the performance of minority student. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum - Trento, Italy,s 12–21.
• Centre for NeuroTechnology (CFNT) (2019). Building Artificial Neural Networks with Arduinos: A Curriculum Unit for High School Biology and AP Biology Classes. University of Washington. Retrieved from https://centerforneurotech.uw.edu/sites/default/files/ANN%20Bio%20Unit_Full.pdf
• Çetinkaya, A. & Baykan, O. K. (2020). Prediction of middle school students' programming talent using artificial neural networks. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 23(6), 1301–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.07.005
• Ceylan, M., Arslan, M.H., Ceylan, R., Kaltakci, M.Y., Özbay, Y. (2010). A New Application Area of ANN and ANFIS: Determination of Earthquake Load Reduction Factor of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 27(1), 53-69.
• Cha Jae Gwan. (2017). A Study on the Development of Coding Education Program based on Arduino.Smart Media Journal, 6(4), 72-78.
• Chambers, J., Carbonaro, M., & Rex, M. (2007). Scaffolding Knowledge Construction through Robotic Technology: A Middle School Case Study. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 6, 55-70. Retrieved from http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume6/Chambers.pdf
• Chandra, S., Alves-Oliveira, P., Lemaignan, S., Sequeira, P., Paiva, A. and Dillenbourg, P. (2016). Children's peer assessment and self-disclosure in the presence of an educational robot. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 539-544. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745170.
• Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A. & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Comput. Sci.,136, 16–24.
• Chaudhary, V., Agarwal, V., Sureka, P. & Sureka, A. (2016). An Experience Report on Teaching Programming and Computational Thinking to Elementary Level Children using Lego Robotics Education Kit. 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E). DOI: 10.1109/T4E.2016.016
• Chen, L., Chen, P. & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access. DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
• Chen, L., Chen, P. & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. Doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.
• Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
• Ching, Chin-Phoi. (2014). Linking Theory to Practice: A Case-Based Approach in Teacher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1425
• Chiu T. K. F. (2021) A holistic approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI) curriculum for K-12 schools, TechTrends. 65, 796–807 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00637-1
• Chiu T. K. F., Meng, H., Chai C. S., King I., Wong S. & Yeung Y. (2021). Creation and evaluation of a pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3085878
• Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable Curriculum Planning for Artificial Intelligence Education: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568
• Chong, G., Jian, M. & Zhiying, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies 4, 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001
• Chou, P. N. (2018). Skill development and knowledge acquisition cultivated by maker education: Evidence from Arduino-based educational robotics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14, 1–9.
• Chu, H. C., Wang, C. C. & Wang, L. (2019). Impacts of Concept Map-Based Collaborative Mobile Gaming on English Grammar Learning Performance and Behaviors. Educational Technology & Society. 22(2), 86-100.
• Chung, Chan-Jin. & Shamir, Lior. (2020). Introducing Machine Learning with Scratch and Robots as a Pilot Program for K-12 Computer Science Education. 3rd International Conference on Future Learning (ICFL 2020), December 17-19, 2020, London, United Kingdom.
• Ciaraldi, M., Cobb, E., Looft, F., Norton, R, & Padir, Taskin. (2009). Designing an undergraduate robotics engineering Curriculum: Unified Robotics I and II. American Society for Engineering Education, Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. doi: 10.18260/1-2--5201
• Ciptono, A., Setiyono, S., Nurhidayati, F., & Vikaliana, R. (2019, October). Fuzzy Delphi method in education: A mapping. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1360(1), 012029.
• Classroom Diagnostic Tools Core Team. (2012). Recommendations for One‐to ‐One Conferencing with Your Students 2013-2014. Retrieved from https://www.freedomareaschools.org/cms/lib/pa02217880/Centricity/Domain/51/One-to-One%20Conferencing%20Booklet.pdf
• Clibbens, N., Walters, S., & Baird, W. (2012). Delphi research: issues raised by a pilot study. Nurse Researcher, 19(2), 37-44.
• Cockburn, A., & Bryant, A. (1997). Lego: an equal opportunity user interface for programming. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 8(5-6), 601 – 619.
• Code.org (2015a). The hour of code is here. Retrieved from: https://code.org/
• Confucius Quotes. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/79127-if-your-plan-is-for-one-year-plant-rice-if
• Conto, C. A., Akseer, S., Dreesen, T., Kamei, A., Mizunoya, S. & Rigole, A. (2020). COVID-19: Effects of School Closures on Foundational Skills and Promising Practices for Monitoring and Mitigating Learning Loss. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/COVID-19_Effects_of_School_Closures_on_Foundational_Skills_and_Promising_Practices_for_Monitoring_and_Mitigating_Learning_Loss.pdf
• Coronado, E., Mastrogiovanni, F., Indurkhya, B. & Venture, G. (2020). Visual Programming Environments for End-User Development of intelligent and social robots, a systematic review. Journal of Computer Languages, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cola.2020.100970
• Costelloe, E. (2004). Teaching programming: The state of the art. Department of Computing, Institute of Technology Tallaght, Dublin 24. CRITE Technical Report.
• Cotton, K. (1988). Monitoring Student Learning in the Classroom: School Improvement Research Series Close-Up #4. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED298085.pdf
• Craft, A. (2000) Creativity across the Primary Curriculum: Framing and Developing Practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
• Craft, A. (2001) ‘Little c: creativity in craft’, in A. Craft, B. Jeffrey and M. Liebling (eds) Creativity in Education, London: Continuum.
• Creativity and STEM/STEAM. The Education University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://www.eduhk.hk/creativity/view.php?secid=52699
• Cremin, T & Barnes, J. (2015). Learning to Teach in the Primary School. Creativity in the Curriculum. Routledge.
• Critcher, C., & Gladstone, B. (1998). Utilizing the Delphi technique in policy discussion: a case study of a privatized utility in Britain. Public Administration, 76(3), 431-449.
• CSTA. (2011). CSTA K–12 computer science standards. The ACM K-12 Education Task Force. http://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/CSTA_K-12_CSS.pdf
• CT curriculum, Government of USA. Retrieved from https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SDE/Health-Education/curguide_generic.pdf
• Dagiene, V., Hromkovic, J. & Lacher, R. (2021). Designing informatics curriculum for K-12 education: From Concepts to Implementations. Informatics in Education, 20(3). DOI: 10.15388/infedu.2021.22
• Dalkey N & Helmer O. (1962). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.
• Dalkey, N. C., Rourke, D. L., Lewis, R., & Snyder, D. (1972). Studies in the quality of life. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
• Dalkey, N.C. & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag. Sci. 9, 458–467.
• Daniela, G., Rodrigo, C. P., Ludovic, A. & François, P. (2019). A Tool for High-Level Modeling of Analog/Mixed Signal Embedded Systems. MODELSWARD 2019- 7th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, Prague, Czech Republic, 435-442, ⟨10.5220/0007520804350442⟩. ⟨hal-01963837⟩
• De Raffaele, C., Smith, S. & Gemikonakli, O. (2018). An Active Tangible User Interface Framework for Teaching and Learning Artificial Intelligence. 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI, Japan, 535–546 Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3172944.3172976
• Debeunne, C. & Vivet, D. (2020). A Review of Visual-LiDAR Fusion based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping. Sensors 2020, 20(7), 2068. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20072068
• Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal groups and Delphi process. Glenview, Illinois: Scott
• Delphi technique to validate Multiple Intelligence based Instructional Teaching Module for preschool children. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 10(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol10.1.6.2021
• Dempster, F. N., & Perkins, P. G. (1993). Revitalizing classroom assessment: using tests to promote learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 20(3), 197-203.
• Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-com puting-programmes-of-study
• DeShun Harris. (2019). Office Hours Are Not Obsolete: Fostering Learning through One-on-One Student Meetings. In edition: Behind the Classroom: An Examination of Law Schools in the 21st Century. Duq. L. Rev, 57 (1). Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol57/iss1/5
• Desouza, G. N. & Kak, A.C. (2002). "Vision for mobile robot navigation: A survey". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(2), 237–267. doi:10.1109/34.982903
• Dine, A., Elouardi, A., Vincke, B. and Bouaziz, S. (2016). Graph-Based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Computational Complexity Reduction on a Multicore Heterogeneous Architecture. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(4), 160-173.
• Dodge, D. (2021). Block Coding | Everything You Need to Know in 2021. CodaKid. Retrieved from (2021 July, 5) https://codakid.com/block-coding/ doi: 10.1109/MRA.2016.2580466
• Doke,E.R. & Swanson, N.E. (1995). Decision variables for selecting prototyping in information systems development: a Delphi study of MIS managers. Inf. Manag, 29, 173–182.
• Dokmetas, G. (2016). Arduino training book. Dikey Eksen Yayıncılık.
• Dorgu, T. E. (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for Effective Curriculum Implementation in the Classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3 (6), 77-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.s.2015030601.13
• Dragule, S. Gonzalo, S. G., Berger, T. & Pelliccione, P. (2020). Languages for Specifying Missions of Robotic Applications. Retrieved from (2021 July, 5) http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~bergert/paper/2021-bookchapter-roboticslanguages.pdf
• Druga, S. (2018). Growing up with AI. Cognimates: from coding to teaching machines. Retrieved from https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/growing-up-with-ai/
• E, De Vet., Brug. J., Nooijer. J. De, Dijkstra, A. & N.K. De Vries. (2005). Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study. Health Educ. Res, 20, 195–205.
• Eastland Junior-Senior High School, Lanark. (2016). Robotics/BioMechanics Syllabus. Retrieved from https://p5cdn4static.sharpschool.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_3095788/File/Robotics%20BioMechanics%20Syllabus.pdf
• Ebrahimi, M., Daneshtalab, M., Sreejesh, N. P., Liljeberg, P. and Tenhunen, H. (2009). Efficient network interface architecture for network-on-chips. 2009 NORCHIP, 1-4, doi: 10.1109/NORCHP.2009.5397837.
• Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R. & Lin, Xialing. (2018). I, teacher: using artificial intelligence (AI) and social robots in communication and instruction. Communication Education, 67 (4), 473-480. DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2018.1502459
• Eguchi, A, (2014). Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills. Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems, 8(1). DOI: 10.14313/JAMRIS_1-2014/1
• Ekici, B.B. & Aksoy, U.T. (2010). Prediction of Building Energy Consumption by Using Artificial Neural Networks. Advances in Engineering Software, 40(5), 356-362.
• Electronic Notes Blog. (2021). LabVIEW is developed and produced by National Instruments as an environment used for graphical system design. Retrieved from (2021 July, 8) https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/test-methods/labview/what-is-labview.php
• Eleni, T. & Ifigenia, K. (2020). Observation as an Alternative Assessment method in assessing Second-Language productive skills. Πρακτικά Εργασιών 6ου Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου, για την Προώθηση της Εκπαιδευτικής Καινοτομίας, Λάρισα, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349149814_Observation_as_an_Alternative_Assessment_method_in_assessing_Second-_Language_productive_skills
• Emden, M. & Sumfleth, E. (2014). Assessing students’ experimentation processes in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 29-54. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10763-014-9564-7.pdf
• Epstein, J. L., and F. L.VanVoorhis. 2001. More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist,36(3), 181–93.
• Erin, B, Abiyev, R. & Ibrahim, D. (2010). Teaching robot navigation in the presence of obstacles using a computer simulation program. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 565-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.064
• Esongo, N. M. (2017). Correlation between the Availability of Resources and Efficiency of the School System within the Framework of the Implementation of Competency-Based Teaching Approaches in Cameroon. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(2), 82-92. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1131789.pdf
• Estevez, J., Garate, G. & Graña, M. (2019). Gentle Introduction to Artificial Intelligence for High-School Students Using Scratch. IEEE Access, 7, 179027-179036. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956136.
• Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. (In Wikipedia) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_artificial_intelligence
• Eubank, B.H., Mohtadi, N.G., Lafave, M.R. et al. (2016). Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. BMC Med Res Methodol, 16(56). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8
• European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Tuomi, I. (2019). The impact of Artificial Intelligence on learning, teaching, and education. European Union Publications Office.
• Fan, C. K. & Cheng, C. L. (2006). A study to identify the training needs of life insurance sales representatives in Taiwan using the Delphi approach. International Journal of Training and Development, 10(3), 212–226. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2006.00255.x https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2006.00255.x)
• Farida, N., & Rasyid, H.A. (2019). The Effectiveness of Project-based Learning Approach to Social Development of Early Childhood. Proceedings of the International Conference on Special and Inclusive Education (ICSIE 2018). DOI:10.2991/ICSIE-18.2019.67
• Fleming, D. L. (2008). Using Best Practices In Online Discussion And Assessment To Enhance Collaborative Learning. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal (CTMS), 4(10), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.19030/ctms.v4i10.5573
• Focus Taiwan. (Janury 31, 2022). Almost 70% of rural schoolgoers lack device for online learning: poll. Retrieved from (June 11, 2022) https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202201310005
Foresman Company.
• Forsell, J. Frykedal, K. F. & Chiriac, E. H. (2019). Group Work Assessment: Assessing Social Skills at Group Level. Small Group Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419878269
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., Mcdonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active Learning Increases Students’ Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 8410-8415. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23/8410.full.pdf
• Fridin, M. (2014). Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot: A tool for constructive learning in preschool education. Computers & Education, 70, 53–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.043
• Frotzscher, A. et al. (2014). Requirements and Current Solutions of Wireless Communication in Industrial Automation", Proc. IEEE ICC Wksps., pp. 67-72. Retrieved from (5 July 2021) https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6881174
• Gadomska, A. (2015). Using LEGO Blocks for Technology-Mediated Task-Based English Language Learning. Teaching English with Technology, 15(2), 120-132. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1140583.pdf
• García-Peñalvo, F. J., Reimann, D., Maday, C. (2018). Introducing coding and computational thinking in the schools: The TACCLE 3–coding project experience. In Computational thinking in the STEM disciplines, 213–226). Springer.
• GestureTek, (2016). Interactive Information Displays. GestureTek. Retrieved from (2021 July, 8) https://gesturetekhealth.com/solutions/interactive-information-displays
• Ghalia, M. Ben. (2013). Integration of sensors and electrical engineering into secondary geometry curriculum. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1771-1775. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2013.6685142.
• Gibson, M. (2019). Crafting communities of practice: the relationship between making and learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/c10798-017-9430-3.
• Glatthorn, A. A., F. Boschee, B. M. Whitehead, and B. F. Boschee. (2018). Curriculum Leadership: Strategies for Development and Implementation. London: SAGE publications.
• Google. (2010). Exploring computational thinking. https://www.google.com/edu/computational-thinking/
• Grandgenett, N., Ostler, E., Topp, N., & Goeman, R. (2014). Robotics and Problem-Based Learning in STEM Formal Educational Environments. In I. Management Association (Ed.), K-12 Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 463-488. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4502-8.ch028
• Gray, K. (2020). Assessing Literacy Skills with One-on-One Conferencing. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/assessing-literacy-skills-one-one-conferencing
• Green, R. & Birch, S. (2018). Ensuring quality in EPs’ use of dynamic assessment: a Delphi study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 35(1), 82–98. doi:10.1080/02667363.2018.1538938
• Green, R., & Birch, S. (2019) Ensuring quality in EPs’ use of dynamic assessment: a Delphi study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 35(1), 82-98.
• Greenberg, R. I. & Thiruvathukal, George K. (2019). Exercises Integrating High School Mathematics with Robot Motion Planning. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). doi:10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028394
• Greenberg, R. I. (2019). Mathematics and Programming Exercises for Educational Robot Navigation. 2019 Global Conference on Educational Robotics (GCER), Norman, Oklahoma. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10114873
• Greenspan, W. L., Meisels, S. J. (1996). The Zero to Three Work Group on Developmental Assessment. Towards a new vision for the developmental assessment of infants and young children. In Meisel, S. J. & Fenichel, E. (Eds), New Visions for the Developmental Assessment of Infants and Young Children, 11-26. Washington, DC: Zero to Three: National Center for Infants, Toddlers, and Families.
• Grime, Megan M. and Wright, George. (2016). Delphi Method: Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat07879
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. D. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.
• Guo W, Li R, Cao C, Gao Y. (2016). Kinematics, dynamics, and control system of a new 5-degree-of-freedom hybrid robot manipulator. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. doi:10.1177/1687814016680309
• Gura, M. (2012). Lego robotics: STEM sport of the mind. Learning and Leading with Technology, 40(1), 12- 16. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ991224
• Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC.
• Guven, G., Cakir, N. K., Sulun, Y., Cetin, G. & Guven, E. (2020). Arduino-assisted robotics coding applications integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1812136
• Gyebi, (2017). The Effectiveness of Integrating Educational Robotic Activities into Higher Education Computer Science Curricula: A Case Study in a Developing Country. Educational Robotics in the Makers Era: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series, 560, 73–87. Retrieved form https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_6
• Hahn, E.J. & Rayens, M.K. (1999). Consensus for tobacco policy among former state legislators using the policy Delphi method. Tob. Control, 8, 137–140.
• Han, R., & Yin, Y. (2021). Application of web embedded system and machine learning in English corpus vocabulary recognition. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 80, 103634. doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103634
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32 (4), 1008-1015.
• Havoutis, I., Calinon, S. (2019). Learning from demonstration for semi-autonomous teleoperation. Auton Robot 43, 713–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9745-2
• Haykin, S. (1994). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. New York: Macmillan.
• Helmer O (1967). Analysis of the Future: The Delphi Method The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.
• Helmer O (1983). Looking Forward: A Guide to Futures Research Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
• Herro, D. & Quigley, C. (2016). Innovating with STEAM in middle school classrooms: remixing education. On the Horizon, 24(3). pp. 190 – 204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OTH-03-2016-0008
• heuristics: an exploratory Delphi study. Education Tech Research Dev, 59, 841–863. DOI 10.1007/s11423-011-9209-2
• Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 56–64. doi:10.3102/0013189X12437203
• Höfner, S., Schütze, A., Hirth, M., Kuhn, J., & Brück, B. (2021). Modeling of the Function Principle of Semiconductor Gas Sensors for High School Students. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 17(3). Retrieved from https://eds.a.ebscohost.com/abstract?site=eds&scope=site&jrnl
• Hohmann, E., Cote, M.P. & Brand, J. C. (2018). Research pearls: expert consensus-based evidence using the Delphi method. Arthroscopy, 34, 3278-3282. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.004
• Holmes, W.; Bialik, M.; Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education; Center for Curriculum Redesign: Boston, MA, USA.
• Horton, C. & Bowman, B. T. (2002). Child Assessment at the primary level: Expert opinions and state trends. Chicago: Erikson Institute.
• How Effective Are Intelligent Tutoring Systems? (2015). // APA Journals Artic. Spotlight. (as cited in Chassignol et al. 2018)
• Howe, S. F. (1984). It's 1984 and robots are in the classroom. Media and Methods, 20(5), 9-14.
• Hsieh, Y.Z., lin, S.S., Luo, Y.C., Jeng, Y.L., Tan, S. W., Chen, C. R. & Chiang, P.Y. (2020). ARCS-Assisted Teaching Robots Based on Anticipatory Computing and Emotional Big Data for Improving Sustainable Learning Efficiency and Motivation. Sustainability, 12. doi:10.3390/su12145605
• Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.
• Hsu, T. C., Abelson, H., Lao, N., Chen, S. C. (2021). Is It Possible for Young Students to Learn the AI-STEAM Application with Experiential Learning? Sustainability, 13, 11114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911114
• Huaizhong, Li., Andreas, Ö., & Wayne, H. (2017). Application of Experiential Learning to Improve Student Engagement and Experience in a Mechanical Engineering Course. European Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1402864
• Huang, B. (2015). Open-source Hardware – Microcontrollers and Physics Education - Integrating DIY Sensors and Data. Washington: ASEE PEER.
• Huang, C. Y. & Bachrach, M. (2018). A JavaScript Curriculum for High School Students to Explore Computer Science. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(12). doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.12.1152
• Hussain, S., Lindh, J., & Shukur, G. (2006). The effect of LEGO training on pupils’ school performance in mathematics, problem solving ability and attitude: Swedish data. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 182-194.
• Hwang, G.J., Xie, H., Wah, B.W., Gasevic, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence,1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
• Hyunjin, C. (2021). A Study on the SW Coding Education Method Using Arduino in the Age of Internet of Things. 6th International Conference on Design Engineering and Science (ICDES 2021). Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1875 (012016). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1875/1/012016
• Ibraheem, J.L. D. & Al-Umargi, M. (2019). Training Program for the Educational Supervisors of the Primary School in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to Develop Supervising Abilities and Their Tendency Towards Their Career in the Light of the Vision of 2030. Basic Education College Magazine for Educational and Humanities Sciences, 31, 196-218. Retrieved from https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/126235
• Ikart, E. M. (2019). Survey Questionnaire Survey Pretesting Method: An Evaluation of Survey Questionnaire via Expert Reviews Technique. Asian Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v4i2.565
• International Bureau of Education, UNESCO, (2021). Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fr
• Jago, N. M. (2019). Mental health beyond the school gate: young people's perspectives of mental health support online, and in home, school and community contexts. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 161pp.
• Jara, C. A., Candelas, F. A., Puente, S. T. & Torres, F. (2011). Hands-on experiences of undergraduate students in Automatics and Robotics using a virtual and remote laboratory. Computers & Education, 57(4). doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.003
• Jiang, Y. (2014). Exploring teacher questioning as a formative assessment strategy. RELC J. 45, 287–304. doi: 10.1177/0033688214546962
• Jiang, Yan. (2020). Teacher Classroom Questioning Practice and Assessment Literacy: Case Studies of Four English Language Teachers in Chinese Universities. Front. Educ. Assessment, Testing and Applied Measurement. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00023
• Joe, J. N., McClellan, C. A., & Holtzman, S. L. (2014). Scoring design decisions: Reliability and the length and focus of classroom observations. In T. J. Kane, K. A. Kerr, & R. C. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project, 415-443. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Johnson, C. M. (2016). Rethinking online discourse: Improving learning through discussions in the online classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1483–1507
• Jonah, V. (2021). Use cases for visual programming environments today. LogRocket Blog. Retrieved from (2021 July, 5) https://blog.logrocket.com/use-cases-visual-programming-environments-today/
• Jones, A., Castellano, G. (2018). Adaptive Robotic Tutors that Support Self-Regulated Learning: A Longer-Term Investigation with Primary School Children. Int J of Soc Robotics 10, 357–370 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0458-z
• Jones, Ann. (2010). Affective issues in learning technologies: emotional responses to technology and technology's role in supporting socioemotional skills. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ910545.pdf
• Jones, R. R. (1968). Differences in response consistency and subjects' preferences for three personality inventory response formats. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 247-248.
• K–12 Computer Science Framework. (2016). Retrieved (2021 August, 27) from https://k12cs.org.
• Kabátová, M. & Pekárová, J. (2010). Learning how to teach robotics. Constructionism, Paris.
• Kalelioğlu, F. (2015). A new way of teaching programming skills to K-12 students: Code.org. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 200–210.
• Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Menzinger, M., Halatschek, R., Kemény, F. & Landerl, K. (2019). MINT-Robo: Empowering Gifted High School Students with Robotics. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028478.
• Kaskens, J., Goei, S. L., Van Luit, J. E. H., Verhoeven L. & Segers E. (2021). Dynamic Maths interviews to identify educational needs of students showing low math achievement. European Journal of Special Needs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1889848
• Kathrine, F. H. E. & Kristian, J. S. (2020). A modified Delphi method to elicit and compare perceptions of industry trends. MethodsX. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101081.
• Kazimoglu, C., Kiernan, M., Bacon, L. & MacKinnon, L. (2011). Understanding computational thinking before programming. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. 1(3), 30 – 52
• Keegan, R.J., Barnett, Lisa M. et al. (2019) Defining Physical Literacy for Application in Australia: A Modified Delphi Method. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(2), 105-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0264
• Kelleher, C. & Pausch, R. (2003). Lowering the barriers to programming: a survey of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR), 37(2), 83 – 137.
• Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
• Kelly, A., Finch, L., Bolles, M. & Shapiro, R. B. (2018). BlockyTalky: New programmable tools to enable students’ learning networks. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 18, 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.03.004
• Khanlari, A. (2014). Teachers’ Perceptions Of Using Robotics In Primary/Elementary Schools In Newfoundland and Labrador. Master Thesis. St.John’s Newfoundland and Labrador: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
• Kiddle Encyclopedia. (2021). Neural network facts for kids. Retrieved from (2021 July, 5) https://kids.kiddle.co/Neural_network
• Kiddle Encyclopedia. (2021). Sensor facts for kids. Retrieved from (2021 July, 7) https://kids.kiddle.co/Sensor
• Kim, B. D. (2019). Development of STEAM Program based on Aduino Coding and Application to Elementary School After School. Master’s dissertation. Daegu National University of Education.
• Kim, H. J. et al. (2016). The Effect of Scratch Programming Education Using Arduino onMiddle School Students' Creative Problem-Solving Ability. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(12), 707-724.
• Kim, S., Jang, Y., Kim, W., Choi, S., Jung, H., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2021). Why and What to Teach: AI Curriculum for Elementary School. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. The Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-21), 35(17) : IAAI-21, EAAI-21, AAAI-21 Special Programs and Special Track. Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/17833
• Kim, W. W., & Choi, J. S. (2016). Design and Implementation of Actuator Module with Bluetooth Communication for Education using Arduino. The Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, 22 (1), 325-343.
• Kim, Y.J., Park, S.W., Yeom, H.G. (2015). A study on a robot arm driven by three-dimensional trajectories predicted from non-invasive neural signals. BioMed Eng OnLine, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-015-0075-8
• Kivrak, H., Uluer, P., Kose, H., Gumuslu, E., Barkana, D. E., Cakmak, F. & Yavuz, S. (2020). Physiological Data-Based Evaluation of a Social Robot Navigation System. 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 994-999. doi: 10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223539
• Kolb, A. Y. (2021). What Is Experiential Learning? Retrieved from (2020 December, 27) https://experientiallearninginstitute.org/resources/what-is-experiential-learning/
• Kopcha, T.J., McGregor, J., Shin, S. et al. (2017). Developing an Integrative STEM Curriculum for Robotics Education Through Educational Design Research. J Form Des Learn, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0005-1
• Korb, K. A. Selzing-Musa, G. & Skinner-Bonat, S. B. (2015). The Effect of Training On Teachers’ Knowledge of Effective Classroom Management Strategies In Jos Metropolis. Global Journal of Educational Research, 15, 79-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v15i1.9
• Kornerup, J. (2014). Graphical System Design. LabVIEW R&D National Instruments. Retrieved from http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~gerstl/ee382v_s14/notes/UT_ECE_GuestLecture_02182014_Final.pdf
• Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M. & Doolaard, S. (2014). Effective classroom management strategies and classroom management programs for educational practice. GION onderwijs/onderzoek. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hanke-Korpershoek/publication/322266852_Effective_classroom_management_strategies_and_classroom_management_programs_for_educational_practice/links/5a4f4d930f7e9bbfacfcf90c/Effective-classroom-management-strategies-and-classroom-management-programs-for-educational-practice.pdf
• Koyimah, K., Widodo, W., Suprapto, N. & Prahani, B. (2020). Effectiveness of Interactive Microcontroller Based Speed Sensors to Improve Students' Analytic Thinking Skills. International Association of Online Engineering. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217991/.
• Krathwohl, D. R. (1998). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. Long Grove, IL:Waveland Press.
• Kucuk, S. & Sisman, B. (2017). Behavioral patterns of elementary students and teachers in one-to-one robotics instruction. Computers & Education, 111, 31-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.002
• Kurelovic, E. K., Tomljanovic, J. & Kralj, M. (2020). Students' Attitudes About Learning on Arduino Projects. 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED)At: Valencia, Spain. doi: 10.21125/inted.2020.0078
• LabVIEW Graphical System Design-From Kindergarten to Rocket Science, http://www.ni.com/newsletter/50596/en/
• Landrum, T.J., and McDuffie, K.A. (2010). Learning Styles in the Age of Differentiated Instruction. Exceptionality: A Special Educatiosn Journal, 18(1), 6-17.
• Laws of Robotics. (In Wikipedia). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_robotics
• Leang, KK, Pannozzo, G, Zou, Q, & Devasia, S. (2007). A Collaborative Approach to Teach Modeling and Control of Smart Actuators in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum. Engineering Education and Professional Development in International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7, 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2007-41839
• Lee. J. H. (2018). Design to TUI type blocks coding moduleusing Arduino for Computational Thinkingeducation. Master’s dissertation. Sunchon National University.
• Leftheriotis, I., Giannakos, M.N. & Jaccheri, L. (2017). Gamifying informal learning activities using interactive displays: an empirical investigation of students’ learning and engagement. Smart Learn. Environ, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-017-0041-y
• Leitinger, E., Meyer, F., Tufvesson, F. and Witrisal, K. (2017). Factor graph based simultaneous localization and mapping using multipath channel information. IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, 652-658. doi: 10.1109/ICCW.2017.7962732.
• Lerner, J., Roberts, G. J., Green, K., & Coleman, J. (2021). Prioritizing competencies for beginning teachers in high-poverty schools: A Delphi study. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 32(2), 17-46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1296530.pdf
• Li, R. & Wong, T. (2018). Teaching Them before We Teach: The Effectiveness of Conducting Classroom Experiments before Teaching the Underlying Theory. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(3). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1198659.pdf
• Liang, C. C., & Schwen, T. (1997). A framework for instructional development in corporate education. Educational Technology, 37(4), 42–45.
• Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). Introduction. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, 3–12. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Liu, M., Gibby, S., Quiros, O., & Demps, E. (2002). Challenges of being an instructional designer for new media development. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 195–219.
• Liu, M.-C., & Chi, M.-H. (2012). Investigating Learner Affective Performance in Web-based Learning by using Entrepreneurship as a Metaphor. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (3), 202–213.
• Liu, S., Bell, C. A., & Jones, N. D. (2017). The validity of classroom observation systems in research and applied contexts. Paper presented at the annual spring meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE), Washington, DC.
• Liu, Y., Li, Z., Liu, H. &Kan, Z. (2020). Skill transfer learning for autonomous robots and human–robot cooperation: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2020.103515
• Liying Xia & Baichang Zhong, (2018). A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12. Computers & Education, 127, 267–282.
• Lu, C. C., Hong, J.C., Chen, F.F. & Ma, S.Y. (2020). Elementary School Students Learn Arduino Programming to Assemble Sensory-Controlled Works. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(4). doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.4.1374
• Lu, Yang. (2019): Artificial intelligence: a survey on evolution, models, applications and future trends. Journal of Management Analytics. DOI:10.1080/23270012.2019.1570365
• Luan, Hui, et al. (2020). Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820
• Lundberg, S.M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J.M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb J., Bansal N., & Lee, S. I. (2020). Explainable AI for trees: From local explanations to global understanding. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9.
• Magnuson, L. A. (2012). A Delphi study to understand relational bonds in supervision and their effect on rehabilitation counselor disclosure in the public rehabilitation program. PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.ecyybx7n
• Magnuson, L. A. (2012). A Delphi study to understand relational bonds in supervision and their effect on rehabilitation counselor disclosure in the public rehabilitation program (Order No. 3552012). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (1289132276). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/1289132276?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
• Maker, C. J. & Zimmerman. R. H. (2020). Concept Maps as Assessments of Expertise: Understanding of the Complexity and Interrelationships of Concepts in Science. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(3), 254-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20921770
• Makokotlela, M. V. (2020). An E-Portfolio as an Assessment Strategy in an Open Distance Learning Context. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 16(4). DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.2020100109
• Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B. and Eastmond, E. (2010). The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 10(4), 1–15.
• Manseur, R. (2014). Robotics Engineering Program and Curriculum Development. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044426.
• Marcus, G. (2012). Morals Machine. The New Yorker Blog. Retrieved from https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Online/100-FYS-F15/Readings/Marcus,%20Moral%20Machines.pdf
• Mariescu-Istodor, R. & Jormanainen. I. (2019). Machine Learning for High School Students. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 1–9.
• Massolino, P. M. C., Longa, P., Renes, J. & Batina, L. (2020). A Compact and Scalable Hardware/Software Co-design of SIKE. Cryptology ePrint Archive. ACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, (2), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.13154/tches.v2020.i2.245-271
• Matutino, P. M., Dias, T. & Sampaio, P. (2020). Teaching Hardware/Software Co-Design Using a Project-Based Learning Strategy. 2020 XIV Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching Conference (TAEE), 1-6. doi: 10.1109/TAEE46915.2020.9163759.
• Mayerova, K. (2012). Pilot Activities: LEGO WeDo at Primary School. Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics, 32-39. Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.345&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Mayerová, K. (2012). Pilot Activities: LEGO WeDo at Primary School. Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics. 32-39.
• McArthur, D., Lewis, M. & Bishary, M. (2005). The Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Current Progress and Future Prospects. J. Educ. Technol, 1, 42–80.
• McClure, Nancy C. (2012). Demonstrated the importance and significance of the subject matter. The IDEA Center. Retrieved from https://ideacontent.blob.core.windows.net/content/sites/2/2020/02/DemonstratedImportanceSubjectMatter.pdf
• McCulloch, W.S., Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
• McGuire, Jerry. (1996). For Efficient Signal Processing in Embedded Systems, Take a DSP, not a RISC. Analog Dialogue, 30(3), 14-15
• McIntyre-Hite, L. M. (2016). A Delphi Study of Effective Practices for Developing Competency-Based Learning Models in Higher Education. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3426&context=dissertations
• McKerrow, P. J. & Antoun, S. M. (2008). A software architecture for mobile robot navigation. https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/695
• Medrano, S. A. C. (2020). Portfolio-Based Assessment Practices of Selected High School English Language Teachers in Metro Manila. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8). DOI: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I8/PR280617
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Meinert. J. (1985, May). Robots are ready! Are you? Industrial Education, 74, 22-23
• Michell, G.D., & Gupta, R.K. (1997). Hardware/software co-design. Proc. IEEE, 85, 349-365.
• Mick, S., Lapeyre, M., Rouanet, P., Halgand, C., Benois-Pineau, J., Paclet, F., Cattaert, D., Oudeyer, P. Y. and de Rugy, A. (2019). Reachy, a 3D-Printed Human-Like Robotic Arm as a Testbed for Human-Robot Control Strategies. Front. Neurorobot, 13(65). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2019.00065
• Mikropoulos, T. A. & Bellou, I. (2013). Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 5-14.
• Ministry of Education. (2019). The Plan to Foster the AI Teachers; Ministry of Education: Sejong, Korea.
• Mitsui, H., Kambe, H. & Koizumi, H. (2009). Use of Student Experiments for Teaching Embedded Software Development Including HW/SW Co-Design. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(3), 436-443. doi: 10.1109/TE.2008.930096.
• Monroy-Hernández, A., & Resnick, M. (2008). Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. Interactions, 15(2), 50-53.
• Moore, T.J., Glancy, A.W., Tank, K.M., Kersten, J.A., Smith, K.A., & Stohlmann, M.S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-college Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069
• Moorehead, M., Listman, J. B., Kapila, V. (2015). A Robotics-Focused Instructional Framework for Design-Based Research in Middle School Classrooms. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Session: W233B, June. https://peer.asee.org
• Morgan, H. (2014). Maximizing Student Success with Differentiated Learning. The Clearing House. A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 87(1), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2013.832130
• Musić, J. et al. (2020). Robotics and information technologies in education: four countries from Alpe‑Adria‑Danube Region survey. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09631-9
• Muthugala, M. A. V. J. & Jayasekara, A. G. B. P. (2018). A Review of Service Robots Coping with Uncertain Information in Natural Language Instructions. IEEE Access, 6, 12913-12928. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2808369.
• Mutodi, P. & Chigonga, B. (2016). Concept map as an assessment tool in secondary school mathematics: An analysis of teachers’ perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(10), 2685-2696. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.2301a
• Nakhaeinia, D., Payeur, P., Hong, T. S. & Karasfi, B. (2015). A hybrid control architecture for autonomous mobile robot navigation in unknown dynamic environment. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 1274-1281, doi: 10.1109/CoASE.2015.7294274.
• Nasir, I. M., Yusoff, A., Khairudin, M., Idris, M. R., & Ma’arof, N. N. I. (2019). Delphi Method: The Development of Robotic Learning Survey in Tertiary Education. Journal of Vocational Education Studies, 2(1), 13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v2i1.761
• National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2000). Report on National Curriculum Framework for School Education. New Delhi, India. Retrieved from https://epathshala.nic.in/National_Curriculum_Frameworks/NCF-2000/NCF_2000_Eng.pdf
• Nelissen, M. A., Dijker, A. J. M. & de Vries, N. K. (2007). Emotions and goals: Assessing relations between values and emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 21(4), 902-911. DOI: 10.1080/02699930600861330
• Niels Pinkwart, N. (2016). Another 25 Years of AIED? Challenges and Opportunities for Intelligent Educational Technologies of the Future. Int J Artif Intell Educ, 26, 771-783. DOI 10.1007/s40593-016-0099-7
• Niiranen, S. (2016). Increasing girls’ interest in technology education as a way to advance women in technology. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research, 71. Jyväskylän yliopisto.
• Niu, Shuo., McCrickard, D. S. and Nguyen, S. M. (2016). Learning with interactive tabletop displays. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-9. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757601.
• Nkhoma, M., Lam, T., Richardson, J., Kam, K., & Lau, K. H. (2016). Developing case-based learning activities based on the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (In SITE), 85-93. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3496
• Nourbakhsh, I.R., Crowley, K., Bhave, A. et al. (2005). The Robotic Autonomy Mobile Robotics Course: Robot Design, Curriculum Design and Educational Assessment. Autonomous Robots, 18,103–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AURO.0000047303.20624.02
• Novák, M., Kalová J. & Pech, J. (2018). Use of the Arduino Platform in Teaching Programming. 2018 IV International Conference on Information Technologies in Engineering Education (Inforino), 1-4, doi: 10.1109/INFORINO.2018.8581788
• Nworie, J. (2011). Using the Delphi Technique in Educational Technology Research. TechTrends, 55(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0524-6
• NYAEC, (2009). Planning curriculum to achieve important goals. NYAEC: A Position Statement. Retrieved from http://earlylearningsuccess.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/NAEYC-Position-Statement-on-Curriculum-Planning.pdf
• NYU Steinhardt, (2008). Culturally Responsive Differentiated Instructional Strategies. Retrieved from https://research.steinhardt.nyu.edu/scmsAdmin/uploads/005/120/Culturally%20Responsive%20Differientiated%20Instruction.pdf
• Oborne, D. W., Hoh, Y. C., Hutchinson, L. R. (2014). A Teacher-Based Checklist for the Assessment of Student Learning and Development. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 9(4). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1045892
• OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills Education 2030: Position Paper. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
• Ogilvie, E. (1974). Creativity and Curriculum Structure. Educational Research, 16(2), 126-132, DOI: 10.1080/0013188740160207
• Okal, G., Yildirim, B. & Timur, S. (2020). The Effect of Coding Education on 5th, 6th and 7th Grade Students' programming Self-Efficacy and Attitudes About Technology. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(2), 143-165. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2020.251.8
• Olubunmi Ajayi, H. (2019). Analysis of The Pre-Primary School Children Assessment Procedure in Nigeria. Asia-Pacific Journal OF Research In Early Childhood Education, 13(1), 69-83. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.17206/Apjrece.2019.13.1.69
• Oluk, A., & Saltan, F. (2015). Effects of using the scratch program in 6th grade information technologies courses on algorithm development and problem-solving skills [Special issue]. Participatory Educational Research, 10-20.
• Oosterhof, A., R. Conrad, and Ely, D. (2008). Assessing Learners Online. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Opoku, M. P., Nketsia, W., Fianyi, I., & Laryea, P. (2020). Inclusive education for students with sensory disabilities in Ghana: views of students with disabilities about availability of resources in regular schools. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1807623
• Oppong-Nuako, J., Shore, B. M., Saunders-Stewart, K. S., & Gyles, P. D. T. (2015). Using Brief Teacher Interviews to Assess the Extent of Inquiry in Classrooms. Journal of Advanced Academics, 26(3), 197–226. doi:10.1177/1932202x15588368
• Ozakyol, H., Karaman, C. & Bingul, Z. (2019). Advanced robotics analysis toolbox for kinematic and dynamic design and analysis of high-DOF redundant serial manipulators. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(6), 1429-1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22160
• Ozcan, O., & Hacer, O. (2013). An examination of computer engineering students’ perceptions about asynchronous discussion forums. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(14), 371–37.
• Özmen, B., & Altun, A. (2014). Undergraduate students' experiences in programming: difficulties and obstacles. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5(3), 1-27.
• Panadero, E. & Brown, G.T.L. (2017). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: positive experience predicts use. Eur J Psychol Educ, 32, 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5
• Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L. and Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The Future of Student Self-Assessment: A Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2.
• Papert, S., & Solomon, C.(1971). Twenty things to do with a computer. In Studying the Novice Programmer (pp. 3-28). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
• Paramita, P., Sharma, U., & Anderson, A. (2019). Indonesian teachers’ causal attributions of problem behaviour and classroom behaviour management strategies. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–19. doi:10.1080/0305764x.2019.1670137
• Park, S.J., Han, J.H., Kang, B.H., & Shin, K.C. (2011). Teaching Assistant Robot, ROBOSEM, in English Class and Practical Issues for its Diffusion. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), Half-Moon Bay, CA, USA, 2–4 October 2011.
• Parsonson, B.S. (2012). Evidence-Based Classroom Behaviour Management Strategies. Kairaranga, 13(1), 16-23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ976654.pdf
• Pasquale, F. (2020). Introduction: In New Laws of Robotics. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press, (pp. 1-32). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674250062-001
• Pati˜no-Escarcina, R. E., Barrios-Aranibar, D., Bernedo-Flores, L.S., Alsina, P.J. & Goncalves, L. M. G. (2021). A Methodological Approach to the Learning of Robotics with EDUROSC-Kids. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 102(34). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01400-7
• Patricia, Sims. (1987). Basic Robotics Curriculum: An Introductionary Unit for Junior High School Students. UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations, 52. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=etd
• Patrick, W., Tchounikine, P., Chao, M. Q. (2018). A framework for the development of orchestration technologies for technology-enhanced learning activities using tablets in classrooms. // Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn,10 (1/2).
• Pavlin-Bernardić, N, Ravić, S. & Pavao-Matić, I. (2016). The Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Children’s Giftedness. Suvremena psihologija, 19(1), 49-59. DOI: 10.21465/2016-SP-191-04
• Payne, B. H. (2019). An Ethics of Artificial Intelligence Curriculum for Middle School Students. MIT Media Lab. Retrieved from https://thecenter.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/MIT-AI-Ethics-Education-Curriculum.pdf
• Pedró, F., Subosa, M. & Rivas, A. (2019). Valverde, P. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. UNESCO: Paris, France,
• Pedró, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.
• Peer Assessment. (In Wikipedia). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_assessment
• Penmetcha, M. R. (2012). Exploring the effectiveness of robotics as a vehicle for computational thinking. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University: Purdue.
• Petre, M. & Price, B. (2004). Using Robotics to Motivate ‘ Back Door ’ Learning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
• Piedade, J., Nuno, D., Ana, P., & João, F. M. (2020). On Teaching Programming Fundamentals and Computational Thinking with Educational Robotics: A Didactic Experience with Pre-Service Teachers. Education Sciences 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090214
• Pike, I., Piedt, S., Davison, C.M. et al. (2015). Youth injury prevention in Canada: use of the Delphi method to develop recommendations. BMC Public Health 15(1274). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2600-x
• Piltch, A. (2017). Anki Adds Programming Capability to Cozmo Robot. Accessed (2021 Dec, 12) from https://www.tomsguide.com/us/anki-code-lab-features,news-25376.html
• Plauska, I. & Damaševičius, R. (2013). Design of Visual Language Syntax for Robot Programming Domain. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 403, 297-309. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41947-8_25
• Ponce P., Molina A., Hernández L., Acha E., Morales B., Huitron C. (2017). Teaching Math in Elementary Schools by LabVIEW and Lego Robots. In: Chang I., Baca J., Moreno H., Carrera I., Cardona M. (eds). Advances in Automation and Robotics Research in Latin America, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54377-2_22
• Popescu, T. (2014). Classroom Management Strategies and Techniques: A Perspective of English Teacher Trainees. Journal of Linguistic Intercultural Education, 7. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Teodora-Popescu-2/publication/303119548_Classroom_management_strategies_and_techniques_A_perspective_of_English_teacher_trainees/links/5737aded08aea45ee83db5d5/Classroom-management-strategies-and-techniques-A-perspective-of-English-teacher-trainees.pdf
• Poulou, M. S., Reddy, L. A. & Dudek, C. M. (2021). Assessment of teacher instructional and behavior management practices in Greek elementary schools: An initial investigation. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1871454
• Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
• Pratiwi, U., Sriyono, S. & Akhdinirwanto, R. W. (2018). Student Computational Logical Thinking of Block Programming Concept in Arduino Learning by S4A (Scratch for Arduino). Proceedings of the 5th Asia Pasific Education Conference (AECON 2018). DOI: 10.2991/aecon-18.2018.47
• Priestley, M. & Biesta, G. (2013). Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice (Eds.). In A&C Black; Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK.
• Prima, E. C., Putri, A. R., & Rustaman, N. (2018). Learning Solar System Using PhET Simulation to Improve Students' Understanding and Motivation. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 60-70.
• Purzer, S., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R.S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(9).
• Quiñonero- Palacios, F., Rubió-Massegú, J., Rossell, J.M. & Karimi, H.R. (2019). Design of inerter-based multi-actuator systems for vibration control of adjacent structures. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 356(14), 7785-7809. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.03.010
• Raber, C. (2015). Design-Based Learning: What is it and why does it matter? Retrieved from (2021 April) http://www.teachwithdesign.com/dbl
• Raj, J. T. & Sankar, J. (2017). IoT based smart school bus monitoring and notification system. IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC), 89-92. doi: 10.1109/R10-HTC.2017.8288913
• Raskin, M.S. (1994). The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: expert consensus on issues and research priorities. J. Soc. Work. Educ, 30, 75–89.
• Rauber, P. E., Fadel, S. G., Falcão, A. X. & Telea, A. C. (2017). Visualizing the Hidden Activity of Artificial Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(1), 101-110. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598838.
• Ravichandar, H., Polydoros, A. S., Chernova, S. Billard, A. (2019). Recent Advances in Robot Learning from Demonstration. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 3, 13.1–13.34. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-100819-063206
• Reiser, R. A. (2007). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsy (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.), 2–9. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Repenning, A., Webb, D., Ioannidou, A. (2010, March). Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on computer science education, 265–269.
• Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B. et al. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM. 52(11), 60–67.
• Resnick, M.; Bruckman, A.; and Martin, F. (1996). Pianos not stereos: Creating computational construction kits. Interactions, 3(5), 40-50.
• Ridwan, I. I., Salim, K. R., Adam, Z., Mohd, I. I., & El Fadil, N. (2020). Development and Validation of Scale using Rasch Analysis to Measure Students’ Entrepreneurship Readiness to Learn Embedded System Design Course. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 545–550. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.067
• Rincón-Saavedra, Y., Garzón-Morales, E. & Cortés-Rico, L. (2019). Learning through designing, designing through doing. CLIHC '19: Proceedings of the IX Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3358961.3358983
• Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into Practice, 47, 220-228. DOI: 10.1080/00405840802153916
• Robotics/Bio Mechanics Syllabus, (2017-18). Eastland Jr. /Sr. High School Curriculum Guide, Lanark, UK. Retrieved from https://p5cdn4static.sharpschool.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_3095788/File/Robotics%20BioMechanics%20Syllabus.pdf
• Rodrigo, C. P., Daniela, G., & Ludovic, A. (2019). Modeling and Virtual Prototyping for Embedded Systems on Mixed-Signal Multicores. International Conference Proceeding Series, RAPIDO ’19, Valencia, Spain. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3300189.3300193
• Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5, 17–28.
• Roll, I. & Wylie, R. (2019). Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education. IntJ ArtifIntell Educ, 26, 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
• Romero, E., Lopez, a. & Hernandez, O. (2012). A pilot study of robotics in elementary education. 10th Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology, Panama. http://pepycambodia.org/
• Rong, H., Choi, I. (2019). Integrating failure in case-based learning: a conceptual framework for failure classification and its instructional implications. Education Tech Research Dev, 67, 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9629-3
• Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev., 65(6), 386.
• Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting: the role of the Delphi technique, in: J.S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston et al., 125–144.
• Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 79–91.
• Rowlands, K. D. (2007). Check It Out! Using Checklists to Support Student Learning. The English Journal, 96(6). 61-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/30046754 https://www.jstor.org/stable/30046754
• Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
• Sabo, K. E., Atkinson, R. K., Barrus, A. L., Joseph, S. S., & Perez, R. S. (2013). Searchingfor the two sigma advantage: Evaluating algebra intelligent tutors. Computers inHuman Behavior, 29(4), 1833-1840. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.001
• Sabuncuoglu, A. (2020). Designing One Year Curriculum to Teach Artificial Intelligence for Middle School. ITiCSE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341525.3387364
• Sáez-López, J. M., Román-González, M., Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129–141.
• Salas-Morera, L., Arauzo-Azofra, A. & García-Hernández, L. (2012). Analysis of online quizzes as a teaching and assessment tool. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.30
• Samani T., Porayska-Pomsta K., & Luckin R. (2017). Bridging the gap between high and low performing students through performance learning online analysis and curricula (Lecture). In E. André, R. Baker, X. Hu, M. Rodrigo, and B. du Boulay (Eds.), AIED (2017), 650 – 655.
• Sanders, N. M. (1966). Classroom Questions: What Kinds? New York, NY: Harper and Row.
• Santana M.A. et al. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational data mining techniques for early prediction of students’ academic failure in introductory programming courses. // Comput. Human Behav,73, 247–256. (as cited in Chassignol et al. 2018)
• Scaradozzi, D., Sorbia, L., Pedalea, A., Valzano, M. &Vergine, C. (2015). Teaching robotics at the primary school: an innovative approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(12), 3838-3846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1122
• Schaal, S. (1996). Learning from Demonstration. Retrieved from (2021 December, 30) https://papers.nips.cc/paper/1996/file/68d13cf26c4b4f4f932e3eff990093ba-Paper.pdf
• Schulz, P., Matthe, M., Klessig, H., Simsek, M., Fettweis, G., Ansari, J., et al. (2017). Latency Critical IoT Applications in 5G: Perspective on the Design of Radio Interface and Network Architecture. IEEE Communications Magazine (ComMag), 55(2), DOI:10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600435CM.
• Seda, I. & Pearson, P. David. (1991). Interviews to assess learners’ outcomes. Literacy Research and Instruction, 31(1), 22-32. DOI: 10.1080/19388079109558068
• Sensetime (2018, Novemeber 1). Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence. East China Normal University. Retrieved from https://www.sensetime.com/en/Service/ai_class.html
• Serholt, S. (2017). Child-robot interaction in education. PhD thesis. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
• Šešlija, M., Reljić, V., Šešlija, D., Dudić, S., Dakić, N., Jovanović, Z. (2021). Reuse of Exhausted Air from Multi-Actuator Pneumatic Control Systems. Actuators. 10(6), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/act10060125
• Shamir, G., Levin, I. (2021). Neural Network Construction Practices in Elementary School. Künstl Intell, 35, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00729-3
• Sharma, D.P., P.S.C. Nair, R. Balasubramanian. (2003). Analytical search of problems and prospects of power sector through Delphi study: case study of Kerala State, India, Energy Policy, 31, 1245–1255.
• Sharma, K., Leftheriotis, I. & Giannakos, M.N. (2020). Utilizing Interactive Surfaces to Enhance Learning, Collaboration and Engagement: Insights from Learners’ Gaze and Speech(Special Issue). Sensors, 20. doi:10.3390/s20071964
• Shepard, L. A., Kagan, S. L., & Wurtz, E. O. (1998). Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
• Shernoff, E. S., Frazier, S. L., Lisetti, C., Delmarre, A., Zainab Bibi & Gabbard, J. (2021). Supporting the Implementation of Evidence-Based Behavior Management Practices through Simulation: A Mixed Method Study. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2021.1875840
• Sherry, Ileana. (2021). One-on-One Conferences as a Tool for Building a Rapport With Students. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/one-one-conferences-tool-building-rapport-students
• Shields, T. J., Silcock, G.W.H., Donegan, H.A. & Bell, Y.A. (1987). Methodological problems associated with the use of the Delphi technique. Fire Technol. 23, 175–185.
• Shin, S., Park, P., & Bae, Y. (2013). The effects of an information-technology gifted program on friendship using scratch programming language and clutter. International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering, 2(3), 246-249.
• Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Yamato, J., Kogure, K. (2005). Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 267–279.
• Shroff, R. H., Deneen, C.C. & Ng, E. M. W. (2011). Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students’ Behavioral intention to use an e-portfolio system, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 600-618. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.940
• Siddiqui, A. A. & Müller, P. (2012). A Requirement-Based Socket API for a Transition to Future Internet Architectures. Sixth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, Palermo, Italy. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IMIS.2012.117
• Silm, G., Tiitsaar, K., Pedaste, M., Zacharia, Z. C. & Papaevripidou, M. (2017). Teachers’ Readiness to Use Inquiry-based Learning: An Investigation of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Attitudes toward Inquiry-based Learning. Science Education International, 28(4). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1161535.pdf
• Sitlington, H. B. and Coetzer, A. J. (2015). Using the Delphi technique to support curriculum development. Education + Training, 57(3), 306-321. DOI 10.1108/ET-02-2014-0010.
• Skelton, G. W., & Pang, Q., & Zheng, W., & Shih, H., & Pei, T. (2011). Using Robotics for Teaching Critical Thinking, Problems Solving, and Self-Regulated Learning for Freshmen Engineering Students. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--18885
• Skulmoski, G. A., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1-21.
• Smidt, S. (2005). Observing, assessing and planning for children in the early years. New York, NY, Routledge.
• Soika, K., Reiska, P. & Mikser, P. (2014). Concept Mapping as an Assessment Tool in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5). DOI: 10.33225/jbse/14.13.662
• Spinelli, T. (1983). The Delphi decision-making process. J. Psychol, 113, 73–80.
• Stančić, Milan. (2020). Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. DOI:10.1080/02602938.2020.1828267
• STEM Institute. (2013). https://www.stem-institute.org/
• Stenhouse, R., Tait, J., Hardy, P. & Sumner, T. (2013). Dangling conversations: Reflections on the process of creating digital stories during a workshop with people with early stage dementia. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20, 134-141. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01900.x
• Strandberg, M. (2013). Homework – is there a connection with classroom assessment? A review from Sweden. Educational Research, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.844936
• Strimel, G. J. (2019). Design cognition and student performance. In P. J. Williams & D. Barlex (Eds.). Explorations in technology education research. Helping teachers to develop research informed practice, 173–192. Singapore: Springer.
• Studica Robotics. NI LabVIEW Academic Site License - LabVIEW Research Only. Retrieved from (2021 Oct, 1) https://www.studica.com/it/fr/National-Instruments-for-Schools/-3/781851-35_2.html
• Štuikys, Vytautas, Burbaitė, Renata. (2018). A Vision for Introducing STEM into CS Education at School. Smart STEM-Driven Computer Science Education: Theory, Methodology and Robot-based Practices, 31-35
• Suchyadi, Y., Karmila, N., Nurlela, N., Santa ., Mirawati, M., Handayani, R., Purnamasari, R., Indriani, R. S., Wijaya, A. & Anwar, W. S. (2019). Increasing Personality Competence of Primary School Teachers, through Education Supervision Activities in Bogor City. Journal of Community Engagement, 1(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jce/article/view/1369
• Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R., Jr (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. Journal of graduate medical education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
• Sumardi, S., Adzima, R. & Wijaya, A. N. (2020). Digital Video Project: An Authentic Assessment to Assess Students’ Speaking Skills. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(1). eISSN-2503-4197. DOI: 10.21462/ijefl.v5i1.217.
• Sylvester, R. & Greenidge, W. (2009). Digital storytelling: Extending the potential for struggling writers. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.4.3
• Taherdoost, H. (2019). What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design: Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale/Attitude Scale/Likert Scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 8(1). ISSN: 2296-1747. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02557308/document
• Tanizaki Y., Jimenez, F. & Kanoh, M. (2017). Learning effect of robotic encouragement-based collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Naples, Italy, 9–12 July 2017.
• Tanja, K., et al. (2010). Generation NXT: building young engineers with LEGOs. IEEE Trans. Educ. 53(1), 80 – 87.
• Taylor, M., Harlow, A., & Forret, M. (2010). Using a computer programming environment and an interactive whiteboard to investigate some mathematical thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 561- 570.
• Teaching and Learning Computer Science with VEXcode VR. (2020). Retrieved from https://kb.vex.com/hc/en-us/articles/360048861071-Teaching-and-Learning-Computer-Science-with-VEXcode-VR
• Teich, J. (2012). Hardware/software codesign: The past the present and predicting the future. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, 1411-1430.
• Thakur, N. (2014). A Study on Awareness of Trained Teachers in relation to Information and Communication Technology. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 4(1), 06-11. e-ISSN: 2320–7388, p-ISSN: 2320–737X. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1043.7389&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• The National Academic of Science and Engineering Press, US. (2001). Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Chapter: 3 Assessment in the Classroom, 23-58. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/9847/chapter/5#35
• Tiba, C., Condy, J., Chigona, A. & Tunjera, N. (2015). Digital storytelling as a tool for teaching: Perceptions of pre-service teachers. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 10(3), 285-301. DOI:10.4102/TD.V11I1.33
• Timms, M. J. (2016). Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: Educational Cobots and Smart Classrooms. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., 26(2), 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y
• Toivonen, T., Jormanainen, I., Kahila, J., Tedre, M., Valtonen, T. & Vartiainen, H. (2020). Co-Designing Machine Learning Apps in K–12 With Primary School Children. 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 308-310, doi: 10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00099.
• Tomlinson, C.A. (1999). Mapping a Route Toward Differentiated Instruction. Educational Leadership. 57(1), 12-16.
• Topping, K. J. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy & E. Cascallar (Eds.). Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards, 1, 55–87. Springer Netherlands.
• Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.). The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment, 395–412. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Tosuncuoglu, Irfan. (2018). Importance of Assessment in ELT. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9). DOI: 10.11114/jets. v6i9.3443
• Touretzky, D. (2017). Computational thinking and mental models: From Kodu to Calypso. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Blocks & Beyond Workshop, Raleigh, NC,.
• Touretzky, D. S., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F. & Seehorn, D. (2019). K-12 Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence: What Students Should Know. Retrieved from https://uocsweb03.uocslive.com/ISTE/ISTE2019/PROGRAM_SESSION_MODEL/HANDOUTS/112142285/ISTE2019Presentation_final.pdf
• Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI? The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-19). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795
• Tulbure, C. (2011). Do different learning styles require differentiated teaching strategies? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 155-159. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.052
• Turupcu, A. (2014). Observation as an assessment tool in early childhood education: a phenomenological case study of teacher views and practices. Master Thesis. Middle East Technical University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12617471/index.pdf
• Uşengül, L. & Bahçeci, F. (2020). The Effect of Lego Wedo 2.0 Education on Academic Achievement and Attitudes and Computational Thinking Skills of Learners toward Science. World Journal of Education, 10(4). doi:10.5430/wje.v10n4p83.
• Van Brummelen, J. & Lin, P. (2020). Engaging Teachers to Co-Design Integrated AI Curriculum for K-12 Classrooms. Retrived from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Engaging-Teachers-to-Co-Design-Integrated-AI-for-Brummelen-Lin/ad6f969a3018bbce2904e7623b35a270896ffaed
• VanNoy, T. (2021). Block-Based vs. Text-Based Programming. Retrieved from https://www.teq.com/block-vs-text-based-programming/
• Varney, M.W., Janoudi, A., Aslam, D.M., & Graham, D. (2012). Building young engineers: TASEM for third graders in woodcreek magnet elementary school. IEEE Trans. Educ. 55, 78 – 82.
• Verner, Igor M. (2013). Learning Physical Fields Through Practice with Robot Sensors in a High School Electronics Course. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2004.10642861
• Veselovská, M., Mayerová, K., Kubincová, Z. & Chiu, F. Y. (2018). A Pilot Study: Comparing The Work Of Children With Lego WeDo 2.0 In Slovakia And Taiwan. Proceedings in 11th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Spain. doi: 10.21125/iceri.2018.2412
• VEX code. https://www.vexrobotics.com/vexcode
• VEX Programs. RobotiX Institute, New Jersey. Retrieved from https://www.rxiedu.com/vex-robotics
• VIA News. (June 3, 2020). Taiwan’s Pursuit of AI Education, from Past to Present. Retrieved from (June 11, 2022) https://www.viatech.com/en/2020/06/ai-education-from-past-to-present/
• Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., and Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Comput. Human Behav. 89, 98–110. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027
• Vogel, C., Zwolinsky, S., Griffiths, C. et al. (2019). A Delphi study to build consensus on the definition and use of big data in obesity research. Int J Obes, 43, 2573–2586 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0313-9
• Von Der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79, 1525-1536.
• Wang, A. I. & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818
• Wang, Y. M. (2019). Enhancing the Quality of Online Discussion— Assessment Matters. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(1), 112-129. DOI: 10.1177/0047239519861416
• Watt, M. (1984). The robots are coming. Popular Computing, 1(13), 71-72, 75-77.
• Wegmann, S. J., & McCauley, J. K. (2014). Investigating asynchronous online communication: A connected stance revealed. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(1), 97–113.
• Wei, Y., Wang, F., Pan, Z. et al. (2021). Development of a competency model for general practitioners after standardized residency training in China by a modified Delphi method. BMC Fam Pract, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01508-7
• Weil, S., McGuigan, N., & Kern, T. (2011). The usage of an online discussion forum for the facilitation of case-based learning in an intermediate accounting course: A New Zealand case. Open Learning, 26(3), 237–251.
• Weintrop, D. & Wilensky, U. (2017). Comparing Block-Based and Text-Based Programming in High School Computer Science Classrooms. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 18(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3089799
• Weng, C., Matere, I.M., Hsia, C.-H., Wang, M.-Y. and Weng, A. (2021). Effects of LEGO robotic on freshmen students' computational thinking and programming learning attitudes in Taiwan. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-01-2021-0027
• Whitehead, E. A. (2020). A Successful Tool in the English Language Teaching and Learning. The Excellence in Education Journal, 9(3). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1284618.pdf
• Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding By Design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Assn. for Supervision & Curriculum Development. Print.
• Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance. San Francisco: Josset- Bass.
• Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–36.
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.
• Wu, S.-Y., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). Visual Programming Environments and Computational Thinking Performance of Fifth- and Sixth-Grade Students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(6), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120988807
• Xhemajli, Arbona. (2016). The Role of the Teacher in Interactive Teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 4(1). doi:10.5937/IJCRSEE1601031X
• Xia, L. & Zhong, B. (2018). A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12. Computers & Education, 127, 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.007
• Yan, B., Wu, C., & Shi, P. (2019). Formation consensus for discrete-time heterogeneous multi-agent systems with link failures and actuator/sensor faults. Journal of the Franklin Institute. doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.03.028
• Yan, Zike. & Zha, Hongbin. (2019). Flow-based SLAM: From geometry computation to learning. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 1(5), 435-460. doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2019.09.001
• Yao, Y. (2015). Teacher Perceptions of Classroom Assessment: A focus group interview. SRATE Journal, 24 (2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083125.pdf
• Yasin, A. I., Prima, E.C. & Sholihin, H. (2018). Learning Electricity using Arduino-Android based Game to Improve STEM Literacy. Journal of Science Learning, 1(3), 77-94. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1226377.pdf
• Yew, E. & Goh, K. (2019). Problem-Based Learning: An Overview of its Process and Impact on Learning. Health Professions Education, 2 (2), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004
• Yiadom-Boakye, G. (2011). Students’ perception about virtual chat (synchronous) and discussion board (asynchronous) course content delivery (Unpublished thesis). University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, MO.
• York, C. S. & Ertmer, P.A. (2011). Towards an understanding of instructional design. Education Tech Research Dev, 59, 841–863. DOI 10.1007/s11423-011-9209-2
• Yousuf, M.I. (2007). Using Experts` Opinions Through Delphi Technique Using Experts` Opinions Through Delphi Technique. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/rrph-t210
• Yukselturk, E., & Altiok, S. (2017). An investigation of the effects of programming with Scratch on the preservice IT teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions and attitudes towards computer programming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12453
• Zainal, N. F. A., Din, R., Abd Majid, N. A., Nasrudin, M. F., & Abd Rahman, A. H. (2018). Primary and secondary school students perspective on Kolb-based STEM module and robotic prototype. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(4-2), 1394-1401. http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.4-2.6794
• Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H. & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729
• Zawieska, K. & Duffy B.R. (2015). The Social Construction of Creativity in Educational Robotics. In: Szewczyk R., Zieliński C., Kaliczyńska M. (eds) Progress in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 351. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15847-1_32
• Zhang, Ke. & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025
• Zhong, B. & Xia, L. (2018). A Systematic Review on Exploring the Potential of Educational Robotics in Mathematics Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 79 – 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09939-y
• Zhong, X.L., Li, H. X., Xu J. H. & Song, S. Q. (2017). Interactive teaching support systems in smart classrooms: Research and practice. 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE), 9-11, doi: 10.1109/ICCSE.2017.8085454.
|